Feedback on patient progress and clinical support tools for therapists: Improved outcome for patients at risk of treatment failure in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 255-261

  Probst, Thomas ^a,b   Lambert, Michael J ^c   Loew, Thomas H ^a   Dahlbender, Reiner W ^d   Göllner, Richard ^e   Tritt, Karin ^a  

^a University Clinic of Regensburg   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Inpatient treatment; Outcome; Psychosomatics; Psychotherapy; Routine clinical care; Treatment failure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

INPATIENT TREATMENT; OUTCOME; PSYCHOSOMATICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; ROUTINE CLINICAL CARE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84882724609     PISSN: 00223999     EISSN: 18791360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Zaudig M Fifty years of psychosomatic inpatient treatment. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2004, 50:355-375.
2. Steffanowski A, Löschmann C, Schmidt J, Wittmann WW, Nübling R Metaanalyse der Effekte psychosomatischer Rehabilitation 2007, Huber, Bern.
3. Tritt K, von Heymann F, Loew TH, Benker B, Bleichner F, Buchmüller R, et al. Patients of a psychotherapeutic inpatient setting: patient description and effectiveness of treatment. Psychother Psychol Psychother Med Klin Psychol 2003, 8:244-251.
4. Probst T, von Heymann F, Zaudig M, Konermann J, Lahmann C, Loew T, et al. The effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatment - results of a multicenter follow-up study. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2009, 55:409-420.
5. Dilcher K, Mestel R, Klingelhöfer J, Köbel W, Sprenger B, Stauss K Psychosomatische Kliniken. Die Protos-Studie 2000, 173-202. Steinkopff, Darmstadt. N. Gerdes, H. Weidemann, W.H. Jäckel (Eds.).
6. Franz M, Janssen P, Lensche H, Schmidtke V, Tetzlaff M, Martin K, et al. On the effect of psychoanalytic oriented psychotherapy - an inpatient multicenter study. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2000, 46:242-258.
7. Bergin AE The effects of psychotherapy: negative results revisited. J Couns Psychol 1963, 10:244-250.
8. Mohr DC Negative outcome in psychotherapy: a critical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 1995, 2:1-27.
9. Lilienfeld SO Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspect Psychol Sci 2007, 2:53-70.
10. Tritt K, Bidmon RK, von Heymann F, Joraschky P, Lahmann C, Nickel MK, et al. An approach to psychotherapeutic health service research: ten theses. Psychother Psychol Psychother Med Klin Psychol 2007, 12:47-59.
11. Finch AE, Lambert MJ, Schaalje BG Psychotherapy quality control: the statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clin Psychol Psychother 2001, 8:231-242.
12. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Bishop MJ, Vermeersch DA, Gray GV, Finch AE Comparison of empirically derived and rationally derived methods for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Clin Psychol Psychother 2002, 9:149-164.
13. Spielmans GI, Masters KS, Lambert MJ A comparison of rational versus empirical methods in prediction of negative psychotherapy outcome. Clin Psychol Psychother 2006, 13:202-214.
14. Lambert MJ, Kahler M, Harmon C, Shimokowa K, Burlingame G Administration and Scoring Manual for the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 2011, American Professional Credentialing Services, Orem, UT.
15. Hannan C, Lambert MJ, Harmon C, Nielsen SL, Smart DW, Shimokawa K, et al. A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. J Clin Psychol 2005, 61:155-163.
16. Lambert MJ Helping clinicians to use and learn from research-based systems: the OQ-analyst. Psychotherapy 2012, 49:109-114.
17. National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) SAMHSA's National Review of Evidence-Based Practices - OQ-analyst. OQ®-Analyst 2009, OQ Measures, Salt Lake City, UT, [www.oqmeasures.com].
18. Howard KI, Moras K, Brill PL, Martinovich Z, Lutz W Evaluation of psychotherapy: efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. Am Psychol 1996, 51:1059-1064.
19. Shimokawa K, Lambert MJ, Smart DW Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010, 78:298-311.
20. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Smart DW, Vermeersch DA, Nielsen SL, Hawkins EJ The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: are outcomes enhanced?. Psychother Res 2001, 11:49-68.
21. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Vermeersch DA, Smart DW, Hawkins EJ, Nielsen SL, et al. Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: a replication. Clin Psychol Psychother 2002, 9:91-103.
22. Hawkins EJ, Lambert MJ, Vermeersch DA, Slade KL, Tuttle KC The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychother Res 2004, 14:308-327.
23. Newnham EA, Hooke GR, Page AC Progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care reduces depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 2010, 127:139-146.
24. Whipple JL, Lambert MJ, Vermeersch DA, Smart DW, Nielsen SL, Hawkins EJ Improving the effects of psychotherapy: the use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. J Couns Psychol 2003, 50:59-68.
25. Lambert MJ, Bailey R, Kimball K, Shimokawa K, Harmon SC, Slade K Clinical support tools manual-brief version-40 2007, OQ Measures, Salt Lake City.
26. Harmon S, Lambert MJ, Smart DM, Hawkins E, Nielsen SL, Slade K, et al. Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychother Res 2007, 17:379-392.
27. Slade K, Lambert MJ, Harmon S, Smart DW, Bailey R Improving psychotherapy outcome: the use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools. Clin Psychol Psychother 2008, 15:287-303.
28. Simon W, Lambert MJ, Harris MW, Busath G, Vazquez A Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychother Res 2012, 22:638-647.
29. Crits-Christoph P, Ring-Kurtz S, Hamilton JL, Lambert MJ, Gallop R, McClure B, et al. A preliminary study of the effects of individual patient-level feedback in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. J Subst Abuse Treat 2012, 42:301-309.
30. Simon W, Lambert MJ, Busath G, Vazquez A, Berkeljon A, Hyer K, et al. Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: a randomized controlled study. Psychother Res 2013, 23:287-300.
31. Lambert MJ, Hannöver W, Nisslmüller K, Richard M, Kordy H Questionnaire on the results of psychotherapy: reliability and validity of the German translation of the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2). Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2002, 31:40-47.
32. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures. Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005, 8:94-104.
33. Singer JD, Willett JB Applied longitudinal data analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurence 2003, Oxford University Press, London.
34. Göllner R, Gollwitzer M, Heider J, Zaby A, Schröder A Analysis of longitudinal data with hierarchical linear models. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2010, 39:179-188.
35. Durlak JA How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol 2009, 34:917-928.
36. Jacobson NS, Truax P Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991, 59:12-19.
37. World Health Organization WHO ICD-10: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders 1992, WHO, Geneva.
38. Sechrest L, Phillips MA, Redner R, Yeaton WH Some neglected problems in evaluation research: strength and integrity of treatments. Evaluation studies review annual 1979, vol. 4:15-35. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. L. Sechrest, S.G. West, M. Phillips, R. Redner, W.H. Yeaton (Eds.).
39. Huber D, Albrecht C, Hautum A, Henrich G, Klug G Effectiveness of inpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy: a follow-up study. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2009, 55:189-199.
40. Knappe S, Runge J, Beesdo K, Jacobi F, Wittchen H-U Diagnosing mental disorders: gold or tin standard? Critical comments on standardized diagnostic interviews and clinical routine diagnoses. PPmP 2008, 58:72-75.
41. American Psychological Association (APA) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am Psychol 2002, 57:1060-1073.