Second language learning explained? SLA across 10 contemporary theories

Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 245-272

  Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020502694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203628942-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Andersen, R. W. (1990). Verbal virtuosity and speakers’ purposes. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the 10th meeting of the Second Language Research Forum (Vol. 1, pp. 1-24). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon’s Department of Linguistics and American English Institute.
2. Atkinson, D. (Ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
4. Cook, V. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research, 7, 103-117.
5. De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual first language acquisition. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
6. DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95-116). New York, NY: Routledge.
9. Ellis, N. C. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of implicit and explicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-319.
10. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
11. Farley, A. P. (2005). Structured input: Grammar instruction for the acquisition oriented classroom. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
12. Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127-165.
13. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
14. Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C.,… Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 (3). doi:10.1017/S0272263114000035
15. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117-142). New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (Eds.). (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33-46). New York, NY: Continuum.
18. Lightbown, P., & Pienemann, M. (1993). Comments on Stephen D. Krashen’s “teaching issues: Formal grammar instruction.” TESOL Quarterly, 27, 717-722.
19. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 167-184.
20. Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Norton, B., & McKinney, C. (2011). Identity and second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 73-94). New York, NY:Routledge.
22. O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63 (Suppl. 1), 1-24.
24. Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32-53). New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
26. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Schumann, J. (1990). Extending the scope of the acculturation/pidginization model to include cognition. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 667-684.
28. Swain, M. (1993). Second language testing and second language acquisition: Is there a conflict with traditional psychometrics? Language Testing, 10, 193-207.
29. VanPatten, B. (1998). Cognitive characteristics of adult second language learners. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages (pp. 105-127). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
30. VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.