So you want your research to be relevant? Building the bridge between ecosystem services research and practice

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 26, Issue , 2017, Pages 170-182

  Olander, Lydia ^a   Polasky, Stephen ^b   Kagan, James S ^c   Johnston, Robert J ^d   Wainger, Lisa ^e   Saah, David ^f   Maguire, Lynn ^a   Boyd, James ^g,h   Yoskowitz, David ⁱ  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^g RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

ⁱ TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI   (United States)

Author keywords

Co production; Ecosystem models; Natural capital; Practitioner focused research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021629775     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Abt Associates. 2015. Developing Socio-Economic metrics to measure DOI Hurricane Sandy Project and Program Outcomes. Prepared for NFWF. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/Socio_Economic_Metrics_Final_Report_11DEC2015_0.pdf.
2. Adamus, P., Morlan, J., Verble, K., Manual for the Oregon Rapid Wetland Assessment Protocol (ORWAP). Version 2.0.2. 2010, Oregon Department of State Lands, Salem, OR.
3. Ager, A., Finney, M., McMahan, A., Cathcart, J., Measuring the effect of fuel treatments on forest carbon using landscape risk analysis. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 (2010), 2515–2526.
4. Allen, B.P., Loomis, J.B., The decision to use benefit transfer or conduct original valuation research for benefit-cost and policy analysis. Contemp. Econ. Policy 26 (2008), 1–12.
5. Barbier, E.B., Hacker, S.D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E., Stier, A.C., Silliman, B.R., The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81 (2011), 169–193.
6. Bateman, Ian J., Carson, Richard T., Day, Brett H., Michael Hanemann, W., Hanley, Nick, Hett, Tanis, Jones-Lee, Michael, Loomes, Graham, Mourato, Susana, Özdemiroglu, Ece, Pearce, David W., Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
7. Bateman, I.J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D.N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., De Nocker, L., Ščeponavičiūtė, R., Semėnienė, D., Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environ. Resource Econ. 50 (2011), 365–387.
8. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A.R., Mace, G.M., Watson, R.T., Abson, D.J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B.H., Dugdale, S., Fezzi, C., Foden, J., Hadley, D., Haines-Young, R., Hulme, M., Kontoleon, A., Lovett, A.A., Munday, P., Pascual, U., Paterson, J., Perino, G., Sen, A., Siriwardena, G., van Soest, D., Termansen, M., Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341 (2013), 45–50.
9. Bauer, D.M., Johnston, R.J., The economics of rural and agricultural ecosystem services: purism versus practicality. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 42:1 (2013), iii–xv.
10. Benda, L., Miller, D., Barquin, J., McCleary, R., Cai, T.J., Ji, Y., Building virtual watersheds: a global opportunity to strengthen resource management and conservation. Environ. Manage. 57:3 (2016), 722–739.
11. Blamey, R.K., Bennett, J.W., Louviere, J.J., Morrison, M.D., Rolfe, J.C., Attribute causality in environmental choice modeling. Environ. Resource Econ. 23 (2002), 167–186.
12. Bockstael, N.E., Freeman, A.M., Kopp, R.J., Portney, P.R., Smith, V.K., On measuring economic values for nature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:8 (2000), 1384–1389.
13. Borsuk, M., Clemen, R., Maguire, L., Reckhow, K., Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse river watershed. Group Decis. Negot. 10 (2001), 355–373.
14. Boyd, J., Wainger, L., Landscape indicators of ecosystem service benefits. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84 (2002), 1371–1378.
15. Boyd, J., Krupnick, A., Using ecological production theory to define and select environmental commodities for nonmarket valuation. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 42:1 (2013), 1–32.
16. Boyd, J., Ringold, P., Krupnick, A., Johnston, R.J., Weber, M.A., Hall, K., Ecosystem services indicators: improving the linkage between biophysical and economic analyses. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8 (2016), 359–443.
17. Braat, L.C. (ed.) (2015) Mapping of Ecosystems and their Services in the EU And its Member States (MESEU) SYNTHESIS REPORT 2012–2015. CONTRACT: ENV.B.2/SER/2012/0016. European Commission, Brussels.
18. Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. PNAS 106:5 (2009), 1305–1312, 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 published ahead of print January 28, 2009.
19. Chang, H., Comparative streamflow characteristics in urbanizing basins in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon, USA. Hydrol. Process. 21 (2007), 211–222.
20. Executive Office of the President of the United States 2015. Memorandum for Executive Departments and Agencies on “Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Federal Decision Making. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2016/m-16-01.pdf.
21. Gleason RA, Laubhan MK, Euliss NH Jr (eds). 2008. Ecosystem services derived from wetland conservation practices in the United States prairie pothole region with an emphasis on the United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Reserve and Wetlands Reserve programs. United States Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center paper 110.
