Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 459-469

  Jolley, Daniel ^a   Douglas, Karen M ^b  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021442457     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12453     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, M. (1991). Meta-analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one-sided and two-sided messages. Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 390–404. doi:10.1080/10570319109374395
2. Allen, M. (1993). Determining the persuasive of one and two sided messages. In M. Allen & R.W. Preiss (Eds.), Prospects and precautions in the use of meta-analysis. (pp. 101–125). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
3. Allen, M. (1998). Comparing the persuasive effectiveness of one- and two-sided messages. In M. Allen & R.W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Meta-analysis. (pp. 87–98). Cresskil, NJ: Hampton Press.
4. Allen, M., Hale, J., Mongeau, P., Berkowitz-Stafford, S., Stafford, S., Shanahan, W., … Ray, C. (1990). Testing a model of message sidedness: Three replications. Communication Monographs, 57, 275–291. doi: 10.1080/03637759009376203
5. Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39, 184–207. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12000
6. Betsch, C., & Sachse, K. (2013). Debunking vaccination myths: Strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks. Health Psychology, 32, 146–155. doi: 10.1037/a0027387
7. Betsch, C., Renkewitz, F., & Haase, N. (2013). Effect of narrative reports about vaccine adverse events and bias-awareness disclaimers on vaccine decisions: A simulation of an online patient social network. Medical Decision Making, 33, 14–25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12452342
8. Brotherton, R. (2015). Suspicious minds: Why we believe conspiracy theories. London: Bloomsbury.
9. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 157–166. doi: 10.1177/1948550615616170
10. Coady, D. (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
11. Conroy, K., Rosenthal, S. L., Zimet, G. D., Jin, Y., Bernstein, D. I., Glynn, S., Kahn, J. A. (2009). Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake, predictors of vaccination, and self-reported barriers to vaccination. Journal of Women's Health, 18, 1679–1686. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1329
12. Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (in press). Suspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work-related outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, doi: 10.1111/bjop.12212
13. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual impact of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210–221. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222
14. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 544–552. doi: 10.2307/2574765
15. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71, 98–106. doi: 10.1177/0096340215571908
16. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
17. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M. J. (2015). The social, political, environmental and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy. Abingdon, Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis.
18. Downs, J. S., Bruine de Bruin, W., & Fischhoff, B. (2008). Parents' vaccination comprehension and decisions. Vaccine, 26, 1595–1607. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.011
19. Eakin, D. K., Schreiber, T. A., & Sergent-Marshall, S. (2003). Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 29, 813–825. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.813
20. Furnham, A. (1986). The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence. The Journal of General Psychology, 11, 351–357. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1986.9711045
21. Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2010). Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining. (4th Ed.). London, England: Pearson.
22. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publication bottleneck but undermine science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 562–571. doi: 10.1177/1745691612457576
23. Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742. doi: 10.2307/3791630
24. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (methodology in the social sciences). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
25. Health Protection Service (2014). Infectious Diseases, MRR General Information. Retrieved from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/MMR/GeneralInformation
26. Hopfer, S. (2012). Effects of a narrative HPV vaccination intervention aimed at reaching college women: A randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 13, 173–182. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0254-1
27. Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One, 9, e89177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177.
28. Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–36. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12018
29. Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28, 1709–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
30. LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp399
31. Leman, P. (2007). The lure of the conspiracy theory. New Scientist. Retrieved from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19526121.300-the-lure-of-the-conspiracy-theory.html
32. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018
33. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing – therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457686
34. McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637–644. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637
35. McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327–337. doi: 10.1037/h0042026
36. O'Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. In M.E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication yearbook 22. (pp. 209–249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Offit, P. A. (2010). Deadly choices: How the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all. New York, New York, USA: Basic Books.
38. Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174, 817–818. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
39. Pfau, M., & Van Bockern, S. (1994). The persistence of inoculation in conferring resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents: The second year. Human Communication Research, 20, 413–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00329.x
40. Public Health Oregon. (2015). Nonmedical vaccination exemptions. Retrieved from: https://public.health.oregon.gov/PreventionWellness/VaccinesImmunization/GettingImmunized/Pages/non-medical-exemption.aspx
41. Public Policy Polling. (2013). Democrats and Republicans differ on conspiracy theory beliefs. Retrieved from: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_ConspiracyTheories_040213.pdf
42. Reis, H. T., & Lee, K. Y. (2016). Promise, peril and perspective: Addressing concerns about reproducibility in social-personality psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.005
43. Rosnow, R. (1966). Whatever happened to the “Law of Primacy”. Journal of Communication, 16, 10–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00013.x
44. Rosnow, R., & Robinson, E. (1967). Experiments in persuasion. New York: Academic Press.
45. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology. (Vol. 12, pp. 1–36). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
46. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
47. Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In J-W. van Prooijen & P.A.M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics and paranoia: Why people are suspicious about their leaders. (pp. 254–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749–761. doi: 10.1002/acp.1583
49. Swami, V., Nader, I. W., Pietschnig, J., Stieger, S., Tran, U., & Voracek, M. (2012). Personality and individual difference correlates of attitudes toward human rights and civil liberties. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 443–447. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.015
50. Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115.
52. Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2013). “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.
53. Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015). Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836
54. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773. doi: 10.1177/1948550611434786