Foreword: Monitoring wetlands at the watershed scale

Wetlands

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 412-415

  Kentula, Mary E ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54149107493     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[412:FMWATW]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Bedford, B. L. 1996. The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:57-68.
2. Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69-76.
3. Fennessy, M. S., A. D. Jacobs, and M. E. Kentula. 2007. A review of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27:543-60.
4. Gwin, S. E., M. E. Kentula, and P. W. Shaffer. 1999. Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles. Wetlands 19:477-89.
5. Heinz Center. 2002. The State of the Nation's Ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Hychka, K. C., D. H. Wardrop, and R. P. Brooks. 2007. Enhancing a landscape assessment: a case study in the Upper Juniata Watershed, Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27: 446-61.
7. Jordan, T. E., M. P. Andrews, R. P. Szuch, D. F. Whigham, D. E. Weller, and A. D. Jacobs. 2007. Comparing functional assessments of wetlands to measurements of soil characteristics and nitrogen processing. Wetlands 27:479-97.
8. Kentula, M. E., S. E. Gwin, and S. M. Pierson. 2004. Tracking changes in wetlands with urbanization: sixteen years of experience in Portland, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 24:734-43.
9. National Research Council. 2001. Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
10. Rheinhardt, R. D., M. M. Brinson, R. R. Cristian, K. H. Miller, and G. F. Meyer. 2007. A reference-based framework for evaluating the ecological condition of stream networks in small watersheds Wetlands 27:524-42.
11. Scozzafava, M. E., T. E. Dahl, C. Faulkner, and M. Price. 2007. Assessing status, trends, and condition of wetlands in the United States. National Wetlands Newsletter 29:24-28.
12. Stevens, D. L., Jr. and S. F. Jensen. 2007. Sampling design, implementation, and analysis for wetland assessment. Wetlands 27:515-23.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. National water quality inventory: 2000 report.. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 841-R-02-001.
14. Wardrop, D. H., M. E. Kentula, S. F. Jensen, D. L. Stevens, Jr., and R. P. Brooks. 2007a. Assessment of wetlands in the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, using the hydrogeomorphic approach. Wetlands 27:432-45.
15. Wardrop, D. H., M. E. Kentula, D. L. Stevens, Jr., S. F. Jensen, and R. P. Brooks. 2007b. Assessment of wetland condition: an example from the Upper Juniata Watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27:416-31.
16. Weller, D. E., D. F. Whigham, and A. D. Jacobs. 2007. Assessing wetland condition using landscape indicators: an example from the Nanticoke watershed in Delaware and Maryland, USA. Wetlands 27:498-514.
17. Whigham, D. F., A. D. Jacobs, D. E. Weller, T. Jordan, E., M. E. Kentula, S. F. Jensen, and D. L. Stevens, Jr. 2007. Combining HGM and EMAP procedures to assess wetlands at the watershed scale - status of flats and non-tidal riverine wetlands in the Nanticoke River watershed, Delaware and Maryland (USA). Wetlands 27:462-78.