Stakeholder preferences for best management practices for non-point source pollution and stormwater control

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 104, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 364-372

  Kaplowitz, Michael D ^a   Lupi, Frank ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Michigan; Trade offs; Watershed

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; POLLUTION CONTROL; PUBLIC POLICY; SOIL CONSERVATION; STORM SEWERS; STORMS; SURVEYS; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATERSHEDS;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; MICHIGAN; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; TRADE OFF;

DECISION MAKING;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; STAKEHOLDER; STORMWATER; TRADE-OFF; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855549119     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. AAPOR Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys 2008, The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), Lenexa, Kansas.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) National Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) 2000, Database (CD-ROM).
3. Arabi M., Govindaraju R.S., Hantush M.M. Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resources Research 2006, 42:W10429.
4. Asakawa S., Yoshida K., Yabe K. Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporro, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68:167-182. 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00158-0.
5. Barrett M.E. Performance comparision of structural stormwater best managment practices. Water Environment Research 2005, 77(1):78-86.
6. Blomquist G.C., Newsome M.A., Stone D.B. Public marginal willingness to trade off among water quality programs: Estimates of statewide and watershed-specific budget values. Water Resources Research 2000, 36(5):1301-1313.
7. Center for Watershed Protection [CWP] National pollutant removal performance database for stormwater treatment practices 2000, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD.
8. Collins A., Rosenberger R., Fletcher J. The economic value of stream restoration. Water Resources Research 2005, 41:W02017.
9. Dearden P. Public participation and scenic quality analysis. Landscape Planning 1981, 8(1):3-19.
10. Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 523.
11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000). Storm water phase II final rule: An overview, EPA 833-F-00-001.
12. Farber S., Griner B. Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis. Ecological Economics 2000, 34(1):63-76.
13. Freeman A.M. The measurement of environmental and resource values 1993, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, p. 516.
14. Gitau M.W., Veith T.L., Gburek W.J., Jarrett A.R. Watershed level best management practice selection and placement in the Town Brook Watershed, New York. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2006, 42(6):1565-1584.
15. Giupponi C., Sgobbi A. Models and decisions support systems for participatory decision making in integrated water resource management. Coping with water deficiency 2008, Springer, Netherlands. P. Koundouri (Ed.).
16. Gregory R. Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions. Environment 2000, 42(5):34-44.
17. Gregory R., Wellman K. Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: A community-based estuary case study. Ecological Economics 2001, 39(1):37-52.
18. Hare M.P., Barreteau O., Beck M.B., Letcher R.A., Mostert E., Tabara J.D., et al. Methods for stakeholder participation in water management. Sustainable management of water resources: An integrated approach 2006, 361. Edward Elgar Publishing. C. Giupponi, A.J. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, M.P. Hare (Eds.).
19. Hoehn J.P., Krieger D., Kaplowitz M.D. Estimating benefits of water and wastewater investments: Residential demand in Cairo. International Review of Comparative Public Policy 1999, 11:156-176.
20. Hoehn J.P., Randall A. Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. American Economic Review 1989, 79:544-551.
21. Hoehn J., Lupi F., Kaplowitz M. Untying a Lancastrian bundle: ecosystem valuation in wetland mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 68(3):263-272.
22. Hoehn J., Lupi F., Kaplowitz M. Complexity in stated choice experiments: The effect of information formats on estimated variances and choice parameters. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 2010, 35(3):568-590.
23. Hur J., Schlautman M.A., Templeton S.R., Karanfil T., Post C.J., Smink J.A., et al. Does current management of storm water runoff adequately protect water resources in developing catchments?. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2008, 63(2):77-91.
24. Jenkins E. Sycamore Creek Hydrological Unit Area (HUA) project: Project summary 1999, Michigan State University Extension, East Lansing.
25. Johnston R.J., Swallow S.K., Allen C.W., Smith L.A. Designing multidimensional environmental programs: Assessing tradeoffs and substitution in watershed management plans. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(7). 10.1029/2001WR000521.
26. Junker B., Buchecker M. Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:141-154. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.002.
27. Junker B., Buchecker M., Müller-Böker U. Objectives of public participation: Which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations?. Water Resources Research 2007, 43(W10438). 10.1029/2006WR005584.
28. Kaplowitz M.D., Lupi F. Color Photographs and Mail Survey Response Rates. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2004, 16(2):199-206.
