Resistive load of laryngeal mask airway and proseal laryngeal mask airway in mechanically ventilated patients

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 761-764

  Natalini, Giuseppe ^a,b   Rosano, A ^a   Lanza, G ^a   Martinelli, E ^a   Pletti, C ^a   Bernardini, A ^a  

^a Casa di Cura 'Poliambulanza' ^*  (Italy)

^b Terapia Intensiva Polifunzionale   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Artificial; Bronchoscopy; Laryngeal masks; Respiration, respiratory mechanics

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM BESILATE; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING MECHANICS; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEVICE; EXPIRATORY FLOW; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AIR PRESSURE; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS;

EID: 0037531255     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00133.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesthesia 2000: 84: 650-4.
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anaesthetised patients. Anesthesiology 2000: 93: 104-9.
3. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesthesia 2000: 85: 262-6.
4. Nunn JF. Applied Respiratory Physiology, 3rd edn. London: Butterworths & Co. Publishers, 1987.
5. Righini ER, Marangoni E, Volta CA, Alvisi R, Bortolazzi S, Gritti G. Additional inspiratory resistance imposed by the laryngeal mask airway: in vitro versus in vivo comparison. Anaesthesia 1997: 52: 872-8.
6. Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Fullekrug B, Dietz R, Schulte am Esch J. Resistance of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube in mechanically ventilated patients. Br J Anaesthesia 2000: 85: 410-6.
7. Rossi A, Gottfried SB, Higgs BD, Zocchi L, Grassino A, Milic-Emili J. Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure. J Appl Physiol 1985: 58: 1849-58.
8. Kacmarek RM, Hess DR. Airway pressure, flow and volume waveforms, and lung mechanics during mechanical ventilation. In: Kacmarek, RM, Hess, D, Stoller, JK, eds. Monitoring in Respiratory Care. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1993: 497-543.
9. Joshi S, Sciacca RR, Solanki DR, Young WL, Mathru MM. A prospective evaluation of clinical tests for placement of laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesiology 1998: 89: 1141-6.
10. Joshi GP, Morrison SG, White PF, Miciotto CJ, Hsia CC. Work of breathing in anesthetized patients: laryngeal mask airway versus tracheal tube. J Clin Anesthesia 1998: 10: 268-71.
11. Bhatt SB, Kendall AP, Lin ES, Oh TE. Resistance and additional inspiratory work imposed by the laryngeal mask airway. A comparison with tracheal tubes. Anaesthesia 1992: 47: 343-7.
12. Boisson-Bertrand D, Hannhart B, Rousselot JM, Duvivier C, Quilici N, Peslin R. Comparative effects of laryngeal mask and tracheal tube on total respiratory resistance in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 1994: 49: 846-9.
13. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puhringer F. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways. Anasthesiolo Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2000: 35: 692-4.