Maximal access surgery for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with divergent, cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws: A good option to minimize spine access and maximize the field for nerve decompression

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 335-341

  Gautschi, Oliver P ^a   Garbossa, DIego ^b   Tessitore, Enrico ^a   Langella, Francesco ^c   Pecoraro, Michele F ^b   Marengo, Nicola ^b   Bozzaro, Marco ^b   Beckman, Joshua ^d   Berjano, Pedro ^e  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^e IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Pedicle screws; Spinal fusion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATHERECTOMY; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL BONE TRAJECTORY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILLNESS TRAJECTORY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; INTRAOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR SPINE; NERVE DECOMPRESSION; NEUROMONITORING; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION; STANDARDS; SURGERY;

DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 85018334780     PISSN: 03905616     EISSN: 18271855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03230-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Garbossa D, Pejrona M, Damilano M, Sansone V, Ducati A, Berjano P. Pelvic parameters and global spine balance for spine degenerative disease: the importance of containing for the well being of content. Eur Spine J 2014;23(Suppl 6):616-27
2. Berjano P, Damilano M, Langella F, Pejrona M, Lamartina C. Minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Sci 2014;58(2 Suppl 1):81-6.
3. Pejrona M, Berjano P, Cecchinato R, Casella A, Lamartina C. Posterior surgery or lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative deformity? Comparative data. J Neurosurg Sci 2014;58(2 Suppl 1):77-80.
4. Bozzaro M, Tartara F, Ajello M, Fiumefreddo A, Marengo N, Pecoraro F, et al. Surgical challenges of fixed spine: how to restore a fixed imbalance? J Neurosurg Sci 2014;58(2 Suppl 1):97-100.
5. Berjano P, Gautschi OP, Schils F, Tessitore E. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF®): how I do it. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015;157:547-51.
6. Marchi L, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Castro C, Coutinho T, Coutinho E, et al. Lateral interbody fusion for treatment of discogenic low back pain: minimally invasive surgical techniques. Adv Orthop 2012;2012:282068.
7. Tender GC, Serban D. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of two techniques. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014;109:812-21.
8. Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, Brick C, Reid S. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 1988;13:1012-8.
9. Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J. Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:741-9.
10. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 2009;9:366-73.
11. Datta G, McGregor A, Medhi-Zadeh S, Khalil N, Hughes SP. The impact of intermittent retraction on paraspinal muscle function during lumbar surgery. Spine 2010;35:E1050-7.
12. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013;26:E248-53.
13. Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, Uchiyama S, Hara T, Washio T, et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 1997;22:2504-10.
14. Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D. Factors affecting the pullout strength of can-cellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:391-8.
15. Inceoglu S, Montgomery WH Jr, St Clair S, McLain RF. Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:670-6.
16. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 2000;25:2637-45.
17. Villard J, Ryang YM, Demetriades AK, Reinke A, Behr M, Preuss A, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine 2014;39:1004-9.
18. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:694-9.
19. Rodriguez A, Neal MT, Liu A, Somasundaram A, Hsu W, Branch CL. Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation. Neurosurgical Focus 2014;36:E9.