Infrastructure and institutions: Stakeholder perspectives of stormwater governance in Chicago

Cities

Volumn 66, Issue , 2017, Pages 44-52

  Cousins, Joshua J ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Environmental governance; Green infrastructure; Stormwater

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GREENSPACE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; STAKEHOLDER; STORMWATER;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85016953023     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barry, J., Proops, J., Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics 28:3 (1999), 337–345.
2. Brannstrom, C., A Q-method analysis of environmental governance discourses in Brazil's northeastern soy frontier. The Professional Geographer 63:4 (2011), 531–549.
3. Brannstrom, C., Jepson, W., Persons, N., Social perspectives on wind-power development in West Texas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101:4 (2011), 839–851.
4. Brown, R.R., Local institutional development and organizational change for advancing sustainable urban water futures. Environmental Management 41:2 (2008), 221–233, 10.1007/s00267-007-9046-6.
5. Bulkeley, H., Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35:1 (2010), 229–253.
6. Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38:3 (2012), 1–15, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
7. Byrne, J.A., Lo, A.Y., Jianjun, Y., Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 138 (2015), 132–143, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.013.
8. Campbell, C.W., Dymond, R.L., Dritschel, A., Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey. 2016, 2016, 1–50 Retrieved from http://www.wku.edu/engineering/civil/fpm/swusurvey/western_kentucky_university_sw%5Cnu_survey_2014.pdf.
9. Castán Broto, V., Bulkeley, H., A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 23:1 (2013), 92–102, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005.
10. Changnon, S.A., Stormwater management for a record rainstorm at Chicago. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 146:1 (2010), 103–109.
11. Changnon, S.A., Westcott, N.E., Heavy rainstorms in Chicago: Increasing frequency, altered impacts, and future implications. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:5 (2002), 1467–1475, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04359.x.
12. Cousins, J.J., Volume control: Stormwater and the politics of urban metabolism. Geoforum, 2016, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.020.
13. Cousins, J.J., Structuring hydro-social relations in urban water governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2017, 10.1080/24694452.2017.1293501.
14. Danielson, S., Webler, T., Tuler, S.P., Using Q method for the formative evaluation of public participation processes. Society & Natural Resources 23:1 (2009), 92–96, 10.1080/08941920802438626.
15. Dobbie, M., Green, R., Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 110 (2013), 143–154, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.003.
16. Dorfman, M., Mehta, M., Chicago, Illinois. Thirsty for answers: Preparing for the water-related impacts of climate change in American cities, 2011, Natural Resources Defense Council.
17. Dryzek, J.S., The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
18. Eden, S., Donaldson, A., Walker, G., Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography. Area 37:4 (2005), 413–422, 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00641.x.
19. Emanuel, R., City of Chicago green stormwater infrastructure strategy. 2014 (Chicago).
20. EPA, Stormwater phase II final rule: Small MS4 stormwater program overview. 1–3, 2005 Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/fact1-0.pdf.
21. Ernstson, H., Leeuw, S.E., Redman, C.L., Meffert, D.J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., Elmqvist, T., Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39:8 (2010), 531–545, 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9.
22. Farrelly, M., Brown, R., Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward?. Global Environmental Change 21:2 (2011), 721–732, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007.
23. Finewood, M.H., Green infrastructure, grey epistemologies, and the urban political ecology of Pittsburgh's water governance. Antipode 48:4 (2016), 1000–1021, 10.1111/anti.12238.
24. Fisher, J., Brown, K., Wind energy on the Isle of Lewis: Implications for deliberative planning. Environment and Planning A 41:10 (2009), 2516–2536, 10.1068/a41129.
25. Fitzgerald, J., Laufer, J., Governing green stormwater infrastructure: The Philadelphia experience. Local Environment, 2016, 1–13, 10.1080/13549839.2016.1191063.
26. Forrester, J., Cook, B., Bracken, L., Cinderby, S., Donaldson, A., Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems. Applied Geography 56 (2015), 199–208, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.019.
