A technology training protocol for meeting QSEN goals: Focusing on meaningful learning

Nursing Forum

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 20-26

  Luo, Shuhong ^a   Kalman, Melanie ^a  

^a SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

experiential learning; meaningful learning; prior knowledge; procedural understanding; technology training; workflow integration

Indexed keywords

CONVERSATION; EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MODEL; NURSING STUDENT; SAFETY; SKILL; WORKFLOW; CURRICULUM; DEVICE SAFETY; DEVICES; NURSING EDUCATION; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; TEACHING; TRENDS;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, NURSING; TEACHING;

EID: 85021240886     PISSN: 00296473     EISSN: 17446198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12214     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Graduate-Level QSEN Competencies: Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. 2012. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/faculty/qsen/competencies.pdf
2. Russell AL. Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Comput Educ. 1995;25(4):173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(95)00073-9
3. Straub ET. Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Rev Educ Res. 2009;79(2):625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
4. Furlong K. Learning to use an EHR: Nurses’ stories. Can Nurse. 2015;111(5):20–24.
5. Kaufman DR, Furniss SK, Grando MA, Larson DW, Burton MM. A sequential data analysis approach to electronic health record workflow. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;218:40608.
6. Patterson ES, Lowry SZ, Ramaiah M, et al. Improving clinical workflow in ambulatory care: Implemented recommendations in an innovation prototype for the veteran's health administration. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015;3(2):1149. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1149
7. Star JR. Re-conceptualizing procedural knowledge: Flexibility and innovation in equation solving. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA, 2002. https://www.msu.edu/~jonstar/papers/AERA02.pdf
8. Novak JD. Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Sci Educ. 2002;86(4):548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
9. Shuell TJ. Phases of meaningful learning. Rev Educ Res. 1990;60(4):531–547. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004531
10. van der Aalst WMP, Jablonski S. Dealing with workflow change: Identification of issues and solutions. Comput Syst Sci Eng. 2000;5:267–276.
11. Webster J. The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. J Manag. 1995;21(4):757–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100409
12. Felicia P, ed. Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation Through Educational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches. Hershey PA: Information Science Reference; 2011.
13. Bergsteiner H, Avery GC, Neumann R.Kolb's experiential learning model: Critique from a modelling perspective. Stud Contin Educ. 2010;32(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370903534355
14. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
15. Konak A, Clark TK, Nasereddin M. Using Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Comput Educ. 2014;72:11–22.
16. Gosen J, Washbush J. A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulat Gam. 2004;35(2):270–293.
17. McCarthy PR, McCarthy HM. When case studies are not enough: Integrating experiential learning into business curricula. J Educ Bus. 2006;81:201–204.
18. Cornell RM, Johnson CB, Schwartz WC. Enhancing student experiential learning with structured interviews. J Educ Bus. 2013;88(3):136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
19. University of California Davis. 5-Step Experiential Learning Cycle Definitions; 2011. http://www.experientiallearning.ucdavis.edu/module1/el1_40-5step-definitions.pdf
20. Wessa P, Rycker AD, Holliday IE. Content-based VLE designs improve learning efficiency in constructivist statistics education. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025363
21. Palfrey J, Gasser U. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books; 2010.
22. Anderson SE. Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry. 1997;27(3):331–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00057
23. Mayes J, Fowler C. Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interact Comput. 1999;11(5):485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00065-4
24. Wilson BG, ed. Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications; 1996.
25. Hung W, Jonassen DH, Liu R. Problem-based learning. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, van Merrienboer J, Driscoll MP, eds. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. 3rd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008:485–506.
26. Frimpong JA, Jackson BE, Stewart LM, Singh KP, Rivers PA, Bae S. Health information technology capacity at federally qualified health centers: A mechanism for improving quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-35