ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2017, Issue 7, 2017, Pages

  Qamarul Hoda, Muhammad ^a   Samad, Khalid ^a   Ullah, Hameed ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASE REGISTRY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXYGENATION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESPIRATORY THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT FAILURE; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; META ANALYSIS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION;

ADULT; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 85024839454     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009026.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Ambi U, Koppal R, Joshi C, Prakashappa DS, Iyer H. LMA Classic and LMA proseal: a comparative study in paralyzed anaesthetized patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2011;5:940-3. 6327791
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agrò F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002;96(2):289-95. [PUBMED: 11818758]6327793
3. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000;85(2):262-6. [PUBMED: 10992836]6327795
4. Khazin V, Ezri T, Yishai R, Sessler DI, Serour F, Szmuk P, et al. Gastroesophageal regurgitation during anesthesia and controlled ventilation with six airway devices. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2008;20(7):508-13. [PUBMED: 19019665]6327797
5. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002;88(6):824-7. [PUBMED: 12173201]6327799
6. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT, Rosano A, Lanza G, Bernardini A. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients. British Journal of Anaesthesa 2003;90(3):323-6. [PUBMED: 12594145]6327801
7. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell'Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard laryngeal mask airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2003;15(6):428-32. 6327803
8. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010;27(7):598-601. [PUBMED: 19915475]6327805
9. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000;84(5):650-4. [PUBMED: 10844848]6327807
10. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, Renner J, Scholz J, Steinfath M, et al. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007;24(2):134-40. [PUBMED: 16895620]6327809
11. Goldmann K, Gerlach M, Bornträger C. ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in normal weight and obese patients: oxygenation under pressure-controlled ventilation and different end-expiratory pressures [ProSeal® - Kehlkopfmaske in normalgewichtigen und adipösen Patienten]. Anaesthesist 2011;60(10):908-15. [PUBMED: 21796447]6327811
12. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2009;53(7):852-7. [PUBMED: 19426239]6327813
13. López AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, Gambús P, Pons M, Anglada T. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011;107(2):265-71. [PUBMED: 21576096]6327815
14. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH. LMA-Classic (TM) and LMA-ProSeal (TM) are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2003;50(1):71-7. [PUBMED: 12514155]6327817
15. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010;27(7):602-7. [PUBMED: 20540172]6327819
16. Shariffuddin II, Wang CY. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2008;63(1):82-5. [PUBMED: 18086075]6327821
17. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2010;57(7):672-8. [PUBMED: 20411444]6327823
18. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA - Supreme - a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008;101:405-10. [PUBMED: 18559351]6327825
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93(1):104-9. [PUBMED: 10861152]6327827
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Pühringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2001;93(5):1351-3. [PUBMED: 11682428 ]6327829
21. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002;88(4):527-33. [PUBMED: 12066729]6327831
22. Li CW, Xue FS, Mao P, Xu YC, Liu Y, Zhang GH, et al. An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2007;19(2):81-5. [00706531]6327833
23. Natalini G, Rosano A, Lanza G, Martinelli E, Pletti C, Bernardini A. Resistive load of laryngeal mask airway and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in mechanically ventilated patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2003;6(47):761-4. [PUBMED: 12803596]6327835
24. Comparison in difficult airway scenario induced in patients with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) - Classic™, LMA™ - Flexible and LMA - Proseal™. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02979171?term=classic+laryngeal+mask+airway&rank=10 (first received 5 April 2016). 6327837
25. Benumof JL. Laryngeal mask airway. Indications and contraindications. Anesthesiology 1992;77(5):843-6. [MEDLINE: 1443734]
26. Benumof JL. Laryngeal mask airway and the ASA difficult airway algorithm. Anesthesiology 1996;84(3):686-99. [MEDLINE: 8659797]
27. Bernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65 712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia 2009;64(12):1289-94. [MEDLINE: 19860753]
