Pieces-of-parts for supervoxel segmentation with global context: Application to DCE-MRI tumour delineation

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue , 2016, Pages 69-83

  Irving, Benjamin ^a   Franklin, James M ^b   Papiez, Bartłomiej W ^a   Anderson, Ewan M ^b   Sharma, Ricky A ^c   Gleeson, Fergus V ^b   Brady, Sir Michael ^c   Schnabel, Julia A ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b CHURCHILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification; DCE MRI; Parts based graphical models; Rectal tumour; Segmentation; Supervoxel

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

DCE-MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; GRAPHICAL MODEL; MODELLING AND PREDICTIONS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; SIMILARITY COEFFICIENTS; SUPERVOXEL;

TUMORS;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECTUM CARCINOMA; TASK PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; PROCEDURES; RECTUM TUMOR;

ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84963691856     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Achanta R., Shaji A., Smith K., Lucchi A. SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012, 34:2274-2281.
2. Brown G., Daniels I.R., Richardson C., Revell P., Peppercorn D., Bourne M. Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005, 78(927):245-251.
3. Chen W., Giger M.L., Bick U. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad. Radiol. 2006, 13:63-72.
4. Felzenszwalb P.F., Girshick R.B., McAllester D., Ramanan D. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010, 32:1627-1645.
5. Felzenszwalb P.F., Huttenlocher D.P. Pictorial structures for object recognition. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2005, 61:55-79.
6. Fischler M.A., Elschlager R.A. The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1973, 22(1):67-92.
7. Franklin J., Irving B., Betts M., Pureza A., Brady M., Schnabel J., Gleeson F., Anderson E. Impact of interobserver variability on dcemri-derived pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer. Proceedings of the Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting (RSNA). Chicago IL. 2014.
8. Fulkerson B., Vedaldi A., Soatto S. Class segmentation and object localization with superpixel neighborhoods. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2009, 670-677.
9. Goh V., Halligan S., Gharpuray A., Wellsted D., Sundin J., Bartram C.I. Quantitative Assessment of colorectal cancer tumor vascular parameters by using perfusion ct: influence of tumor region of interest. Radiology 2008, 247(3):726-732.
10. Goh V., Padhani A.R., Rasheed S. Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis. Lancet Oncol. 2007, 8:245-255.
11. Gollub M., Gultekin D., Akin O., Do R., Fuqua J.L.I., Gonen M., Kuk D., Weiser M., Saltz L., Schrag D., Goodman K., Paty P., Guillem J., Nash G., Temple L., Shia J., Schwartz L. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI for the detection of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur. Radiol. 2012, 22:821-831.
12. Haber E., Modersitzki J. Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. Method. Inform. Med. 2007, 46:292-299.
13. Hamy V., Dikaios N., Punwani S., Melbourne A., Latifoltojar A., Makanyanga J., Chouhan M., Helbren E., Menys A., Taylor S., Atkinson D. Respiratory motion correction in dynamic MRI using robust data decomposition registration - application to DCE-MRI. Med. Image Anal. 2014, 18:301-313.
14. Heinrich M.P., Jenkinson M., Bhushan M., Matin T., Gleeson F.V., Brady M., Schnabel J.A. MIND: modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration. Med. Image Anal. 2012, 16.
15. Hodneland E., Hanson E.A., Lundervold A., Modersitzki J., Eikefjord E., Munthe-kaas A.Z. Segmentation-driven image registration- application to 4D DCE-MRI recordings of the moving kidneys. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2014, 23:2392-2404.
16. Irving B., Cifor A., Papiez B., Franklin J., Anderson E.M., Brady M., Schnabel J.A. Automated colorectal tumour segmentation in DCE-MRI using supervoxel neighbourhood contrast characteristics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014, Vol. 8673:609-616. Springer International Publishing. P. Golland, N. Hata, C. Barillot, J. Hornegger, R. Howe (Eds.).
17. Irving B., Tanner L., Enescu M., Bhushan M., Hill E., Franklin J., Anderson E., Sharma R., Schnabel J., Brady M. Personalised estimation of the arterial input function for improved pharmacokinetic modelling of colorectal cancer using dceMRI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2013, Vol. 8198:126-135. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. H. Yoshida, S. Warfield, M. Vannier (Eds.).
18. Kallehauge J.F., Tanderup K., Duan C., Haack S., Pedersen E.M., Lindegaard J.C., Fokdal L.U., Mohamed S.M.I., Nielsen T. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014, 53:1064-1072.
19. Karahaliou A., Vassiou K., Arikidis N., Skiadopoulos S., Kanavou T., Costaridou L. Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. Brit. J. Radiol. 2014, 83:296-309.
20. Krähenbühl P., Koltun V. Efficient inference in fully connected crfs with gaussian edge potentials. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24 2011, 109-117. Curran Associates, Inc. J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. Pereira, K. Weinberger (Eds.).
21. Kumar M., Ton P., Zisserman A. Obj cut. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (ICVPR) 2005, Vol. 1:18-25.
22. Mahapatra D., Schuffler P., Tielbeek J., Makanyanga J., Stoker J., Taylor S., Vos F., Buhmann J. Automatic detection and segmentation of Crohn's disease tissues from abdominal MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2013, 32:2332-2347.
23. McClymont D., Mehnert A., Trakic A., Kennedy D., Crozier S. Fully automatic lesion segmentation in breast MRI using mean-shift and graph-cuts on a region adjacency graph. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014, 39:795-804.
24. Murphy K.P. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective 2012, MIT press.
25. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Syst. 1979, 9:62-66.
26. Papiez B.W., Heinrich M.P., Fehrenbach J., Risser L., Schnabel J.A. An implicit sliding-motion preserving regularisation via bilateral filtering for deformable image registration. Med. Image Anal. 2014, 18:1299-1311.
27. Potesil V., Kadir T., Brady M. Learning new parts for landmark localization in whole-body CT scans. IEEE Trans.Med. Imag. 2014, 33.
28. Shotton J., Winn J., Rother C., Criminisi A. Textonboost for image understanding: Multi-class object recognition and segmentation by jointly modeling texture, layout, and context. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009, 81:2-23.
29. Su P., Yang J., Li H., Chi L., Xue Z., Wong S. Superpixel-Based Segmentation of Glioblastoma Multiforme from Multimodal MR Images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2013, Vol. 8159:74-83. Springer International Publishing. L. Shen, T. Liu, P.-T. Yap, H. Huang, D. Shen, C.-F. Westin (Eds.).
30. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., Evelhoch J.L., Henderson E., Knopp M.V., Larsson H.B.W., Lee T.-Y., Mayr N.A., Parker G.J.M., Others Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999, 10:223-232.