Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: A dyadic approach to shared decision making

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-68

  LeBlanc, Annie ^a   Kenny, David A ^b   O'Connor, Annette M ^c   Légaré, France ^a,d  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Actor partner interdependence model; Decisional conflict; Dyadic decision making; Physician patient relationship; Relationship centered care; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 59549095686     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08327067     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gerrity MS, DeVellis RF, Earp JA Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care: a new measure and new insights. Med Care. 1990 ; 28: 724-36.
2. Gerrity MS, Earp JA Uncertainty and professional work: perceptions of physicians in clinical practice. Am J Sociol. 1992 ; 97: 1022-51.
3. Gerrity MS, White KP, DeVellis RF, Dittus RS Physicians' reactions to uncertainty: refining the constructs and scales. Motiv Emot. 1995 ; 19: 175-91.
4. Janis IL, Mann L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press ; 1977.
5. Carpenito LJ Decisional conflict. In: Carpenito-Moyet LJ, ed. Nursing Diagnosis: Application to Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ; 2000. p 312-21.
6. Nelson WL, Han PK, Fagerlin A., Stefanek M., Ubel PA Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making. 2007 ; 27: 609-18.
7. O'Connor AM, Stacey D., Entwistle V., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003 ; 2: CD001431.
8. Dolan JG A method for evaluating health care providers' decision making: the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument. Med Decis Making. 1999 ; 19: 38-41.
9. Légaré F., Elwyn G., Fishbein M., et al. Translating shared decision-making into health care clinical practices: proof of concepts. Implement Sci. 2008 ; 3: 2.
10. Légaré F., O'Connor A., Graham I., et al. The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physician's decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 ; 50: 211-21.
11. Légaré F., O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Tremblay S. Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the agreement and the difference between patients' and physicians' decisional conflict. Med Decis Making. 2006 ; 26: 373-90.
12. Légaré F., Tremblay S., O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Wells GA, Jacobsen MJ Factors associated with the difference in score between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about hormone therapy: a multilevel regression analysis. Health Expect. 2003 ; 6: 208-21.
13. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press ; 2006.
14. O'Connor AM, Tugwell P., Wells GA, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 1998 ; 33: 267-79.
15. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997 ; 29: 21-43.
16. O'Connor AM Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 ; 15: 25-30.
17. Légaré F., Graham I., O'Connor A., Dolan J., Bélanger-Ducharme F. Prise de décision partagée: traduction et validation d'une échelle de confort décisionnel du médecin. Pédagogie Médicale. 2003 ; 4: 216-22.
18. Kenny DA, Cook W. Partner effects in relationship research: conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Pers Relatsh. 1999 ; 6: 433-48.
19. Kenny DA Models of non-independence in dyadic research. J Soc Pers Relat. 1996 ; 13: 279-94.
20. Bentler PM Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990 ; 107: 238-42.
21. Bollen KA, Long JS Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park (CA): Sage ; 1993.
22. Butler C., Rollnick S., Stott N. The practitioner, the patient and resistance to change: recent ideas on compliance. CMAJ. 1996 ; 154: 1357-62.
23. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. BMJ. 1999 ; 319: 719-20.
24. Pitz GF, Sachs NJ Judgment and decision: theory and application. Ann Rev Psychol. 1984 ; 35: 139-64.
25. Mancini J., Santin G., Chabal F., Julian-Reynier C. Cross-cultural validation of the Decisional Conflict Scale in a sample of French patients. Qual Life Res. 2006 ; 15: 1063-8.
26. Elwyn G., O'Connor A., Stacey D., et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 ; 333: 417.
27. Brown JB, Weston WW, Stewart MA Patient-centred interviewing. Part II: finding common ground. Can Fam Physician. 1989 ; 35: 153-7.