Effect of operators' experience and cement space on the marginal fit of an in-office digitally produced monolithic ceramic crown system

Quintessence International

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 181-191

  Baig, Mirza Rustum ^a   Gonzalez, Maria Angela G ^b   Kasim, Noor Hayaty Abu ^b   Abu Kassim, Noor Lide ^c   Farook, Mohideen Salihu ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^c INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Cerec; Crown; Digital; Marginal fit

Indexed keywords

CEREC; TOOTH CEMENT;

CERAMICS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOOTH CROWN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BICUSPID; CERAMICS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84984871101     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a34722     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bauer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-511.
2. Tidehag P, Ottosson K, Sjogren G. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in-vitro study. Oper Dent 2014;39:308-316.
3. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003:16:244-248.
4. Akbar J, Petrie C, Walker M, Williams K, Eick J. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006;15:155-163.
5. Mously HA, Finkelman M, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM technology and the heat press technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:249-256.
6. Anadioti E, Aquilino S, Gratton D, et al. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 2014;23:610-617.
7. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-560.
8. An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee J-H, Moon H-S. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intra-oral digital scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1171-1175.
9. Euan R, Figueras-Alvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Oliver-Parra R. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: Influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:155-162.
10. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-1764.
11. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:853-874.
12. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of marginal fit of three marginal designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007;35: 68-73.
13. Lee K-B, Park C-W, Kim K-H, Kwon T-Y. Marginal and internal fir of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J 2008;27:422-426.
14. Yucel MT, Aykent F, Avunduk MC. In-vitro evaluation of marginal fit of different all-ceramic crowns. J Dent Sci 2013;8:225-230.
15. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow: the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:2119-2125.
16. Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MMK, Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:83-87.
17. Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM system or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1134-1140.
18. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of sub-gingival restorations with overhanging or clinically imperfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:563-578.
19. Sorenson JA. A rationale for comparison of plaque retaining properties of crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:264-269.
20. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:853-862.
21. Iwai T, Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Matsumura H. Influence of convergence angles and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:214-218.
22. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns; a systemic review. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:447-454.
23. Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104: 216-227.
24. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:346-355.
25. Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. B Sci Technol Soc 2004;24:177-181.
26. Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:314-325.
27. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:575-584.
28. D'Arcy BL, Omer OE, Byrne DA, Quinn F. The reproducibility and accuracy of internal fit of Cerec 3D CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17:73-77.
29. Boeddinghaus M, Breloer E, Rehmann P, Wostmann B. Accuracy of single-tooth restoration based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients [Epub ahead of print 20 Feb 2015]. Clin Oral Investig.