27. Freitag, A., Naming, framing, and blaming: Exploring ways of knowing in the deceptively simple question “what is water quality?”. Human Ecology 42:2 (2014), 325–337, 10.1007/s10745-014-9649-5.
28. Gartland, L., Heat islands: Understanding and mitigating heat in urban areas. 2008, Earthscan, New York, NY.
29. Glaser, B., Strauss, A., The discovery of grounded theory. 1967, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
30. Guttman, L., Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 19:2 (1954), 149–161.
31. Hayhoe, K., Wuebbles, D., Hellman, J., Lesht, B., Nadelhoffer, K., Chicago climate action plan: Climate change and Chicago: Projections and potential impacts. Chicago Climate Action Plan, 2007.
32. IPCC, Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Pachauri, R., Meyer, L.A., (eds.) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2014 (Geneva, Switzerland).
33. Kaiser, H., The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1960), 141–151.
34. Kaplowitz, M.D., Lupi, F., Stakeholder preferences for best management practices for non-point source pollution and stormwater control. Landscape and Urban Planning 104:3–4 (2012), 364–372, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.013.
35. Kirchhoff, C.J., Lemos, M.C., Engle, N.L., What influences climate information use in water management? The role of boundary organizations and governance regimes in Brazil and the U.S. Environmental Science & Policy 26 (2013), 6–18.
36. Malec, S., Storm water management in the City of Chicago. National conference on urban stormwater: Enhancing programs at the local level, 2003, 215–220.
37. Matthews, T., Lo, A.Y., Byrne, J.A., Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning 138 (2015), 155–163, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010.
38. Newell, J.P., Cousins, J.J., The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political-industrial ecology. Progress in Human Geography 39:6 (2015), 702–728, 10.1177/0309132514558442.
39. NRDC, Re-envisioning the Chicago river: Adopting comprehensive regional solutions to the invasive species crisis. Retrieved from www.nrdc.org/water/, 2010.
40. Ntelekos, A.A., Oppenheimer, M., Smith, J.A., Miller, A.J., Urbanization, climate change and flood policy in the United States. Climatic Change 103:3–4 (2010), 597–616, 10.1007/s10584-009-9789-6.
41. O'Neill, S.J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S., Day, S.A., On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change 23:2 (2013), 413–421, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006.
42. Pallett, H., Chilvers, J., Organizations in the making: Learning and intervening at the science-policy interface. Progress in Human Geography 39:2 (2014), 146–166, 10.1177/0309132513518831.
43. Powers, T.H., Emanuel, R., City of Chicago stormwater management ordinance manual. 2014 (March).
44. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M., Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:2 (1973), 155–169.
45. Robbins, P., The politics of barstool biology: Environmental knowledge and power in greater Northern Yellowstone. Geoforum 37 (2006), 185–199.
46. Robbins, P., Krueger, R., Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. The Professional Geographer 52:4 (2000), 636–648.
47. Robertson, M.M., The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35:3 (2004), 361–373, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002.
48. Schäffler, A., Swilling, M., Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure — The Johannesburg case. Ecological Economics 86 (2013), 246–257, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.008.
49. Setiawan, A.D., Cuppen, E., Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 1188–1199, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.057.
50. Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R., Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19:3 (1989), 387–420.
51. Swedeen, P., Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA. Ecological Economics 57:2 (2006), 190–208, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.003.
52. Ward, L., Eco-governmentality revisited: Mapping divergent subjectivities among Integrated Water Resource Management experts in Paraguay. Geoforum 46 (2013), 91–102, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.004.
53. Watts, S., Stenner, P., Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method, and interpretation. 2012, SAGE Publications, London.
54. Webler, T., Danielson, S., Tuler, S., Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. 2009, Social and Environmental Research Institute, Greenfield MA.
55. White, S.S., Boswell, M.R., Stormwater quality and local government innovation. Journal of the American Planning Association 73:2 (2007), 185–193, 10.1080/01944360708976152.