22. Goldstein, J.G., Caldarone, T.K., Duarte, D., Ennaanay, N., Hannahs, G., Mendoza, S., Polasky, S.Wolny., Daily, G.C., Integrating ecosystem service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:19 (2012), 7565–7570.
23. Goodkind, A.L., Polasky, S., Taff, S.J., Ecosystem Service Damages from Proposed NorthMet Mine. 2013, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
24. Google Scholar Search. July 18, 2016. (No patents or case law included in search).
25. Griffiths, C., Wheeler, W., Benefit-cost analysis of regulations affecting surface water quality in the United States. Brouwer, R., Pearce, D., (eds.) Cost-Benefit Analysis and Water Resources Management, 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 223–250.
26. Guerry, A., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G.C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M.H., Bateman, I.J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M.W., Folke, C., Hoekstra, J., Kareiva, P., Keeler, B., Li, S., McKenzie, E., Ouyang, Z., Reyers, B., Ricketts, T., Rockström, J., Tallis, H., Vira, B., Natural capital informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 7348–7355.
27. Halofsky, J.E., M.K. Creutzburg, and M.A. Hemstrom. 2014. Integrating Social, Economic, and Ecological Values Across Large Landscapes. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report (PNW-GTR-896), PNW Research Station, Portland, OR. 216 pp. https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr896.pdf.
28. Hanley, N., Hynes, S., Patterson, D., Jobstvogt, N., Economic valuation of marine and coastal ecosystems: is it currently fit for purpose?. J. Ocean Coastal Econ., 2015 2: Article 1.
29. Holland, D.S., Sanchirico, J., Johnston, R.J., Joglekar, D., Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Based Management: Applications to Marine and Coastal Environments. 2010, RFF Press, Washington, DC.
30. Holmes, T.P., Bergstrom, J.C., Huszar, E., Kask, S.B., Orr, F. III, Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration. Ecol. Econ. 49:2 (2004), 19–30.
31. Hurteau, M.D., Hungate, B.A., Koch, G.W., Accounting for risk in valuing forest carbon offsets. Carbon Balance Manage., 4, 2009, 14.
32. “IPBES | Intergovernmental Platform On Biodiversity And Ecosystem Services”. Ipbes.net. N.p., 2016. Web. 18 July 2016.
33. Izaurralde, R.C., Williams, J.R., McGill, W.B., Rosenberg, N.J., Jakas, M.C.Q., Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: Model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol. Model. 192 (2006), 362–384.
34. Johnston, R.J., Thomassin, P.J., Evaluating the environmental valuation reference inventory (EVRI): results from a survey of actual and potential users. Assoc. Environ. Res. Econ. Newslett. 29:1 (2009), 33–38.
35. Johnston, R.J., Rosenberger, R.S., Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J. Econ. Surv. 24 (2010), 479–510.
36. Johnston, R.J., Schultz, E.T., Segerson, K., Besedin, E.Y., Ramachandran, M., Enhancing the content validity of stated preference valuation: the structure and function of ecological indicators. Land Econ. 88:1 (2012), 102–120.
37. Johnston, R.J., Schultz, E.T., Segerson, K., Besedin, E.Y., Ramachandran, M., Stated preferences for intermediate versus final ecosystem services: Disentangling willingness to pay for omitted ecological outcomes. Agric. Res. Econ. Rev. 42:1 (2013), 98–118.
38. Johnston, R.J., Swallow, S.K., Bauer, D.M., Uchida, E., Anderson, C.M., Connecting ecosystem services to land use: implications for valuation and policy. Duke, J.M., Wu, J., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Land Economics, 2014, Oxford University Press, 196–225 chapter 8.
39. Johnston, R.J., Rosenberger, R.S., Rolfe, J., Brouwer, R., Benefit transfer: the present state and future prospects. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands Chapter 24.
40. Johnston, R.J., Wainger, L.A., Benefit transfer for ecosystem service valuation: An introduction to theory and methods. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands Chapter 12.
41. Johnston, R.J., E.Y. Besedin and R. Stapler. 2016a. Enhanced Geospatial Validity for Meta-Analysis and Environmental Benefit Transfer: An Application to Water Quality Improvements. Environmental and Resource Economics (Online First; print version in press).
42. Johnston, R.J., Schultz, E.T., Segerson, K., Besedin, E.Y., Ramachandran, M., Biophysical causality and environmental preference elicitation: evaluating the validity of welfare analysis over intermediate outcomes. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2016, 10.1093/ajae/aaw073; print version in press) Advance Access online, print version in press.
