Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department: A Guiding Framework for Clinicians

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 688-695

  Probst, Marc A ^a   Kanzaria, Hemal K ^b   Schoenfeld, Elizabeth M ^c   Menchine, Michael D ^d   Breslin, Maggie ^e   Walsh, Cheryl ^h   Melnick, Edward R ^f   Hess, Erik P ^g  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Cardozo Law School   (United States)

^f YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^h NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONVERSATION; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; EQUIPOISE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; SHARED DECISION MAKING; UNCERTAINTY; CASE REPORT; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; ETHICS; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MANPOWER; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; THERAPEUTIC EQUIPOISE;

EID: 85019705168     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: 10976760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.063     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Morganti, K.G., Bauhoff, S., Blanchard, J., et al. The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States. 2013, RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA.
2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
3. Frosch, D.L., Kaplan, R.M., Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med 17 (1999), 285–294.
4. Kanzaria, H.K., Brook, R.H., Probst, M.A., et al. Emergency physician perceptions of shared decision-making. Acad Emerg Med 22 (2015), 399–405.
5. Probst, M.A., Kanzaria, H.K., Frosch, D.L., et al. Perceived appropriateness of shared decision-making in the emergency department: a survey study. Acad Emerg Med 23 (2016), 375–381.
6. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Shared decision making (SDM) in the emergency department: development of a policy-relevant, patient-centered research agenda. Available at: http://www.saem.org/annual-meeting/future-past-meetings/saem16/2016-consensus-conference. Accessed August 1, 2016.
7. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Rollnick, S., Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implement Sci, 4, 2009, 75.
8. Hess, E.P., Knoedler, M.A., Shah, N.D., et al. The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5 (2012), 251–259.
9. Spiro, D.M., Tay, K.Y., Arnold, D.H., et al. Wait-and-see prescription for the treatment of acute otitis media: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 296 (2006), 1235–1241.
10. Hess, E.P., Coylewright, M., Frosch, D.L., et al. Implementation of shared decision making in cardiovascular care: past, present, and future. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 7 (2014), 797–803.
11. Smith-Bindman, R., Aubin, C., Bailitz, J., et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 371 (2014), 1100–1110.
12. Flynn, D., Nesbitt, D.J., Ford, G.A., et al. Development of a computerised decision aid for thrombolysis in acute stroke care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 15, 2015, 6.
13. Veroff, D., Marr, A., Wennberg, D.E., Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions. Health Aff (Millwood) 32 (2013), 285–293.
14. Simon, J.R., Refusal of care: the physician-patient relationship and decisionmaking capacity. Ann Emerg Med 50 (2007), 456–461.
15. Coylewright, M., Branda, M., Inselman, J.W., et al. Impact of sociodemographic patient characteristics on the efficacy of decision aids: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 7 (2014), 360–367.
16. Hudak, P.L., Frankel, R.M., Braddock, C. 3rd, et al. Do patients' communication behaviors provide insight into their preferences for participation in decision making?. Med Decis Making 28 (2008), 385–393.
17. Davis, M.A., Hoffman, J.R., Hsu, J., Impact of patient acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision making. Acad Emerg Med 6 (1999), 781–785.
18. Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 94 (2014), 291–309.
19. Flynn, D., Knoedler, M.A., Hess, E.P., et al. Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 19 (2012), 959–967.
20. Anderson, R.T., Montori, V.M., Shah, N.D., et al. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials, 15, 2014, 166.
21. Hess, E.P., Wyatt, K.D., Kharbanda, A.B., et al. Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials, 15, 2014, 253.
22. Melnick, E.R., Lopez, K., Hess, E.P., et al. Back to the bedside: developing a bedside aid for concussion and brain injury decisions in the emergency department. EGEMS, 3, 2015, 1136.
23. Amsterdam, E.A., Wenger, N.K., Brindis, R.G., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 130 (2014), 2354–2394.
24. Dubov, A., Ethical persuasion: the rhetoric of communication in critical care. J Eval Clin Pract 21 (2015), 496–502.
25. Oshima Lee, E., Emanuel, E.J., Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368 (2013), 6–8.
26. Elwyn, G.T., Montori, V.M., The ethical imperative for shared decision-making. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc 1 (2012), 129–131.
27. Katz, S.J., Hawley, S., The value of sharing treatment decision making with patients: expecting too much?. JAMA 310 (2013), 1559–1560.
28. Melnick, E.R., Shafer, K., Rodulfo, N., et al. Understanding overuse of computed tomography for minor head injury in the emergency department: a triangulated qualitative study. Acad Emerg Med 22 (2015), 1474–1483.
29. Beckman, H.B., Markakis, K.M., Suchman, A.L., et al. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med 154 (1994), 1365–1370.
30. Hargraves, I., LeBlanc, A., Shah, N.D., et al. Shared decision making: the need for patient-clinician conversation, not just information. Health Aff (Millwood) 35 (2016), 627–629.
31. Legare, F., Thompson-Leduc, P., Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 96 (2014), 281–286.
32. Quinn, J., McDermott, D., Stiell, I., et al. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 47 (2006), 448–454.
33. Huff, J.S., Decker, W.W., Quinn, J.V., et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Ann Emerg Med 49 (2007), 431–444.