Big data oriented root cause identification approach based on Axiomatic domain mapping and weighted association rule mining for product infant failure

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 109, Issue , 2017, Pages 253-265

  He, Yihai ^a   Zhu, Chunling ^a   He, Zhenzhen ^a   Gu, Changchao ^a   Cui, Jiaming ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Axiomatic domain mapping; Big data; Product infant failure; Root cause identification; WARM

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION RULES; BIG DATA; COMPUTATION THEORY; DATA MINING; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); MAPPING; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

COMPLICATED PRODUCTS; DOMAIN MAPPING; FORMATION MECHANISM; PRODUCT-LIFE-CYCLE; ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS; ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFICATION; WARM; WEIGHTED ASSOCIATION RULES;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 85019412034     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., Swami, A., Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proc. ACMSIGMOD record, vol. 22, 1993, ACM, 207–216.
2. Cai, B., Zhao, Y., Liu, H., Xie, M., A data-driven fault diagnosis methodology in three-phase inverters for PMSM drive systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 32:7 (2016), 5590–5600.
3. Chen, T., Zheng, S., Luo, H., Liu, X., Feng, J., Reliability analysis of multiple causes of failure in presence of independent competing risks. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32:2 (2016), 363–372.
4. Cheng, C.W., Lin, C.C., Leu, S.S., Use of association rules to explore cause–effect relationships in occupational accidents in the Taiwan construction industry. Safety Science 48 (2010), 436–444.
5. Daniel, E.O., Artificial intelligence and big data. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28 (2013), 96–99.
6. Daniel, K., Horst, L., Jürgen, P., Advanced Bayesian estimation of Weibull early life failure distributions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 30 (2014), 363–373.
7. David, L.R., A practical guideline for successful root cause failure analysis. Proceedings of the thirty-sixth turbomachinery symposium, 2007, 149–156.
8. Elimelech, O., Stern, R., Kalech, M., Bar-Zeev, Y., Diagnosing resource usage failures in multi-agent systems. Expert Systems with Applications 77 (2017), 44–56.
9. He, Y.H., Wang, L.B., He, Z.Z., Xie, M., A fuzzy TOPSIS and rough set based approach for mechanism analysis of product infant failure. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 47 (2016), 25–37.
10. Jeon, J., Sohn, S.Y., Product failure pattern analysis from warranty data using association rule and Weibull regression analysis: A case study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 133 (2015), 176–183.
11. Jiang, R., Murthy, D.N.P., Impact of quality variations on product reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 (2009), 490–496.
12. Kang, S., Kim, E., Shim, J., Cho, S., Chang, W., Kim, J., Mining the relationship between production and customer service data for failure analysis of industrial products. Computers & Industrial Engineering 106 (2017), 137–146.
13. Kumar, V., Mathur, P., Sahni, R., Anand, M., Two-dimensional multi-release software reliability modeling for fault detection and fault correction processes. International Journal of Reliability Quality & Safety Engineering 23:3 (2016), 164–178.
14. Kyungmee, O.K., Effects of manufacturing defects on the device failure rate. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 42 (2013), 481–495.
15. Lee, J., The revolutionary transformation and value creation in INDUSTRY 4.0 Era. 2015, China Machine Press, Beijing, China.
16. Lee, H., Cha, J.H., Pulcini, G., Modeling discrete bivariate data with applications to failure and count data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2017, 10.1002/qre.2118.
17. Li, J., Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., Big data in product lifecycle management. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81 (2015), 667–684.
18. Li, Z., Xiao, F., Fei, L., Mahadevan, S., Deng, Y., An evidential failure mode and effects analysis using linguistic terms. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 10.1002/qre.2075.
19. Liao, T.W., An investigation of a hybrid CBR method for failure mechanisms identification. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17 (2004), 123–134.
20. Lopez-Soto, D., Yacout, S., Angel-Bello, F., Root cause analysis of familiarity biases in classification of inventory items based on logical patterns recognition. Computers & Industrial Engineering 93 (2016), 121–130.
21. Mallik, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Maulik, U., RANWAR: rank-based weighted association rule mining from gene expression and methylation data. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience 14:1 (2015), 59–66.
22. Masayuki, N., Kensuke, T., Kenji, I., Three typical failure scenarios of the mind process of design from the Axiomatic Design perspective. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 58:1 (2009), 165–168.
23. Meeker, W.Q., Hong, Y., Reliability meets big data: opportunities and challenges. Quality Engineering 26 (2014), 102–116.
24. Milos, F., IPICA_Lite—Improvements to root cause analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 131 (2014), 1–13.
25. Moharana, U.C., Sarmah, S.P., Determination of optimal order-up to level quantities for dependent spare parts using data mining. Computers & Industrial Engineering 95 (2016), 27–40.
26. Montgomery, C., Big data and the quality profession. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30, 2014 447-447.
27. Pearn, W.L., Hong, J.S., Tai, Y.T., The burn-in test scheduling problem with batch dependent processing time and sequence dependent setup time. International Journal of Production Research 51 (2013), 1694–1706.
28. Pears, R., Yun, S.K., Dobbie, G., Yeap, W., Weighted association rule mining via a graph based connectivity model. Information Sciences 218 (2013), 61–84.
29. Suh, N.P., Complexity: Theory and applications. 2005, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
30. Verma, A., Khan, S.D., Maiti, J., Krishna, O.B., Identifying patterns of safety related incidents in a steel plant using association rule mining of incident investigation reports. Safety Science 70 (2014), 89–98.
31. William, J.R., Using a new bathtub curve to correlate quality and reliability. Microelectronics Reliability 52 (2012), 2864–2869.
32. Xie, M., Tang, Y., Goh, T.N., A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 76 (2002), 279–285.
33. Yun, S.K., Pears, R., Yeap, W., Valency based weighted association rule mining. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6118 (2010), 274–285.
34. Zeng, H., Lan, T., Chen, Q., Five and four-parameter lifetime distributions for bathtub-shaped failure rate using perks mortality equation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 152 (2016), 307–315.
35. Zhang, L.L., Identifying mapping relationships between functions and technologies with association rule mining. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 25 (2012), 496–508.