28. Blanc VF, Tremblay NA. The complications of tracheal intubation: a new classification with a review of the literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1974;53(2):202-13. [MEDLINE: 4593090]
29. Bogetz MS. The laryngeal mask airway - role in managing the difficult airway. International Anesthesiology Clinics 1994;32(4):109-17. [MEDLINE: 7875906]
30. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask - a new concept in airway management. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1983;55(8):801-5. [MEDLINE: 6349667]
31. Brain AI, McGhee TD, McAteer EJ, Thomas A, Abu-Saad MA, Bushman JA. The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia 1985;40(4):356-61. [MEDLINE: 4003736]
32. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1995;42(11):1017-23. [MEDLINE: 8590490]
33. Brimacombe JR, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1995;7(4):297-305. [MEDLINE: 7546756]
34. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996;51(1):76-80. [MEDLINE: 8669573]
35. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America 2002;20(4):871-91. [PUBMED: 12512267]
36. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2005;52(7):739-60. [PUBMED: 16103390]
37. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88. [MEDLINE: 3802833]
38. Devitt JH, Wenstone R, Noel AG, O'Donnell MP. The laryngeal mask airway and positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesiology 1994;80(3):550-5. [MEDLINE: 8141451]
39. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF. ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002;88(4):584-7. [MEDLINE: 12066738]
40. GRADE Working Group, McMaster University. GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): GRADE Working Group, McMaster University, 2014 (accessed before 20 February 2017).
41. Griffin RM, Hatcher IS. Aspiration pneumonia and the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 1990;45(12):1039-40. [MEDLINE: 2132310]
42. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. British Medical Journal 2008;336(7651):995-8. [MEDLINE: 18456631]
43. Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. handbook.cochrane.org.
44. Higgins JP, Deeks J. Obtaining standard deviations from standard errors and confidence intervals for group means. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2011, issue 5.
45. Jones JR. Laryngeal mask airway: an alternative for the difficult airway. AANA Journal 1995;63(5):444-9. [MEDLINE: 7502644]
46. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. British Medical Journal 2001;323(7303):42-6. [MEDLINE: 11440947]
47. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Bittersohl J, Lirk P, von Goedecke A. Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway: three cases and a review of the literature. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004;93(4):579-82. [MEDLINE: 15247112]
48. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2005;15(3):229-34. [MEDLINE: 15725321]
49. Luckhaupt H, Brusis T. History of intubation. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie 1986;65(9):506-10. [MEDLINE: 3537595]
50. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Fick GH. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2000;47(7):622-6. [MEDLINE: 10930200]
51. Mark DA. Protection from aspiration with the LMA-ProSeal after vomiting: a case report. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003;50(1):78-80. [MEDLINE: 12514156]
52. McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 1999;54(5):444-53. [MEDLINE: 10995141]
53. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
54. Szmuk P, Ezri T, Evron S, Roth Y, Katz J. A brief history of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation, from the bronze age to the space age. Intensive Care Medicine 2008;34(2):222-8. [MEDLINE: 17999050]
55. Todesco J, Dodd C, Williams RT. Laryngeal mask airway: defining the limits. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 1993;40(9):900-1. [MEDLINE: 8403188]
56. Van Damme E. The laryngeal mask in ambulatory anesthesia. An evaluation of 5, 000 ambulatory anesthesia incidents [Die Kehlkopfmaske in der ambulanten Anästhesie. Eine Auswertung von 5000 ambulanten Narkosen]. Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie 1994;29(5):284-6. [MEDLINE: 7948496]
57. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11, 910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and non conventional usage. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996;82(1):129-33. [MEDLINE: 8712387]
58. Villars P, Koczka E, Haynie C. The use of the laryngeal mask airway with mechanical positive pressure ventilation. AANA Journal 2005;73(1):18. [MEDLINE: 15727277]
59. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC medical research methodology 2014;14(1):135. [PUBMED: 25524443]
60. Wat LI. The laryngeal mask airway for oral and maxillofacial surgery. International Anesthesiology Clinics 2003;41(3):29-56. [MEDLINE: 12872024]
61. Zhang X, Chen M, Li Q. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more effective than the LMA-Classic in pediatric anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2012;24(8):639-46. [PUBMED: 23122975]
62. Qamarul Hoda M, Samad K, Ullah H. Proseal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009026]