Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Spine

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 686-692

  Chin, Kingsley R ^a,b   Pencle, Fabio J R ^b   Coombs, André V ^c   Brown, Morgan D ^d   Conklin, Kasey J ^a   O'Neill, Andew M ^a   McGarry, Michael J ^a   Seale, Jason A ^b   Hothem, Elijah A ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Less Exposure Surgery Specialists Institutes (LESSi)   (United States)

^c Less Exposure Suregery(LES) Society   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

inpatient; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; outpatient fusion; outpatient surgery; retroperitoneal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84964545090     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001285     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg 2006;88:21-4.
2. Goz V, Weinreb JH, Schwab F, et al. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Spine J 2014;14:2019-27.
3. Mummaneni PV, Whitmore RG, Curran JN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E3.
4. Norton RP, Bianco K, Klifto C, et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1219-27
5. Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, et al. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:143-9.
6. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73:802-8.
7. Resnick DK, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: lumbar fusion for stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:62-6.
8. Scheer JK, Auffinger B, Wong RH, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis in 282 patients: in situ arthrodesis versus reduction. World Neurosurg 2015;84:108-13.
9. Ahmadian A, Verma S, Mundis GM Jr, et al. Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19: 314-20.
10. Barbagallo GM, Albanese V, Raich AL, et al. Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF): comparative effectiveness and safety versus PLIF/TLIF and predictive factors affecting LLIF outcome. Evid Based Spine Care J 2014;5:28-37.
11. Bina RW, Zoccali C, Skoch J, et al. Surgical anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar approach. J Clin Neurosci 2014;456-9.
12. Talia AJ, Wong ML, Lau HC, et al. Comparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:243-51.
13. Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, et al. Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:459-67.
14. Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr. The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: A review. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3(suppl 3):S198-215.
15. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;6:435-43.
16. Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr, et al. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 2011;31:E4.
17. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, et al. Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1681-8.
18. Patel VC, Park DK, Herkowitz HN. Lateral transpsoas fusion: indications and outcomes. Scientific World Journal 2012;2012: 893608.
19. Guerin P, Obeid I, Bourghli A, et al. The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Surg Radiol Anat 2012;34:151-7.
20. Chin KR, Coombs AV, Seale JA. Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient single-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a surgery center: preliminary results in 16 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E36-42.
21. Hofer RE, Kai T, Decker PA, et al. Obesity as a risk factor for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:908-16.
22. Fleisher LA, Fleishmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64: e77-137.
23. Fu KM, Smith JS, Polly DW Jr, et al. Correlation of higher preoperative American Society of Anesthesiology grade and increased morbidity and mortality rates in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:470-4.
24. Suresh KP, Chandrashekara S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. JHumReprodSci 2012;5:7-13.
25. Carneiro AV. Estimating sample size in clinical studies: basic methodological principles. Rev Port Cardiol 2003;22:1513-21.
26. Powell ET 4th, Krengel WF 3rd, King HA, et al. Comparison of same-day sequential anterior and posterior spinal fusion with delayed two-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1256-9.
27. Rosenfeld HE, Limb R, Chan P, et al. Challenges in the surgical management of spine trauma in the morbidly obese patient: a case series. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:101-9.
28. Homsted L. Institute of Medicine report: to err is human: building a safer health care system. Fla Nurse 2000;48:6.
29. Services, U., S.D.o.H.a.H. Medicare Ambulatory Surgical Center-Value Based Purchasing Implementation Plan. Services, U., S.D.o.H.a.H; 2015.
30. Grimm BD, Leas DP, Poletti SC, et al. postoperative complications within the first year after extreme lateral interbody fusion: experience of the first 108 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014.
31. Lee C-S, Chung S-S, Pae Y-R, et al. Mini-open approach for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Asian Spine J 2014;8:491-7.
32. Davis TT, Bae HW, Mok JM, et al. Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4-L5 disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1482-7.
33. Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:139-44.
34. Lee YS, Park SW, Kim YB. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2014;55:248-54.