Criteria-referenced formative assessment in the arts

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 297-314

  Chen, Fei ^a   Lui, Angela M ^b   Andrade, Heidi ^b   Valle, Christopher ^c   Mir, Hirah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arts education; Criteria; Formative assessment; Peer assessment; Rubric; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017131483     PISSN: 18748597     EISSN: 18748600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-017-9259-z     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Andrade, H. G. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 4(4). Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4.
3. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
4. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: the effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3–13.
5. Andrade, H., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–302.
6. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 199–214.
7. Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
9. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Los Angeles: SAGE.
10. Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.
11. Chen, F., & Andrade, H. (2016). The impact of criteria-referenced formative assessment on fifth-grade students’ theater arts achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–10. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1255870.
12. Colwell, R. (2004). Evaluation in the arts is sheer madness. ARTSPRAXIS, 1, 1–12 Retrieved from http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/music/artspraxis.
13. Core Team, R. (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing URL http://www.R-project.org/.
14. Diamond, A., & Sekhon, J. S. (2005). Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: a general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Review of Economics and Statistics. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8gx4v5qt#page-1.
15. Englebright, K., & Mahoney, M. R. (2012). Assessment in elementary dance education. Journal of Dance Education, 12(3), 87–92.
16. Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234–249.
17. Harding, M. (2012). Assessment in the high school technique class: creating thinking dancers. Journal of Dance Education, 12(3), 93–98.
18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
19. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
20. Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014). Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment. Instructional Science, 42(4), 539–559.
21. Mastrorilli, T. M., Harnett, S., & Zhu, J. (2014). Arts Achieve, impacting student success in the arts: preliminary findings after one year of implementation. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 10(1), 1–24.
22. Metis Associates (2015). Arts Achieve 2011–2014 internal consistencies. Unpublished report. New York: Author.
23. National Endowment for the Arts. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: findings from four longitudinal studies (Research Report #55). Washington, DC: J. S. Catterall, S. A., Dumais, & G Hampden-Thompson.
24. Ross, J., & Starling, M. (2008). Self-assessment in a technology-supported environment: the case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(2), 183–199.
25. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
26. Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257–268 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15733050.
27. Topping, K. (2013). Peer assessment as a form of formative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395–412). Los Angeles: SAGE.
28. Valle, C. (2015). Effects of criteria-referenced formative assessment on achievement in music (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3740126).
29. Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. New York: Routledge.
30. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: what will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.