Stormwater quality and local government innovation

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 185-193

  White, Stacey Swearingen ^a   Boswell, Michael R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; STORMWATER; WATER PLANNING; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

KANSAS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249783159     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708976152     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169-200). Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Borins, S. (2002). The challenge of innovating in government. In M. A. Abramson & I. D. Littman (Eds.), Innovation (pp. 59-105). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
3. Davies, T. R. (2003). The missing link. Governing, 16(11), 48.
4. Frederickson, H. G., & Nalbandian, J. (2002). Introduction. In H. G. Frederickson & J. Nalbandian (Eds.), The future of local government administration: The Hansell symposium (pp. vii-ix). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
5. Godwin, M. L., & Schroedel, J. R. (2000). Policy diffusion and strategies for promoting policy change: Evidence from California local gun control ordinances. Policy Studies Journal, 28(4), 760-776.
6. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174-1185.
7. Harris, M., & Kinney, R. (2003). Conclusion. In M. Harris & R. McKinney (Eds.), Innovation and entrepreneurship in state and local governments (pp. 179-192). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
8. Hays, S. P. (1996). Influences on reinvention during the diffusion of innovations. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 631-650.
9. Ihrke, D. M., & Proctor, R. (2003). The influence of administrative leadership and governing board behavior on local government innovation. In M. Harris & R. McKinney (Eds.), Innovation and entrepreneurship in state and local governments (pp. 161-178). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
10. McLemore, R. W., & Rose, T. D. III. (1997). Managing stormwater in a coastal community. In D. J. Watson (Ed.), Innovative governments: Creative approaches to local problems (pp. 9-32). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
11. Merrill, L. (2005). Finding the money for stormwater management. Stormwater, 6(6), 26-34.
12. Newland, C. (2002). Building the futures of local government politics and administration. In H. G. Frederickson & J. Nalbandian (Eds.), The future of local government administration: The Hansell symposium (pp. 231-245). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
13. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
16. Sapat, A. (2004). Devolution and innovation: The adoption of state environmental policy innovations by administrative agencies. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 141-151.
17. Strecker, E. W., Quigley, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., & Clary, J. K. (2001). Determining urban stormwater BMP effectiveness. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 144-149.
18. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005) American Fact Finder. Retrieved on October 22, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/ main.html?_lang=en.
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). Preliminary data summary of urban storm water best management practices (EPA-821-R-99-012). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). National water quality inventory: 2000 report (EPA-841-R-02-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Water quality conditions in the United States: A profile from the 2000 national water quality inventory (EPA-841-F-02-003). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005). National menu of best management practices for stormwater Phase II. Retrieved March 15, 2007 from http://web.archive.org/web/20051211002318/http:// cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/menu.cfm
23. Walker, J. I. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880-899.
24. Walters, J. (2006). Rivals with a cause. Governing, 19(9), 76-78.
25. Watson, D. J. (1997). Climate for innovation. In D. J. Watson (Ed.), Innovative governments: Creative approaches to local problems (pp. 1-8). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26. Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 297-326.
27. White, S. S., & Boswell, M. R. (2006). Planning for water quality: Implementation of the NPDES Phase II Stormwater Program in California and Kansas. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(1), 141-160.
28. Woolson, E. (2005). The price of a utility. Stormwater, 6(5), 10-16.