Erratum: Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal cancer on multiparametric MR (Scientific Reports (2017) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05728-9);Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Trebeschi, Stefano ^a,b   Van Griethuysen, Joost J M ^a,b   Lambregts, Doenja M J ^a   Lahaye, Max J ^a   Parmer, Chintan ^c   Bakers, Frans C H ^d   Peters, Nicky H G M ^e   Beets Tan, Regina G H ^a,b   Aerts, Hugo J W L ^a,c  

^a NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Zuyderland Medical Centre   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; RECTUM TUMOR;

AGED; AUTOMATION; DEEP LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACHINE LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 85023757909     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20029-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Young, H. K. et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance volumetric evaluation in predicting response to preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable rectal cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 62, 761-768 (2005).
2. Seierstad, T. et al. MRI volumetry for prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 88, 20150097 (2015).
3. Martens, M. H. et al. Prospective, multicenter validation study of magnetic resonance volumetry for response assessment after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: Can the results in the literature be reproduced? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 93, 1005-1014 (2015).
4. Lambregts, D. M. J. et al. MRI and Diffusion-weighted MRI Volumetry for Identification of Complete Tumor Responders After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Bi-institutional Validation Study. Ann. Surg. 262, 1034-9 (2015).
5. Carbone, S. F. et al. Assessment of response to chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer using MR volumetry based on diffusion-weighted data sets: a preliminary report. Radiol. Med. 117, 1112-24 (2012).
6. Ha, H. II., Kim, A. Y., Yu, C. S., Park, S. H. & Ha, H. K. Locally advanced rectal cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR tumour volumetry and the apparent diffusion coefficient for evaluating complete remission after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Eur. Radiol. 23, 3345-3353 (2013).
7. Curvo-Semedo, L. et al. Rectal Cancer: Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Combined Radiation Therapy with Chemotherapy-Conventional MR Volumetry versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging. Radiology 260, 734-743 (2011).
8. George, M. L. et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 88, 1628-1636 (2001).
9. Choi, M. H. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging: Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for detecting pathologic complete response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 44, 212-20 (2016).
10. Maas, M. et al. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 4633-4640 (2011).
11. Lambregts, D. M. J. et al. Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2220-5.
12. Nougaret, S. et al. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-derived Histogram Metrics for Assessment of Response after Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience and Comparison between Single-Section and Volumetric Analyses. Radiology 280, 446-454 (2016).
13. Van Heeswijk, M. M. et al. Automated and semiautomated segmentation of rectal tumor volumes on diffusion-weighted MRI: Can it replace manual volumetry? Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 94, 824-831 (2016).
14. Aerts, H. J. W. L. et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat. Commun. 5 (2014).
15. Aerts, H. J. W. L. et al. The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1636 (2016).
16. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436-444 (2015).
17. Greenspan, H., Ginneken, B. van & Summers, R. M. Guest Editorial Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35, 1153-1159 (2016).
18. Min, S., Lee, B. & Yoon, S. Deep learning in bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. bbw068, doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw068 (2016).
19. Carneiro, G. et al. Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings. in 280 (2016).
20. Irving, B. et al. Pieces-of-parts for supervoxel segmentation with global context: Application to DCE-MRI tumour delineation. Med. Image Anal., doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.03.002 (2016).
21. Day, E. et al. A region growing method for tumor volume segmentation on PET images for rectal and anal cancer patients. Med. Phys. 36, 4349-4358 (2009).
22. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Non-WMO Research. Available at: http://www.ccmo.nl/en/non-wmo-research. (Accessed: 21st March 2017).
23. Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M. A. & Pluim, J. P. W. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 196-205 (2010).
24. Shamonin, D. Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer's disease. Front. Neuroinform. 7, 1-15 (2013).
25. Klein, S., Pluim, J. P. W., Staring, M. & Viergever, M. A. Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 81, 227-239 (2009).
26. Mattes, D., Haynor, D. R., Vesselle, H., Lewellen, T. K. & Eubank, W. PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 120-128 (2003).
27. Insight Journal (ISSN 2327-770X)-Itk:Transforms supporting spatial derivatives. Available at: http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/756 (Accessed: 14th February 2017).
28. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1-9, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.007 (2012).
29. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: prevent NN from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929-1958 (2014).
30. Wu, H. & Gu, X. Max-pooling dropout for regularization of convolutional neural networks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 9489, 46-54 (2015).
31. Maas, A. L., Hannun, A. Y. & Ng, A. Y. Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models. in Proceedings of the 30 th International Conference on Machine Learning 6 (2013).
32. Zeiler, M. D. ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method. arXiv 6 (2012).
33. Al-rfou, R. et al. Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. 1-19.
34. Badrinarayanan, V., Handa, A. & Cipolla, R. SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Robust Semantic Pixel-Wise Labelling. arXiv Prepr. 5 (2015).
35. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention 9351, 234-241 (2015).
36. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T. & Ronneberger, O. 3D U-net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 9901 LNCS, 424-432 (2016).
37. Menze, B. H., Reyes, M., Farahani, K. & Kelpathy-Cramer, J. Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2014. (2014).
38. Havaei, M., Davy, A. & Warde-Farley, D. Brain Tumor Segmentation with Deep Neural Networks. arXiv Prepr. arXiv.. 13, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 (2015).
39. Rao, V., Sarabi, M. S. & Jaiswal, A. Brain Tumor Segmentation with Deep Learning. in Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation (BRATS) Challenge, MICCAI 56 (2015).