Feedback in group psychotherapy for eating disorders: A randomized clinical trial

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 484-494

  Davidsen, Annika Helgadóttir ^a,b   Poulsen, Stig ^b   Lindschou, Jane ^c   Winkel, Per ^a   Tróndarson, Marjun Fríger ^a   Waaddegaard, Mette ^a   Lau, Marianne ^a  

^a Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c Mental Health Services CPH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

eating disorders; feedback informed psychotherapy; group psychotherapy; systemic and narrative psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMUTILATION; BINGE EATING DISORDER; BULIMIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DSM-IV; EATING DISORDER; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHEEHAN DISABILITY SCALE; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST 90; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEEDING AND EATING DISORDERS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGICAL FEEDBACK; PSYCHOLOGY; SUICIDE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEEDING AND EATING DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOTHERAPY, GROUP; SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR; SUICIDE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85017115269     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: 19392117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000173     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Amble, I., Gude, T., Ulvenes, P., Stubdal, S., & Wampold, B. E. (2016). How and when feedback works in psychotherapy: Is it the signal? Psychotherapy Research, 26, 545-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1053552
2. APA. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Assmann, S. F., Pocock, S. J., Enos, L. E., & Kasten, L. E. (2000). Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet, 355, 1064-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02039-0
4. Bargmann, S., & Robinson, B. (2011). Feedback-informed clinical work: The basics [Manual]. The ICCE Manuals on Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT).
5. Bauer, S., Winn, S., Schmidt, U., & Kordy, H. (2005). Construction, scoring and validation of the Short Evaluation of Eating Disorders (SEED). European Eating Disorders Review, 13, 191-200. http://dx.doi .org/10.1002/erv.637
6. Bech, P. (2004). Measuring the dimensions of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. Quality of life newsletter, 32, 15-16.
7. Bertolino, B., Axsen, R., Maeschalck, C, Mller, S. D., & Babbins-Wagner, R. (2012). Manual 6: Implementing Feedback-informed Work in Agencies and Systems of Care. The ICCE Manuals on Feedback-Informed Treatment.
8. Bertolino, B., Bargmann, S., & Miller, S. D. (2012). What works in therapy: A primer [Manual]. The ICCE Manuals on Feedback-Informed Treatment (FIT).
9. Carpenter, J. R., & Kenward, M. G. (2013). Multiple imputation of quantitative data. In Multiple imputation and its application (pp. 77-88). Chichester, UK: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119942283
10. Cooper, Z., & Fairburn, C. G. (1987). The eating disorder examination: A semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopa-thology of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198701)6:K1::AID-EAT2260060102>3.0.CO;2-9
11. Danish Health Authorities. (2005). Spiseforstyrrelser. Anbefalinger for organisation og behandling [Eating disorders. Recommendations for organization and treatment]. Retrieved from http://www.sst.dk/~/media/ A297287DE0F548A88DC8F8C44441A8A9.ashx
12. Danish Regions. (2014). Pakkeforløb for spiseforstyrrelser [Standardized treatment for eating disorders]. Retrieved from http://regioner.dk/media/ 1252/spiseforstyrrelser.pdf
13. Davidsen, A. H., Poulsen, S., Waaddegaard, M., Lindschou, J., & Lau, M. (2014). Feedback versus no feedback in improving patient outcome in group psychotherapy for eating disorders (F-EAT): Protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials, 15, 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-138
14. Davidsen, A. H. (2013). F-EAT allegiance scale (unpublished).
15. Davidson, K., Perry, A., & Bell, L. (2015). Would continuous feedback of patient's clinical outcomes to practitioners improve NHS psychological therapy services? Critical analysis and assessment of quality of existing studies. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88, 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papt.12032
16. de Jong, K., & de Goede, M. (2015). Why do some therapists not deal with outcome monitoring feedback? A feasibility study on the effect of regulatory focus and person-organization fit on attitude and outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 661-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10503307.2015.1076198
17. de Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464-474. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
18. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale-Preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9, 13-28.
19. Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.128 .3.280
20. Duncan, B. L. (2012). The partners for change outcome management system (PCOMS): The heart and soul of change project. Canadian Psychology, 53, 93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027762
21. Duncan, B., & Miller, S. D. (2000). The client's theory of change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 169-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1009448200244
22. Duncan, B. L., & Reese, R. J. (2015). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) revisiting the client's frame of reference. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, & Practice, 52, 391-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000026
23. Dupont, W. D., & Plummer, W. D., Jr. (1990). Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 116-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-M
24. Dupont, W. D., & Plummer, W. D., Jr. (1998). Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Controlled Clinical Trials, 19, 589-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00037-3
25. Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (1993). The eating disorder examination. In C. G. Fairburn & G. T. Wilson (Eds.), Binge eating: Nature, assessment and treatment (12th ed., pp. 317-360). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26. FIT-Outcomes. (2012). Feedback informed treatment. Retrieved from https://www.fit-outcomes.com
27. Gluud, L. L., Thorlund, K., Gluud, C., Woods, L., Harris, R., & Sterne, J. A. (2008). Correction: Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00023
28. Gotzsche, P. C. (1996). Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts. Controlled Clinical Trials, 17, 285-290.
29. Green, D., & Latchford, G. (2012). Maximising the benefits of psychotherapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ 9781119967590
30. Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11132-000
31. ICCE. (2016). International Center for Clinical Excellence. Retrieved from https://www.centerforclinicalexcellence.com/
32. Järvinen, T. L., Sihvonen, R., Bhandari, M., Sprague, S., Malmivaara, A., Paavola, M., . . . Guyatt, G. H. (2014). Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 769-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .jclinepi.2013.11.011
33. Kahan, B. C., & Morris, T. P. (2012). Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: Review and reanal-ysis. British Medical Journal, 345, e5840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj .e5840
