Efficacy of the doktormitSDM training module in supporting shared decision making − Results from a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 100, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 2331-2338

  Geiger, Friedemann ^a,b   Liethmann, Katrin ^a,c   Reitz, Daniela ^d   Galalae, Razvan ^e,f   Kasper, Jürgen ^g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b University of Applied Sciences and Medical University   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^d Darmstadt Clinic   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^f Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen   (Germany)

^g Department of Pathology   (Norway)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Shared decision making; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHARED DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; VIDEORECORDING;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 85020928487     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Blair, L., Légaré, F., Is shared decision making a utopian dream or an achievable goal?. Patient 8 (2015), 471–476, 10.1007/s40271-015-0117-0.
2. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D.L., Kobrin, S., Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement. Sci., 11, 2016, 114, 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9.
3. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. Brit. Med. J. (Clinical research ed.), 342, 2011, d1745, 10.1136/bmj.d1745.
4. Clayman, M.L., Bylund, C.L., Chewning, B., Makoul, G., Impact of patient participation in health decisions within medical encounters: a systematic review. Med. Decis. Making 36 (2016), 427–452, 10.1177/0272989X15613530.
5. Shay, L.A., Lafata, J.E., Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med. Decis. Making 35 (2015), 114–131, 10.1177/0272989X14551638.
6. Couët, N., Desroches, S., Robitaille, H., Vaillancourt, H., LeBlanc, A., Turcotte, S., Elwyn, G., Légaré, F., Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 18 (2015), 542–561, 10.1111/hex.12054.
7. Elwyn, A., Edwards, P., Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Brit. J. Gen Pract. 50:460 (2000), 892–899.
8. Terzioglu, P., Jonitz, B., Schwantes, U., Burger, W., Kommunikative und soziale Kompetenzen: vermittlung muss im Medizinstudium beginnen.[Communicative and social competencies: teaching must start during medical education]. Dtsch Arztebl, 2003, 458–460.
9. Caldwell, J.G., Evaluating attitudes of first-year residents to shared decision making. Med. Edu. Online 13 (2008), 1–6.
10. Diouf, N.T., Menear, M., Robitaille, H., Painchaud Guérard, G., Légaré, F., Training health professionals in shared decision making: update of an international environmental scan. Patient Educ. Couns., 2016, 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.008.
11. Shepherd, H.L., Barratt, A., Trevena, L., Mc Geechan, K., Carey, K., Epstein, R.M., Butow, P.N., Del Mar, C.B., Entwistle, V., Tattersall, Martin, H.N., Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians can give about treatment options: a cross-over trial. Patient Educ. Couns. 84 (2011), 379–385.
12. Stacey, D., O'Connor, A.M., Graham, I.D., Pomey, M.-P., Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an intervention to implement evidence-based patient decision-support in a nursing call center. J. Telemed. Telecare 12 (2006), 410–415.
13. Härter, A., Buchholz, J., Nicolai, K., Reuter, F., Komarahadi, L., Kriston, B., Kallinowski, W., Shared decision making and the use of decision aids. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 112 (2015), 672–679, 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0672.
14. Cooper, D.L., Roter, K.A., Carson, L.R., Bone, S.M., Larson, E.R., Miller, M.S., Barr, D.M., A randomized trial to improve patient-centered care and hypertension control in underserved primary care patients. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 26 (2011), 1297–1304, 10.1007/s11606-011-1794-6.
15. Légaré, F., Labrecque, M., Cauchon, M., Castel, J., Turcotte, S., Grimshaw, J., Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of anitbiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial. CMAJ 184 (2012), 726–734.
16. Kasper, J., Légaré, F., Scheibler, F., Geiger, F., Turning signals into meaning − ‘Shared decision making' meets communication theory. Health Expect. 15:1 (2012), 3–11.
17. Kasper, J., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Fulcher, G., Geiger, F., Patients’ and observers’ perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One, 6(10), 2011, e26255.
18. Kasper, J., Hoffmann, F., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Geiger, F., MAPPIN'SDM: The multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision making. PLoS One, 7(4), 2012, e34849.
19. Kasper, J., Hoffmann, F., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Geiger, F., Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:4 (2012), 275–283.
20. Geiger, F., Kasper, J., Of blind men and elephants: suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient, physician and observer views. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 106:4 (2012), 284–289.
21. Kienlin, S., Kristiansen, M., Ofstad, E., Liethmann, K., Geiger, F., Joranger, P., Tveiten, S., Kasper, J., Validation of the Norwegian version of MAPPIN'SDM, an observation-based instrument to measure shared decision-making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ. Couns. 100 (2017), 534–541.
22. Kasper, J., Liethmann, K., Reissmann, D., Heesen, C., Geiger, F., Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions –preliminary testing of a newly developed module. Health Expect., 2017 (in press) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12565/abstract.
23. Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Pettigrew, M., Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 50:5 (2013), 587–592.
24. Geiger, F., Liethmann, K., Hoffmann, F., Paschedag, J., Kasper, J., Investigating a training supporting shared decision making (IT'S SDM 2011): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 12 (2011), 1–9.
25. Bunge, M., Mühlhauser, I., Steckelberg, A., What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ. Couns. 78 (2009), 316–328.
26. Légaré, F., Ratté, S., Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Gravel, K., Graham, I.D., Turcotte, S., Interventions for Improving the Adoption of Shared Decision Making by Healthcare Professionals. Intervention Review. 2010, The Cochrane Collaboration, 1–45.
27. Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Hölzel, L.P., Simon, D., Loh, A., Härter, M., The 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q): development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ. Couns. 80 (2010), 94–99.
28. LeBlanc, A., Kenny, D.A., O'Connor, A.M., Légaré, F., Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: a dyadic approach to shared decision making. Med. Decis. Making 29 (2009), 61–68.
29. Geiger, F., Shared Decision Making Als Verhandlung Von Ungewissheiten [Shared Decision Making as a Negotiation of Uncertainties], Doctoral Thesis. 2007, Universität Osnabrück Osnabrück.
30. Liethmann, K., Shared Decision Making: Evaluation Eines Ärztetrainings [Evaluation of a Training Program for Physicians], Doctoral Thesis. 2014, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel.
31. Wirtz, M., Caspar, F., Beurteilerübereinstimmung Und Beurteilerreliabilität: Methoden Zur Bestimmung Und Verbesserung Der Zuverlässigkeit Von Einschätzungen Mittels Kategoriensystemen Und Ratingskalen [Interrater Agreement and Interrater Reliability: Methods to Determine and Improve Reliability of Ratings by Use of Category Systems and Rating Scales]. 2002, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
32. Bortz, J., Schuster, C., Statistik für Human- Und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for Human and Social Scientists]. 7th, 2010, SpringerMedizin, Berlin.
33. Berger-Höger, B., Liethmann, K., Mühlhauser, I., Haastert, B., Steckelberg, A., Informed shared decision making supported by decision coaches for women with ductal carcinoma in situ: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials, 2015, 1–16.