Improving flux predictions by integrating data from multiple strains

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 893-900

  Long, Matthew R ^a   Reed, Jennifer L ^a   Wren, Jonathan ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 85018313020     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw706     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Becker, S.A. and Palsson, B.O. (2008) Context-specific metabolic networks are consistent with experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000082.
2. Blazier, A.S. and Papin J.A. (2012) Integration of expression data in genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions. Front. Physiol., 3, 299.
3. Chandrasekaran, S. and Price, N.D. (2010) Probabilistic integrative modeling of genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107, 17845-17850.
4. Chang, R.L. et al. (2010) Drug off-target effects predicted using structural analysis in the context of a metabolic network model. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000938.
5. Colijn, C. et al. (2009) Interpreting expression data with metabolic flux models: predicting Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolic acid production. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000489.
6. Edwards J.S. et al. (2001) In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol., 19, 125-130.
7. Fong, S.S. and Palsson, B. (2004) Metabolic gene-deletion strains of Escherichia coli evolve to computationally predicted growth phenotypes. Nat. Genet., 36, 1056-1058.
8. Ibarra, R.U. et al. (2002) Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature, 420, 186-189.
9. Ishii, N. et al. (2007) Multiple high-throughput analyses monitor the response of E. coli to perturbations. Science, 316, 593-597.
10. Jensen, P.A. and Papin, J.A. (2011) Functional integration of a metabolic network model and expression data without arbitrary thresholding. Bioinformatics, 27, 541-547.
11. Kim, H.U. et al. (2011) Integrative genome-scale metabolic analysis of Vibrio vulnificus for drug targeting and discovery. Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 460.
12. Kim, J. and Reed, J.L. (2012) RELATCH: relative optimality in metabolic networks explains robust metabolic and regulatory responses to perturbations. Genome Biol., 13, R78.
13. Leighty, R.W. and Antoniewicz, M.R. (2013) COMPLETE-MFA: complementary parallel labeling experiments technique for metabolic flux analysis. Metab. Eng., 20, 49-55.
14. Lewis, N.E. et al. (2010) Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol. Syst. Biol., 6, 390.
15. Long, C.P. et al. (2016) Characterization of physiological responses to 22 gene knockouts in Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism. Metab. Eng., 37, 102-113.
16. Machado, D. and Herrgård, M. (2014) Systematic evaluation of methods for integration of transcriptomic data into constraint-based models of metabolism. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003580.
17. Mahadevan, R. and Schilling, C.H. (2003) The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. Metab. Eng., 5, 264-276.
18. Maia, P. et al. (2016) In silico constraint-based strain optimization methods: the quest for optimal cell factories. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 80, 45-67.
19. Montezano, D. et al. (2015) Flux balance analysis with objective function defined by proteomics data - metabolism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposed to mefloquine. PLoS One, 10, e0134014.
20. Orth, J.D. et al. (2011) A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism-2011. Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 535.
21. Papoutsakis, E.T. (1984) Equations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 26, 174-187.
22. Reed, J.L. et al. (2003) An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biol., 4, R54.
23. Schuetz, R. et al. (2007) Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 119.
24. Segrè, D. et al. (2002) Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 15112-15117.
25. Shlomi, T. et al. (2005) Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 7695-7700.
26. Zamboni, N. et al. (2009) (13)C-based metabolic flux analysis. Nat. Protoc., 4, 878-892.
27. Zhang, Z. et al. (2015) CeCaFDB: a curated database for the documentation, visualization and comparative analysis of central carbon metabolic flux distributions explored by 13C-fluxomics. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D549-D557.
28. Zur, H. et al. (2010) iMAT: an integrative metabolic analysis tool. Bioinformatics, 26, 3140-3142.