34. Kalodner, C. R., Coughlin, J. W., & Seide, M. (2014). Psychoeducational and counseling groups to prevent and treat eating disorders and disturbances. In J. L. DeLucia-Waack, C. R. Kalodner, & M. T. Riva (Eds.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 484-494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Kazdin, A. E. (1994). Methodology, design and evaluation in psychotherapy research. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 19-71). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
36. Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Makuch, R. W., Brass, L. M., & Horwitz, R. I. (1999). Stratified randomization for clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00138-3
37. Kjaergard, L. L., Villumsen, J., & Gluud, C. (2001). Reported methodo-logic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 982-989. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010
38. Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: Meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 15-22. http://dx .doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967
39. Krägeloh, C. U., Czuba, K. J., Billington, D. R., Kersten, P., & Siegert, R. J. (2015). Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: A scoping study and typology. Psychiatric Services, 66, 224-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400141
40. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.159
41. Lambert, M., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (Vol. 2, pp. 203-223). New York, NY: Oxford University press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.003.0010
42. Lutz, W., De Jong, K., & Rubel, J. (2015). Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go? Psychotherapy Research, 25, 625-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10503307.2015.1079661
43. Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Schiefele, A. K., Zimmermann, D., Böhnke, J. R., & Wittmann, W. W. (2015). Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 647-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553
44. Montoya, I. D., Schroeder, J. R., Preston, K. L., Covi, L., Umbricht, A., Contoreggi, C, . . . Gorelick, D. A. (2005). Influence of psychotherapy attendance on buprenorphine treatment outcome. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28, 247-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.01 .004
45. Moran, P., Leese, M., Lee, T., Walters, P., Thornicroft, G., & Mann, A. (2003). Standardised assessment of personality-abbreviated scale (SAPAS): Preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 228-232. http://dx.doi .org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.228
46. OQ-Measures. (2015). OQ measures. Retrieved from http://www .oqmeasures.com/
47. Page, A. C, & Hooke, G. R. (2009). Best practices: Increased attendance in inpatient group psychotherapy improves patient outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 60, 426-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.426
48. Plambech, B., Lau, M., & Christensen, G. (2000). Stolpegårdmodellen - et behandlingstilbud [The Stolpegaard model-A treatment option]. In J. Andreasen & E. Christiansen (Eds.), Spiseforstyrrelser. En tvcerfaglig antologi [Eating disorders: An interdisciplinary anthology] (pp. 343-365). København, Denmark: Frydenlund.
49. Pocock, S. J. (1983). Methods of randomization. In S. J. Pocock (Ed.), Clinical trials-A practical approach (pp. 66-89). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
50. Probst, T., Lambert, M. J., Loew, T. H., Dahlbender, R. W., Göllner, R., & Tritt, K. (2013). Feedback on patient progress and clinical support tools for therapists: Improved outcome for patients at risk of treatment failure in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75, 255-261. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.003
51. Reardon, M. L., Cukrowicz, K. C, Reeves, M. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2002). Duration and regularity of therapy attendance as predictors of treatment outcome in an adult outpatient population. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 273-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713664390
52. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. New York, NY: Wiley.
53. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2010). Measuring self-harm behavior with the self-harm inventory. Psychiatry, 7, 16-20.
54. Sapyta, J., Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2005). Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 145-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20107
55. Savovic, J., Jones, H. E., Altman, D. G., Harris, R. J., Jüni, P., Pildal, J., . . . Sterne, J. A. C. (2012). Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157, 429-438. http://dx.doi.org/10 .7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537
56. Schmidt, U., Landau, S., Pombo-Carril, M. G., Bara-Carril, N., Reid, Y., Murray, K., . . . Katzman, M. (2006). Does personalized feedback improve the outcome of cognitive-behavioural guided self-care in bulimia nervosa? A preliminary randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 111-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/ 014466505X29143
57. Schuman, D. L., Slone, N. C, Reese, R. J., & Duncan, B. (2015). Efficacy of client feedback in group psychotherapy with soldiers referred for substance abuse treatment. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 396-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.900875
58. Sheehan, D. V., Harnett-Sheehan, K., & Raj, B. A. (1996). The measurement of disability. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 89-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004850-199606003-00015
59. Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., . . . Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuro-psychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22-33.
60. Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Busath, G., Vazquez, A., Berkeljon, A., Hyer, K.,... Berrett, M. (2013). Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: A randomized controlled study. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307 .2013.787497
61. Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Harris, M. W., Busath, G., & Vazquez, A. (2012). Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 638-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012 .698918
62. Slone, N. C, Reese, R. J., Mathews-Duvall, S., & Kodet, J. (2015). Evaluation the efficacy of client feedback in group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice.
63. Smink, F. R., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2013). Epidemiology, course, and outcome of eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26, 543-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328365a24f
64. Swift, J. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2012). Premature discontinuation in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 547-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028226
65. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
66. Tasca, G. A., Illing, V., Joyce, A. S., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2009). Three-level multilevel growth models for nested change data: A guide for group treatment researchers. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 453-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503300902933188
67. Truitt, K. G. (2011). Modeling treatment outcomes in eating disorders (PhD Dissertation), Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
68. Wood, L., Egger, M., Gluud, L. L., Schulz, K. F., Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., ... Sterne, J. A. C. (2008). Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: Meta-epidemiological study. British Medical Journal, 336, 601-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD
69. Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.