Dual equipoise shared decision making: Definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions

Implementation Science

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Elwyn, Glyn ^a   Frosch, Dominick ^b   Rollnick, Stephen ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72849148724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-75     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. G Elwyn A O'Connor D Stacey R Volk A Edwards A Coulter R Thomson A Barratt M Barry S Bernstein P Butow A Clarke V Entwistle D Feldman-Stewart M Holmes-Rovner H Llewellyn-Thomas N Moumjid A Mulley C Ruland K Sepucha A Sykes T Whelan, BMJ 2006 333 417 421
2. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. H Bekker JG Thornton CM Airey JB Connelly J Hewison MB Robinson J Lilleyman M Macintosh AJ Maule AD Pearman, Health Technology Assessment 1999 3 1
3. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. DL Frosch RM Kaplan, Am J Prev Med 1999 17 285 294
4. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: defining the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. G Elwyn A Edwards P Kinnersley R Grol, BJGP 2000 50 892 899
5. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. CA Barry CP Bradley N Britten FA Stevenson N Barber, BMJ 2000 320 1246 1250 (Pubitemid 30240475)
6. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. NC Campbell E Murray J Darbyshire J Emery A Farmer F Griffiths B Guthrie H Lester P Wilson AL Kinmonth, BMJ 2007 455 459
7. Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences. MJ Barry AG Mulley Jr FJ Fowler JW Wennberg, JAMA 1988 259 3010 3017
8. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. JE Wennberg, BMJ 2002 325 961 964
9. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. JE Wennberg ES Fisher JS Skinner, Health Affairs 2002 96 114
10. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. GH Guyatt AD Oxman G Vist R Kunz Y Falck-Ytter P Alonso-Coello HJ Schünemann for the GRADE Working Group, BMJ 2008 336 924 926
11. Shared Decision-Making Programs. Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making, Inc. 1997 http://www.dartmouth.edu/dms/cecs/fimdm/
12. Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug treatments. The influence of framing, medium, and rater variables. AM O'Connor NF Boyd DL Tritchler Y Kriukov H Sutherland JE Till, Medical Decision Making 1985 5 453 463
13. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. AM O'Connor P Tugwell GA Wells T Elmslie E Jolly G Hollingworth R McPherson H Bunn I Graham E Drake, Patient Education and Counseling 1998 33 267 279 (Pubitemid 28168092)
14. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [Cochrane Review]. AM O'Connor D Stacey V Entwistle H Llewellyn-Thomas D Rovner M Holmes-Rovner V Tait J Tetroe V Fiset M Barry J Jones, Update Software Oxford 2003
15. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). G Elwyn AM O'Connor C Bennett RG Newcombe M Politi MA Durand E Drake N Joseph-Williams S Khangura A Saarimaki S Sivell M Stiel SJ Bernstein N Col A Coulter K Eden M Härter MH Rovner N Moumjid D Stacey R Thomson T Whelan T van der Weijden A Edwards, PLoS One 2009 4 4705
16. Public involvement in guideline development. A Boivin F Légaré CMAJ 2007 176 1308 1309
17. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. M Krahn G Naglie, JAMA 2008 300 436 438
18. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. AM O'Connor F Légaré D Stacey, BMJ 2003 327 736 740
19. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. AM O'Connor HA Llewellyn-Thomas AB Flood, Health Aff (Millwood) 2004 63 72
20. Towards the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. AM O'Connor JE Wennberg F Legare HA Llewellyn-Thomas BW Moulton KR Sepucha AG Sodano JS King, Health Affairs 2007 26 716 725
21. Extending the P4P agenda, part 1: how Medicare can improve patient decision making and reduce unnecessary care. JE Wennberg AM O'Connor ED Collins JN Weinstein, Health Affairs 2007 26 1564 1574
22. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. A Winterbottom HL Bekker M Conner A Mooney, Soc Sci Med 2008 67 2079 2088
23. G Gigerenzer P Todd, Simple heuristics that make us smart New York: Oxford University Press 1999
24. On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. A Dijksterhuis MW Bos LF Nordgren RB van Baaren, Science 2006 311 1005 1007
25. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? JF Waljee MAM Rogers AK Alderman, Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007 25 1067 1073
26. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. B Fisher S Anderson J Bryant RG Margolese M Deutsch ER Fisher JH Jeong N Wolmark, N Engl J Med 2002 347 1233 1241
27. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. U Veronesi N Cascinelli L Mariani, et al. N Engl J Med 2002 347 1227 1232
28. 'It's a maybe test': men's experiences of PSA testing in primary care. R Evans A Edwards G Elwyn E Watson J Austoker R Grol, BJGP 2005 303-10 303 310
29. Internet patient decision support: a randomized controlled trial comparing alternative approaches for men considering prostate cancer screening. DL Frosch V Bhatnagar S Tally CJ Hamori RM Kaplan, Arch Intern Med 2008 168 363 369
30. Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids for patients: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. R Evans A Edwards J Brett M Bradburn E Watson J Austoker G Elwyn, Patient Education and Counseling 2004 58 13 26
31. Investing in deliberation: defining and developing decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. G Elwyn D Frosch A Volandes A Edwards V Montori, John M Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communication: White Paper Series. Gaithersberg, Maryland, USA 2009
32. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AM O'Connor C Bennett D Stacey MJ Barry NF Col KB Eden V Entwistle V Fiset M Holmes-Rovner S Khangura H Llewellyn-Thomas DR Rovner, Med Decis Making 2007 27 554 574
33. CE Schneider, The practice of autonomy: patients, doctors, and medical decisions New York: Oxford University Press 1998
34. Consultations about changing behaviour. R Rollnick CC Butler J McCambridge P Kinnersley G Elwyn K Resnicow, BMJ 2005 331 961 963
35. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. T Bodenheimer K Lorig H Holman K Grumbach, JAMA 2002 288 2469 2475
36. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. H Holman K Lorig, BMJ 2000 320 526 527
37. Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement: two randomized trials. K Lorig PL Ritter F Villa JD Piette, Diabetes Care 2008 31 408 414
38. The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia. KR Lorig PL Ritter DD Laurent K Plant, Arthritis Rheum 2008 59 1009 1017
39. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. MA Durand M Stiel J Boivin G Elwyn, Patient Educ Couns 2008 71 125 35
40. Using decision making theory to inform clinical practice. H Bekker, Shared Decision Making Evidence Based Patient Choice in Healthcare Oxford: Oxford University Press, Edwards A, Elwyn G, 2009 45 51