Simple Factorial Tweezers for Detecting Delicate Serial and Parallel Processes

Mathematical Models of Perception and Cognition Volume I

Volumn 1, Issue , 2021, Pages 77-106

  Fifić, Mario ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020030576     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315647272-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Agliari, E., Barra, A., Galluzzi, A., Guerra, F., Tantari, D., & Tavani, F. (2015). Hierarchical neural networks perform both serial and parallel processing. Neural Networks, 66, 22-35.
2. Anderson, M. J., & Whitcomb, P. J. (2000). DOE simplified: Practical tools for effective experimentation. Portland, OR: Productivity.
3. Burrows, D., & Okada, R. (1971). Serial position effects in high-speed memory search. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 305-308.
4. Caplan, D. (2009). Experimental design and interpretation of functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive processes. Human Brain Mapping, 30(1), 59-77.
5. Clifton, C., & Birenbaum, S. (1970). Effect of serial position and delay of probe in a memory scan task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86(1), 69-76.
6. Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). Over die snelheid van psychische processen (trans. W. G. Koster). Acta Psychologica, 30, 412-431.
7. Dzhafarov, E. N., Schweickert, R., & Sung, K. (2004). Mental architectures with selectively influenced but stochastically interdependent components. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 51-64.
8. Egeth, H., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 551-560.
9. Eidels, A., Townsend, J. T., & Pomerantz, J. R. (2008). Where similarity beats redundancy: The importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1441-1463.
10. Fifić, M. (2006). Emerging holistic properties at face value: Assessing characteristics of face perception (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
11. Fifić, M. (2014). Double jeopardy in inferring cognitive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1130).
12. Fifić, M., Little, D. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2010). Logical-rule models of classification response times: A synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Psychological Review, 117, 309-348.
13. Fifić, M., Nosofsky, R. M., & Townsend, J. T. (2008). Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: A validation test of the Systems Factorial Technology. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 356-375.
14. Fifić, M., & Townsend, J. T. (2010). Information-processing alternatives to holistic perception: Identifying the mechanisms of secondary-level holism within a categorization paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1290-1313.
15. Fific, M., Townsend, J. T., & Eidels, A. (2008). Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 583-603.
16. Forrin, B., & Cunningham, K. (1973). Recognition time and serial position of probed item in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99 (2), 272-279.
17. Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 99-108.
18. Houpt, J. W., Blaha, L. M., McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2014). Systems Factorial Technology with R. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 307-330.
19. Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2010). The statistical properties of the survivor interaction contrast. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 446-453.
20. Ingvalson, E. M., & Wenger, M. J. (2005). A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 14-35.
21. Johnson, S. A., Blaha, L. M., Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2010). Systems Factorial Technology provides new insights on global-local information processing in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 53-72.
22. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lewis-Peacock, J., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2012). Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 61-79.
24. Lisman, J. E., & Idiart, M. A. (1995). Storage of 7 ± 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles. Science, 267(5203), 1512-1515.
25. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Denton, S. E. (2011). Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1-27.
26. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Donkin, C., & Denton, S. E. (2013). Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 801-820.
27. Liu, C. C., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond good- ness-of-fit measures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 190-203.
28. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1999). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 411-421.
30. Oberauer, K., & Bialkova, S. (2009). Accessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 64-87.
31. Pooresmaeili, A., Bach, D. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). The effect of visual salience on memory-based choices. Journal of Neurophysiology, 111(3), 481-487.
32. Posner, M. I., & Taylor, R. L. (1969). Subtractive method applied to separation of visual and name components of multiletter arrays. Acta Psychologica, 30, 104114.
33. Raftery, A. E., Gelman, A., Rubin, D. B., & Hauser, R. M. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-184.
34. Raghavachari, S., Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., Caplan, J. B., Kirschen, M. P., Bourgeois, B., . . . Lisman, J. E. (2001). Gating of human theta oscillations by a working memory task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(9), 3175-3183.
35. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
36. Rushworth, M. F. S., Kolling, N., Sallet, J., & Mars, R. B. (2012). Valuation and decision-making in frontal cortex: One or many serial or parallel systems? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 946-955.
37. Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105-139.
38. Schweickert, R., Fisher, D. L., & Goldstein, W. M. (2010). Additive factors and stages of mental processes in task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 405-414.
39. Schweickert, R., Fisher, D. L., & Sung, K. (2012). Discovering cognitive architecture by selectively influencing mental processes. Singapore: World Scientific.
40. Schweickert, R., Giorgini, M., & Dzhafarov, E. (2000). Selective influence and response-time cumulative distribution functions in serial-parallel task networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 504-535.
41. Schweickert, R., & Townsend, J. T. (1989). A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks. Journal ofMathematical Psychology, 33, 328-347.
42. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
43. Sternberg, S. (1967). Retrieval of contextual information from memory. Psycho- nomic Science, 8(2), 55-56.
44. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning:Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 4, 421-457.
45. Sung, K. (2008). Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: Evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1372-1388.
46. Townsend, J. T. (1969, April). Mock parallel and serial models and experimental detection of these. (Paper presented at the Purdue Centennial Symposium on Information Processing, West Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue University).
47. Townsend, J. T. (1971a). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. Pèrception & Psychophysics, 10, 161-163.
48. Townsend, J. T. (1971b). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50.
49. Townsend, J. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168-199.
50. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Townsend, J. T., & Fifić, M. (2004). Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 953-962.
52. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal ofMathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359.
53. Townsend, J. T., & Schweickert, R. (1985). Interactive effects of fctors prolonging processes in latent mental networks. In G. d'Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognition, Information Processing, and Motivation, Vol.3(pp.255-276).XXIIIInternationalCongress of Psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland.
54. Townsend, J. T., & Thomas, R. D. (1994). Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: Effects on systems factorial interactions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 1-34.
55. Verwey, W. B., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2015). Acognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 54-77.
56. Ward, L. M. (2003). Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(12), 553-559.
57. Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
58. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Faces as gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 229284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). On the costs and benefits of faces and words: Process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 755-779.
60. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 121-138.
61. Yang, C.-T. (2011). Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1708-1728.
62. Yang, C.-T., Chang, T.-Y., & Wu, C.-J. (2013). Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1365-1385.
63. Yang, H., Fifić, M., & Townsend, J. T. (2014). Survivor interaction contrast wiggle predictions of parallel and serial models for an arbitrary number of processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, 21-32.