43. Johnston, R.J., K.J. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T.A. Cameron, W.M Hanemann, N. Hanley, M. Ryan, R. Scarpa, R. Tourangeau and C.A. Vossler. 2017. Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (in press).
44. Kentula, M.E., Forward: Monitoring wetlands at the watershed scale. Weltands 27:3 (2007), 412–415.
45. Keeler, B., Polasky, S., Brauman, K.A., Johnson, K.A., Finlay, J.C., O'Neill, A., Kovacs, K., Dalzell, B., Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (2012), 18619–18624.
46. Kline, J.D. and M.J. Mazzotta. 2012. Evaluation of Trade-offs among Ecosystem Services in the Management of Public Lands. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-865. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr865.pdf.
47. Larruca, E.S., Brussard, B.F., Habitat selection and current distribution of the Pygmy Rabbit in Nevada and California. J. Mammol. 89 (2008), 691–699.
48. Lawler, J.J., Lewis, D.J., Nelson, E., Plantinga, A.J., Polasky, S., Withey, J.C., Helmers, D.P., Martinuzzi, S., Pennington, D., Radeloff, V.C., Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the U.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111:20 (2014), 7492–7497.
49. Lipton, D., Lew, D., Wallmo, K., Wiley, P., Dvarskas, A., The evolution of non-market valuation of U.S. coastal and marine resources. J. Ocean Coastal Econ., 2014, 2014.
50. Loiselle, B.A., Howell, C.A., Graham, C.H., Goerck, J.M., Brooks, T., Smith, K.G., Williams, P.H., Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003), 1591–1600.
51. Loomis, J.B., Rosenberger, R.S., Reducing barriers in future benefit transfers: Needed improvements in primary study design and reporting. Ecol. Econ. 60 (2006), 343–350.
52. McComb, G., Lantz, V., Nash, K., Rittmaster, R., International valuation databases: overview, methods and operational issues. Ecol. Econ. 60 (2006), 461–472.
53. Merow, C., Smith, M.J., Edwards, T.C., Guisan, A., McMahon, S.M., Normand, S., Thuiller, W., Wüest, R.O., Zimmermann, N.E., Elith, J., What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models?. Ecography 37 (2014), 1267–1281.
54. Miller, J., Safford, H., Crimmins, M., Thode, A., Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12 (2009), 16–32.
55. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105:28 (2008), 9495–9500.
56. National Ecosystem Services Partnership (NESP), Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook. 2016, National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University, Durham https://nespguidebook.com.
57. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Science Advisory Board (NOAA SAB). 2016. An Assessment of the Use and Potential Use of Ecosystem Service Valuation (ESV) within NOAA A Report from the NOAA Science Advisory Board. Silver Spring, Maryland.
58. The Declaration | Natural Capital Declaration“. 2012. Naturalcapitaldeclaration.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 18 July 2016.
59. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, and J.R. Williams. 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute.
60. Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D.R., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T.H., Shaw, M.R., Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:1 (2009), 4–11.
61. Nelson, J.P., Kennedy, P.E., The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and resource economics: an assessment. Environ. Resource Econ. 42 (2009), 345–377.
62. Ohmann, J.L., Gregory, M.J., Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest- neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A. Can. J. For. Res. 32:4 (2002), 725–741, 10.1139/x02-011.
63. Olander, L., Johnston, R.J., Tallis, H., Kagan, J., Maguire, L., Polasky, S., Urban, D., Boyd, J., Wainger, L., Palmer, M., Best Practices for Integrating Ecosystem Services into Federal Decision Making. 2015, National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University, Durham doi:10.13016/M2CH07.
64. Olander, L., Characklis, G.W., Comer, P., Effron, M., Gunn, J., Holmes, T., Johnston, R., Kagan, J., Lehman, W., Loomis, J., McPhearson, T., Neale, A., Patterson, L., Richardson, L., Ross, M., Saah, D., Sifleet, S., Stockmann, K., Urban, D., Wainger, L., Winthrop, R., Yoskowitz, D., Data and Modeling Infrastructure for National Integration of Ecosystem Services into Decision Making: Expert Summaries. 2016, National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University, Durham.
65. Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Xiao, Y., Polasky, S., Liu, J., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., Rao, E., Jiang, L., Lu, F., Wang, X., Yang, G., Gong, S., Wu, B., Zeng, Y., Yang, W., Daily, G.C., Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital in China. Science 352 (2016), 1455–1459.
66. Paveglio, T.B., Prato, T., Integrating dynamic social systems into assessments of future wildfire losses: an experiential agent-based modeling approach. Dupont, H.C., (eds.) Environmental Management: Systems, Sustainability and Current Issues, 2012, Nova Science Publishers Inc, Hauppauge, NY.
67. Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D., Johnson, K., The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environ. Resource Econ. 48:2 (2011), 219–242.
68. Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Reyers, B., Setting the bar: standards for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 7356–7361.
69. Posner, S. M., E. McKenzie, and T.H. Ricketts. 2016. Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. PNAS 2016 113 (7) 1760–1765.
70. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2011. Report to the President: Sustaining Environmental Capital: Protecting Society and The Economy. Executive Office of the President. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast_sustaining_environmental_capital_report.pdf.
71. Reddy, S., McDonald, R.I., Maas, A.S., Rogers, A., Girvetz, E.H., North, J., Molnar, J., Finley, T., Leathers, G., Dimuro, J.L., Finding solutions to water scarcity: Incorporation ecosystem service values into business planning at The Dow Chemical Company's Freeport, TX facility. Ecosyst. Serv. 12 (2015), 94–107.
72. Ribaudo, M., Greene, C., Hansen, L., Hellerstein, D., Ecosystem services from agriculture: steps for expanding markets. Ecol. Econ. 69:11 (2010), 2085–2092.
73. Rolfe, J., Brouwer, R., Johnston, R.J., Meta-analysis: Rationale, issues and applications. Johnston, R.J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R.S., Brouwer, R., (eds.) Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, 2015, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
74. Rosenberger, R.S. 2015. Benefit transfer validity and reliability. 2015. Chapter 14 in R.J. Johnston, J. Rolfe, R.S. Rosenberger and R. Brouwer, eds. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
75. Rosenberger, R.S., Johnston, R.J., Selection effects in meta-analysis and benefit transfer: avoiding unintended consequences. Land Econ. 85:3 (2009), 410–428.
76. Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H.M., Guerry, A.D., Daily, G.C., Kareiva, P.M., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., Bhagabati, N., Wood, S., Bernhardt, J., Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem services to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ. 115 (2015), 11–21.
77. Santos, C.P., Carollo, C., Yoskowitz, D.W., Gulf of Mexico Ecosystem Service Valuation Database (GecoServ): gathering ecosystem services valuation studies to promote their inclusion in the decision-making process. Mar. Policy 36 (2012), 214–217.
78. Schaefer, M., Goldman, E., Bartuska, A.M., Sutton-Grier, A., Lubchenco, J., Nature as capital: advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 7383–7389.
79. Schultz, E.T., Johnston, R.J., Segerson, K., Besedin, E.Y., Integrating ecology and economics for restoration: using ecological indicators in valuation of ecosystem services. Restor. Ecol. 20:3 (2012), 304–310.
80. Sharp, R. et al. 2015. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
81. Syphard, A.D., Scheller, R.M., Ward, B.C., Spencer, W.D., Strittholt, J.R., Simulating landscape-scale effects of fuels treatments in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 20:3 (2011), 364–383, 10.1071/WF09125.
82. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), Bishop, (eds.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Business and Enterprise, 2012, Earthscan, London and New York.
83. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2009. Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services. A Report of the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-09-012. Washington D.C.
84. Villa, F., Bagstad, K.J., Voigt, B., Johnson, G.W., Portela, R., Honzak, M., Batker, D., A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE 9:3 (2014), 1–18.
85. Wainger, L., Mazzotta, M., Realizing the potential of ecosystem services: a framework for relating ecological changes to economic benefits. Environ. Manage. 48 (2011), 710–733.
86. Wainger, L.A., King, D.M., Mack, R.N., Price, E.W., Maslin, T., Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?. Ecol. Econ. 69:5 (2010), 978–987.
87. Wallmo, K., Lew, D.K., Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: An application of stated preference choice experiments. J. Environ. Manage. 9:7 (2011), 1793–1801.
88. “WAVES| Wealth Accounting And The Valuation Of Ecosystem Services”. Wavespartnership.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 18 July 2016.
89. Wildland Fire Leadership Council, 2011. National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. https://www.doi.gov/wildlandfire/cohesive-strate.
90. Wondzell, S.M., Hemstrom, M.A., Bisson, P.A., Simulating riparian vegetation and aquatic habitat dynamics in response to natural and anthropogenic disturbance regimes in the Upper Grande Ronde River, Oregon, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80:3 (2007), 249–267.
91. Wong, C.P., Jiang, B., Kinzig, A.P., Lee, K.N., Ouyang, Z., Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecol. Lett. 18 (2015), 108–118.
92. Zheng, H., Robinson, B., Liang, Y.-C., Polasky, S., Ma, D.-C., Wang, F.-C., Ruckelshaus, M., Ouyang, Z.-Y., Daily, G.C., The benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional PES (payment for ecosystem service) program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:41 (2013), 16681–16686.