Comparison of male vs female resident milestone evaluations by faculty during emergency medicine residency training

JAMA Internal Medicine

Volumn 177, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 651-657

  Dayal, Arjun ^a   O'Connor, Daniel M ^b   Qadri, Usama ^a   Arora, Vineet M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXISM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; SEXISM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85018947038     PISSN: 21686106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9616     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Edmunds LD, Ovseiko PV, Shepperd S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? a narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2948-2958.
2. Wehner MR, Nead KT, Linos K, Linos E. Plenty of moustaches but not enough women: Cross sectional study of medical leaders. BMJ. 2015;351: H6311.
3. Kuhn GJ, Abbuhl SB, Clem KJ; Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Taskforce forWomen in Academic Emergency Medicine. Recommendations from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Taskforce on women in academic emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):762-767.
4. Cydulka RK, D'Onofrio G, Schneider S, Emerman CL, Sullivan LM.Women in academic emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(9):999-1007.
5. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of academic medical faculty. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2120-2121.
6. Thackeray EW, Halvorsen AJ, Ficalora RD, Engstler GJ, McDonald FS, Oxentenko AS. The effects of gender and age on evaluation of trainees and faculty in gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1610-1614.
7. Rand VE, Hudes ES, BrownerWS, Wachter RM, Avins AL. Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(10): 670-674.
8. Brienza RS, Huot S, Holmboe ES. Influence of gender on the evaluation of internal medicine residents. JWomens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13(1): 77-83.
9. Hlmboe ES, Huot SJ, Brienza RS, Hawkins RE. The association of faculty and residents' gender on faculty evaluations of internal medicine residents in 16 residencies. Acad Med. 2009;84(3):381-384.
10. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system-rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051-1056.
11. Beeson MS, CarterWA, Christopher TA, et al. The development of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(7):724-729.
12. Love JN, Yarris LM, Ankel FK; Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD). Emergency medicine milestones: The next step. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(7):847-848.
13. Ankel F, Franzen D, Frank J. Milestones: Quo vadis?. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(7):749-750.
14. Beeson MS, Holmboe ES, Korte RC, et al. Initial validity analysis of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(7):838-844.
15. Association of American Medical Colleges, Center forWorkforce Studies.Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2014 Physician Specialty Data Book. 2014.
16. Kolehmainen C, Brennan M, Filut A, Isaac C, Carnes M. Afraid of being "witchy with a 'b'": A qualitative study of how gender influences residents' experiences leading cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1276-1281.
17. Burgess DJ, Joseph A, van Ryn M, CarnesM. Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine?. Acad Med. 2012;87(4):506-512.
18. CarnesM, Bartels CM, Kaatz A, Kolehmainen C. Why is John more likely to become department chair than Jennifer?. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:197-214.
19. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109(3):573-598.
20. Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(3):416-427.
21. Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. "A good career choice for women": Female medical students' mentoring experiences: A multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):527-534.
22. Leonard JC, Ellsbury KE. Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residents. Acad Med. 1996;71(5):502-504.
23. Jenkins TM. 'It's time she stopped torturing herself': Structural constraints to decision-making about life-sustaining treatment by medical trainees. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132(132):132-140.
24. IobstWF, Sherbino J, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2010; 32(8):651-656.