29. Kenwick R.A., Shammin M.R., Sullivan W.C. Preferences for riparian buffers. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 91(2):88-96.
30. Knowler D., Bradshaw B. Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 2007, 32:25-48.
31. Lancaster K. Consumer demand: A new approach 1971, Columbia University Press, New York.
32. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications 2001, Cambridge University Press, p. 402.
33. Low S., Randhir T. Watershed management, structural characteristics, information processing, and cooperative strategies in conservation organizations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2005, 60(6):281.
34. Lupi F., Kaplowitz M., Hoehn J. The economic equivalency of drained and restored wetlands in Michigan. American J. of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84:1355-1361.
35. McDaniels T., Axelrod L.J., Cavanagh N. Public perceptions regarding water quality and attitudes toward water conservation in the lower Fraser Basin. Water Resources Research 1998, 34(5):1299-1306.
36. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of econometrics 1973, Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremba (Ed.).
37. Morris J., Colombo S., Angus A., Stacey K., Parsons D., Brawn M., et al. The value of public rights of way: A choice experiment in Bedfordshire, England. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 93:83-91. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.007.
38. National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Sycamore Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan 1990, Michigan State University Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, Mason.
39. Nielsen A.B., Olsen S.B., Lundhede T. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 80:63-71. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.003.
40. Pennington S.R., Kaplowitz M.D., Witter S.G. Re-examining structural management practices for improving water quality in urban watersheds. Journal of American Water Resources Association 2003, 39(5):1027-1041.
41. Prato T. Risk-based multiattribute decision-making in property and watershed management. Natural Resource Modeling 1999, 12(3):307-334.
42. Prokopy L.S., Floress K., Klotthor-Weinkauf D., Baumgart-Getz A. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2008, 63(5):300-311.
43. Qiu Z., Prato T. Economic evaluation of riparian buffers in an agricultural watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1998, 34(4):877-890.
44. Qiu Z., Prato T., Boehrn G. Economic valuation of riparian buffer and open space in a suburban watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2006, 42(6):1583-1596.
45. Rambonilaza M., Dachary-Bernard J. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment methods?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:318-326. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.013.
46. Roesner L.A., Bledsoe B.P., Brashear R.W. Are best management practices criteria really environmentally friendly?. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2001, May/June, 150-154.
47. Rosenberg S., Margerum R.D. Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: Lessons from five watersheds. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2008, 51(4):477-496.
48. Ryan R.L. Local perceptions and values for a midwestern river corridor. Landscape and Urban Planning 1998, 42:225-237.
49. Schaich H. Local residents' perceptions of floodplain restoration measures in Luxembourg's Syr Valley. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 93:20-30. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.020.
50. Simonovic S.P., Fahmy H. A new modeling approach for water resource policy analysis. Water Resources Research 1999, 35(1):295-304.
51. Srivastava P. Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a generic algorithm. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(3):1-14.
52. Sullivan W.C. Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: Citizen prefences for natural and developed settings. Landscape and Urban Planning 1994, 29:85-101.
53. Sullivan W.C., Anderson O.M., Lovell S.T. Agricultural, buffers at the rural-urban fringe: An examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69(23):299-313.
54. Taylor A., Curnow R., Fletcher T., Lewis J. Education campaigns to reduce stormwater pollution in commercial areas: Do they work?. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 84(3):323-335.
55. Urbonas B. Protecting our receiving waters with BMPs. Water Resources Impact 2001, 3(6):3-6.
56. Väntänen A., Marttunen M. Public involvement in multi-objective water level regulation development projects - Evaluating the applicability of public involvement methods. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2005, 25(3):281-304.
57. Watson J., Hassinger E., Reffruschinni K., Sheedy M., Anthony B. Best management practices meeting water quality goals. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1994, 49(2):39.
58. Webler T., Tuler S. Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies. Policy Studies Journal 2006, 34(4):699-722.
59. William D.L. Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review 2006, 66(s1):100-110.
60. Wu J., Yu S.L., Zou R. A water quality-based approach for watershed wide BMP strategies. Journal of American Water Resources Association 2006, 42(5):1193-1204.
61. Zhai G., Fukuzono T., Ikeda S. Multi-attribute evaluation of flood management in Japan: A choice experiment approach. Water and Environment Journal 2007, 21(4):265-274.