Clinical Outcomes with Midline Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws Versus Traditional Pedicle Screws in Moving Lumbar Fusions from Hospitals to Outpatient Surgery Centers

Clinical Spine Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2017, Pages E791-E797

  Chin, Kingsley R ^a,b,c   Pencle, Fabio J R ^c   Coombs, André V ^d   Elsharkawy, Mohamed ^d   Packer, Corrine F ^d   Hothem, Elijah A ^c   Seale, Jason A ^c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Less Exposure Surgery Specialists Institute (LESS Institute)   (United States)

^d Less Exposure Surgery (LES) Society   (United States)

Author keywords

cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws; hospital; less exposure surgery; lumbar fusion; outpatient surgery center; traditional pedicle screws

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL BONE TRAJECTORY PEDICLE SCREW SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEDICLE SCREW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; HOSPITAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; OUTPATIENT; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORTICAL BONE; HOSPITALS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; OUTPATIENTS; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85021369809     PISSN: 23800186     EISSN: 23800194     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000436     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:7-17.
2. Lowery GL, Kulkarni SS. Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2000;1:S126-S130.
3. Song T, Hsu WK, Ye T. Lumbar pedicle cortical bone trajectory screw. Chin Med J. 2014;127:3808-3813.
4. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009;9:366-373.
5. Chin KR, Coombs AV, Seale JA. Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient single-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a surgery center: preliminary results in 16 patients. Spine. 2015;40:E36-E42.
6. Lawrence JT, London N, Bohlman HH, et al. Preoperative narcotic use as a predictor of clinical outcome: results following anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:2074-2078.
7. Carneiro AV. Estimating sample size in clinical studies: basic methodological principles. Rev Port Cardiol. 2003;22:1513-1521.
8. Chin KR, Pencle FJR, Kubik J, et al. Avoidance of wrong level surgery in the lumbar spine: report. Spine J. 2015;4:257.
9. Chin KR, Pencle FJR, Coombs AV, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in ambulatory surgery centers: patient selection and outcome measures compared to an in hospital cohort. Spine. 2016;41: 686-692.
10. Oxland TR, Lund T. Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(suppl 1):S95-S101.
11. Wray S, Mimran R, Vadapalli S, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:503-510.
12. Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, et al. Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine. 2013;38:635-641.
13. Amaritsakul Y, Chao CK, Lin J. Comparison study of the pullout strength of conventional spinal pedicle screws and a novel design in full and backed-out insertions using mechanical tests. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2014;228:250-257.
14. Glennie RA, Dea N, Kwon BK, et al. Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:972-975.
15. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, et al. Short-term results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using pedicle screw with cortical bone trajectory compared with conventional trajectory. Asian Spine J. 2015;9:440-448.
16. Kojima K, Asamoto S, Kobayashi Y, et al. Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory - a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157:1173-1178.
17. Gautschi OP, Garbossa D, Tessitore E, et al. Maximal access surgery for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with divergent, cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws: a good option to minimize spine access and maximize the field for nerve decompression. J Neurosurg Sci. 2017;61:335-341.
18. Lee GW, Son J-H, Ahn M-W, et al. The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Spine J. 2015;15:1519-1526.