Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 377-383

  Prudente, Marcel S ^a   Davi, Letícia R ^b   Nabbout, Kemilly O ^c   Prado, Célio J ^b   Pereira, Leandro M ^a   Zancopé, Karla ^b   Neves, Flávio D ^b  

^a University Center of Patos de Minas   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^c Private practice   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREC; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMAN; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POWDER; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOOTH CROWN;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; POWDERS; TITANIUM; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85021855382     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. van Noort, R., The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater J 28 (2012), 3–12.
2. Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., Tamaki, Y., A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28 (2009), 44–56.
3. Boitelle, P., Mawussi, B., Tapie, L., Fromentin, O., A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 41 (2014), 853–874.
4. Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., Edelhoff, D., Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204 (2008), 505–511.
5. van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y., Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e43312.
6. Mormann, W.H., Curilović Z., CEREC CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. A case report after 5 years in place. Acta Stomatol Croat 25 (1991), 3–10.
7. Mörmann, W., Krejci, I., Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 23 (1992), 109–115.
8. Mormann, W.H., The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:suppl (2006), 7S–13S.
9. da Costa, J.B., Pelogia, F., Hagedorn, B., Ferracane, J.L., Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 35 (2010), 324–329.
10. Martin, N., Jedynakiewicz, N.M., Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 15 (1999), 54–61.
11. Nakamura, T., Dei, N., Kojima, T., Wakabayashi, K., Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003), 244–248.
12. Neves, F.D., Prado, C.J., Prudente, M.S., Carneiro, T.A., Zancopé K., Davi, L.R., et al. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1134–1140.
13. das Neves, F.D., de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro, T., do Prado, C.J., Prudente, M.S., Zancopé K., Davi, L.R., et al. Micrometric precision of prosthetic dental crowns obtained by optical scanning and computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing system. J Biomed Opt, 19, 2014, 088003.
14. das Neves, F.D., do Prado, C.J., Prudente, M.S., Carneiro, T.A., Zancope, K., Davi, L.R., et al. Microcomputed tomography marginal fit evaluation of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing crowns with different methods of virtual model acquisition. Gen Dent 63 (2015), 39–42.
15. Boeddinghaus, M., Breloer, E.S., Rehmann, P., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19 (2015), 2027–2034.
16. Kurz, M., Attin, T., Mehl, A., Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system. Clin Oral Investig 19 (2015), 2035–2043.
17. Shim, J.S., Lee, J.S., Lee, J.Y., Choi, Y.J., Shin, S.W., Ryu, J.J., Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci 23 (2015), 515–522.
18. Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mormann, W., Attin, T., Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12 (2009), 11–28.
19. Sorensen, J.A., A rationale for comparison of plaque-retaining properties of crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 62 (1989), 264–269.
20. May, L.G., Kelly, J.R., Bottino, M.A., Hill, T., Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater 28 (2012), e99–e109.
21. Baig, M.R., Gonzalez, M.A., Abu Kasim, N.H., Abu Kassim, N.L., Farook, M.S., Effect of operators’ experience and cement space on the marginal fit of an in-office digitally produced monolithic ceramic crown system. Quintessence Int 47 (2016), 181–191.
22. Jahangiri, L., Estafan, D., A method of verifying and improving internal fit of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006), 82–83.
23. Song, X.F., Ren, H.T., Yin, L., Machinability of lithium disilicate glass ceramic in vitro dental diamond bur adjusting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53 (2016), 78–92.
24. McLean, J.W., von Fraunhofer, J.A., The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131 (1971), 107–111.