Literature-based discovery of new candidates for drug repurposing

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 488-497

  Yang, Hsih Te ^a   Ju, Jiun Huang ^a   Wong, Yue Ting ^a   Shmulevich, Ilya ^b   Chiang, Jung Hsien ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ABCmodel; Drug repurposing; Information extraction; Natural language processing, drug target discovery; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; DRUG REPOSITIONING; HUMAN;

DATA MINING; DRUG REPOSITIONING; HUMANS;

EID: 85020233688     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw030     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Dimasi JA. Risks in new drug development: approval success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001;69:297-307
2. Adams CP, Brantner VV. Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it really 802 million? Health Aff 2006;25:420-8
3. Ashburn TT, Thor KB. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3:673-83
4. Wolff T, Miller T, Ko S. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: an update of the evidence for the US preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:405-72
5. Algra AM, Rothwell PM. Effects of regular aspirin on long-term cancer incidence and metastasis: a systematic comparison of evidence from observational studies versus randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:518-27
6. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, et al. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1397-404
7. Calabrese L, Fleischer AB. Thalidomide: current and potential clinical applications. Am J Med 2000;108:487-95
8. Palumbo A, Facon T, Sonneveld P, et al. Thalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood 2008;111:3968-77
9. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, et al. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D109-14
10. Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;92:414-17
11. Zhu F, Shi Z, Qin C, et al. Therapeutic target database update 2012: a resource for facilitating target-oriented drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D1128-36
12. Davis AP, Murphy CG, Johnson R, et al. The comparative toxicogenomics database: update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D1104-14
13. Andronis C, Sharma A, Virvilis V, et al. Literature mining, ontologies and information visualization for drug repurposing. Brief Bioinform 2011;12:357-68
14. Tari L, Vo N, Liang S, et al. Identifying novel drug indications through automated reasoning. PLoS One 2012;7:e40946
15. Tari LB, Patel JH. Systematic drug repurposing through text mining. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1159:253-67
16. Chen ES, Hripcsak G, Xu H, et al. Automated acquisition of disease-drug knowledge from biomedical and clinical documents: an initial study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:87-98
17. Xu R, Wang Q. Large-scale extraction of accurate drug-disease treatment pairs from biomedical literature for drug repurposing. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:181
18. Debusmann R, Kuhlmann M. Dependency grammar: Classification and exploration. Resource-adaptive cognitive processes. Berlin: Springer, 2010, 365-88
19. De Marneffe M-C, MacCartney B, Manning CD. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In: Proceedings of LREC. 2006, Genoa, Italy, pp. 449-54
20. Culotta A, Sorensen J. Dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 423
21. Bunescu RC, Mooney RJ. A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 724-31
22. Surdeanu M, Harabagiu S, Williams J, et al. Using predicate-argument structures for information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 8-15
23. Chiang JH, Liu HH, Huang YT. Condensing biomedical journal texts through paragraph ranking. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1143-9
24. Chowdhury FM, Lavelli A, Moschitti A. A study on dependency tree kernels for automatic extraction of protein-protein interaction. In: Proceedings of BioNLP 2011 Workshop. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 124-133
25. Swanson DR. Fish oil, Raynaud's syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspect Biol Med 1986;30:7-18
26. Swanson DR. Migraine and magnesium: eleven neglected connections. Perspect Biol Med 1988;31:526-57
27. Iorio F, Bosotti R, Scacheri E, et al. Discovery of drug mode of action and drug repositioning from transcriptional responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:14621-26
28. WHO. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification Index with Defined Daily Doses (DDDs). Oslo: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 2000
29. Cheng F, Li W, Wu Z, et al. Prediction of polypharmacological profiles of drugs by the integration of chemical, side effect, and therapeutic space. J Chem Inf Model 2013;53:753-62
30. Frijters R, van Vugt M, Smeets R, et al. Literature mining for the discovery of hidden connections between drugs, genes and diseases. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000943
31. Kim HJ, Yim GW, Nam EJ, et al. Synergistic effect of COX-2 inhibitor on paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in the human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:81-92
32. Taurin S, Nehoff H, van Aswegen T, et al. A novel role for raloxifene nanomicelles in management of castrate resistant prostate cancer. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014;323594
33. Li B, Gao S, Wei F, et al. Simultaneous targeting of EGFR and mTOR inhibits the growth of colorectal carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep 2012;28:15-20
34. Li J, Xue LY, Hao HL, et al. Rapamycin combined with celecoxib enhanced antitumor effects of mono treatment on chronic myelogenous leukemia cells through downregulating mTOR pathway. Tumor Biol 2014;35:6467-74
35. Kumar BN, Rajput S, Dey KK, et al. Celecoxib alleviates tamoxifen-instigated angiogenic effects by ROS-dependent VEGF/VEGFR2 autocrine signaling. BMC Cancer 2013;13:273
36. Yoshino T, Ohara S, Moriyama H. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:779
37. Legault C, Maki PM, Resnick SM, et al. Effects of tamoxifen and raloxifene on memory and other cognitive abilities: cognition in the study of tamoxifen and raloxifene. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5144-52
38. Pandey D, Banerjee S, Basu M, et al. Memory enhancement by tamoxifen on amyloidosis mouse model. Horm Behav 2016;79:70-3
39. Gupta SC, Sung B, Prasad S, et al. Cancer drug discovery by repurposing: teaching new tricks to old dogs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2013;34:508-517
40. Huang M, Liu J, Zhu X. GeneTUKit: a software for documentlevel gene normalization. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1032-33
41. Wei CH, Kao HY. Cross-species gene normalization by species inference. BMC bioinformatics 2011;12 (Suppl 8):S5
42. Leaman R, Islamaj Dogan R, Lu Z. DNorm: disease name normalization with pairwise learning to rank. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2909-2917
43. Wu C, Gudivada RC, Aronow BJ, et al. Computational drug repositioning through heterogeneous network clustering. BMC Systems Biology 2013;7:S6
44. Grando SA. Connections of nicotine to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14:419-429
45. Kim J-D, Ohta T, Pyysalo S, et al. Overview of BioNLP'09 shared task on event extraction. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Shared Task. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 1-9
46. Sarafraz F, Nenadic G. Using SVMs with the command relation features to identify negated events in biomedical literature. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 78-85
47. Cruz Díaz NP, Maña López MJ, Vázquez JM, et al. A machinelearning approach to negation and speculation detection in clinical texts. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2012;63:1398-1410