Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions

Health Affairs

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 285-293

  Veroff, David ^a   Marr, Amy ^b   Wennberg, David E ^c  

^a HEALTH DIALOG   (United States)

^b Health Dialog   (United States)

^c Northern New England Accountable Care Collaborative   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DIETITIAN; E-MAIL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEART SURGERY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PHARMACIST; REGISTERED NURSE; RESPIRATORY THERAPIST; TELECONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

COST CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84874771855     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0941     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr., Ziniel S, et al. The DECISIONS study: a nationwide survey of United States adults regarding 9 common medical decisions. Med Decis Making. 2012;30(5 Suppl):20S-34S.
2. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Couper MP, Singer E, Ubel PA, Zineil S, Fowler FJ Jr., et al. Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(5 Suppl):85S-95S.
3. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681-92.
4. Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. Health care decision making [Internet]. Lebanon (NH): The Institute; [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~cecs/decision_making.html
5. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;23:w96-114. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.w96.
6. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10):CD001431.
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare program; Medicare shared savings: accountable care organizations: proposed rule. Fed Regist [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Apr 7;76(57): 19527-654 [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: https://federal register.gov/a/2011-7880
8. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Health care innovation challenge: cooperative agreement: initial announcement [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2011 Nov 14 [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.innovations.cms.gov/Files/x/Health-Care-Innovation-Challenge-Funding-Opportunity-Announcement.pdf
9. Kuehn B. States explore shared decision making. JAMA. 2009; 301(24):2539-41.
10. Shared Decision-Making Study Group. Final report: the practice and impact of shared decision-making [Internet]. Augusta (ME): Maine Quality Forum; 2011 Feb [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: http://mainequalityforum.gov/SDM_ Final_Report_02282011.pdf
11. National Quality Forum. Back pain: shared decision making [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Forum; [cited 2012 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/Measure Details.aspx?actid=0& SubmissionId=1267#k=shared+ decision+making
12. National Committee for Quality Assurance.Washington (DC): NCQA. Press release, New NCQA program will recognize excellence in caring for back pain. 2007 Jan 18.
13. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. The CAHPS improvement guide: practical suggestions for improving the patient care experience [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012 Jun 27 [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.facs.org/ahp/cahps/improvement-guide.pdf
14. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: aligning incentives in Medicare. Washington (DC): MedPAC; 2010 Jun.
15. American Medical Association. Getting the most for our health care dollars: shared decision-making [Internet]. Chicago (IL): AMA; [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/health-care-costs/shared-decisionmaking. pdf
16. National Priorities Partnership. Input to the secretary of health and human services on priorities for the national quality strategy [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Quality Forum; [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?ItemID=68238
17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
18. Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Patients' preferences matter: stop the silent misdiagnosis [Internet]. London: King's Fund; 2012. [cited 2012 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/patients-preferences-matter-may-2012.pdf
19. Wennberg DE, Marr A, Lang L, O'Malley S, Bennett GB. A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1245-55.
20. Cassarett D, Karlawish JHT, Sugarman J. Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications. JAMA. 2000;283:2275-80.
21. Miller FG, Emanuel EJ. Qualityimprovement research and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2008;358: 765-7.
22. To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online
23. These decision aids were developed by Health Dialog and the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. See Informed Medical Decisions Foundation [home page on the Internet]. Boston (MA): The Foundation; [cited 2012 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.informedmedicaldecisions.org
24. Stokes ME, David CS, Koch GG. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 2000.
25. Alston C, Paget L, Halvorson G, Novelli B, Guest J, McCabe P, et al. Communicating with patients on health care evidence [Internet]. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2012 Sep [cited 2012 Dec 21]. (Discussion Paper). Available from: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Perspectives-Files/2012/Discussion-Papers/VSRT-Evidence.pdf
26. Arterburn D, Wellman R, Westbrook E, Rutter C, Ross T, McCulloch D, et al. Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(9):2094-104.