메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

Non-inferiority trials: are they inferior? A systematic review of reporting in major medical journals

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION CENTER; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MALE; MEDLINE; NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TYPE I ERROR; UNITED STATES; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICS;

EID: 85016742312     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2016-012594     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (119)

References (47)
  • 1
    • 33644792767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006;295:1152-60.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 1152-1160
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 3
    • 79955510087 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority
    • Schumi J, Wittes JT. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials 2011;12:106.
    • (2011) Trials , vol.12 , pp. 106
    • Schumi, J.1    Wittes, J.T.2
  • 4
    • 84866934034 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing equivalence and noninferiority
    • Treadwell JR, Uhl S, Tipton K, et al. Assessing equivalence and noninferiority. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1144-9.
    • (2012) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.65 , pp. 1144-1149
    • Treadwell, J.R.1    Uhl, S.2    Tipton, K.3
  • 6
    • 84866234985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Increasing proportion of clinical trials using noninferiority end points
    • Murthy VL, Desai NR, Vora A, et al. Increasing proportion of clinical trials using noninferiority end points. Clin Cardiol 2012;35:522-3.
    • (2012) Clin Cardiol , vol.35 , pp. 522-523
    • Murthy, V.L.1    Desai, N.R.2    Vora, A.3
  • 7
    • 80052225207 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication of noninferiority clinical trials: changes over a 20-year interval
    • Suda KJ, Hurley AM, McKibbin T, et al. Publication of noninferiority clinical trials: changes over a 20-year interval. Pharmacotherapy 2011;31:833-9.
    • (2011) Pharmacotherapy , vol.31 , pp. 833-839
    • Suda, K.J.1    Hurley, A.M.2    McKibbin, T.3
  • 8
    • 80052226713 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gain in popularity of noninferiority trial design: caveat lector
    • Vermeulen L. Gain in popularity of noninferiority trial design: caveat lector. Pharmacotherapy 2011;31:2.
    • (2011) Pharmacotherapy , vol.31 , pp. 2
    • Vermeulen, L.1
  • 9
    • 84871484789 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594-604.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , pp. 2594-2604
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Pocock, S.J.3
  • 10
    • 0003828057 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • London, UK, cited 3 November 2015
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) CPMP. Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. London, UK, 2000 (cited 3 November 2015). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003658.pdf
    • (2000) Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority
  • 11
    • 33646759912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, Efficacy Working Party, Committee for Release for Consultation. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin. Stat Med 2006;25:1628-38.
    • (2006) Stat Med , vol.25 , pp. 1628-1638
  • 12
    • 0032537894 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials; availability-FDA. Notice
    • International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials; availability-FDA. Notice. Fed Regist 1998;63:49583-98.
    • (1998) Fed Regist , vol.63 , pp. 49583-49598
  • 13
    • 0035858936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International Conference on Harmonisation; choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials; availability. Notice
    • Food, Drug Administration HHS
    • Food, Drug Administration HHS. International Conference on Harmonisation; choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials; availability. Notice. Fed Regist 2001;66:24390-1.
    • (2001) Fed Regist , vol.66 , pp. 24390-24391
  • 14
    • 84872080748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
    • Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586.
    • (2013) BMJ , vol.346
    • Chan, A.W.1    Tetzlaff, J.M.2    Gøtzsche, P.C.3
  • 16
    • 77950273246 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. c869
    • Moher, D.1    Hopewell, S.2    Schulz, K.F.3
  • 17
    • 0037472837 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues-the encounters of academic consultants in statistics
    • D'Agostino RB Sr, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues-the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med 2003;22:169-86.
    • (2003) Stat Med , vol.22 , pp. 169-186
    • D'Agostino, R.B.1    Massaro, J.M.2    Sullivan, L.M.3
  • 18
    • 77956305085 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of the results of intent-to-treat, per-protocol, and g-estimation in the presence of non-random treatment changes in a time-to-event non-inferiority trial
    • Matsuyama Y. A comparison of the results of intent-to-treat, per-protocol, and g-estimation in the presence of non-random treatment changes in a time-to-event non-inferiority trial. Stat Med 2010;29:2107-16.
    • (2010) Stat Med , vol.29 , pp. 2107-2116
    • Matsuyama, Y.1
  • 19
    • 0033566769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. Stat Med 1999;18:1905-42.
    • (1999) Stat Med , vol.18 , pp. 1905-1942
  • 20
    • 77956068940 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
    • Abraha I, Montedori A. Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ 2010;340: c2697.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. c2697
    • Abraha, I.1    Montedori, A.2
  • 21
    • 85108522901 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • cited 31 May
    • ISI Web of Knowledge (cited 31 May 2015). http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR
    • (2015) ISI Web of Knowledge
  • 23
    • 0032694404 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design issues in noninferiority equivalence trials
    • Hwang IK, Morikawa T. Design issues in noninferiority equivalence trials. Drug Inform J 1999;33:1205-18.
    • (1999) Drug Inform J , vol.33 , pp. 1205-1218
    • Hwang, I.K.1    Morikawa, T.2
  • 24
    • 0032054651 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials
    • Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, et al. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials 1998;19:159-66.
    • (1998) Control Clin Trials , vol.19 , pp. 159-166
    • Vickers, A.1    Goyal, N.2    Harland, R.3
  • 25
    • 69349099139 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results
    • Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, et al. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):MR000006.
    • (2009) Cochrane Database Syst Rev , vol.1 , pp. MR000006
    • Hopewell, S.1    Loudon, K.2    Clarke, M.J.3
  • 27
    • 84869001712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials-update and extension
    • Schiller P, Burchardi N, Niestroj M, et al. Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials-update and extension. Trials 2012;13:214.
    • (2012) Trials , vol.13 , pp. 214
    • Schiller, P.1    Burchardi, N.2    Niestroj, M.3
  • 28
    • 78149435107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Room for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic review
    • Wangge G, Klungel OH, Roes KC, et al. Room for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e13550.
    • (2010) PLoS ONE , vol.5
    • Wangge, G.1    Klungel, O.H.2    Roes, K.C.3
  • 29
    • 33644789375 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials
    • Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, et al. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA 2006;295:1147-51.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 1147-1151
    • Le Henanff, A.1    Giraudeau, B.2    Baron, G.3
  • 30
    • 84866531851 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Perioperative dexamethasone administration and risk of bleeding following tonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial
    • Gallagher TQ, Hill C, Ojha S, et al. Perioperative dexamethasone administration and risk of bleeding following tonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;308:1221-6.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , pp. 1221-1226
    • Gallagher, T.Q.1    Hill, C.2    Ojha, S.3
  • 31
    • 84928492025 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma
    • Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N, et al. Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1598-607.
    • (2015) N Engl J Med , vol.372 , pp. 1598-1607
    • Radford, J.1    Illidge, T.2    Counsell, N.3
  • 32
    • 0034303001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique
    • Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008-15.
    • (2000) J Adv Nurs , vol.32 , pp. 1008-1015
    • Hasson, F.1    Keeney, S.2    McKenna, H.3
  • 33
    • 84891737599 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • cited 2016 July 20th
    • COMET Initiative [cited 2016 July 20th]. http://www.comet-initiative.org/
    • COMET Initiative
  • 34
    • 46049100805 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials
    • Lesaffre E. Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2008;66:150-4.
    • (2008) Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis , vol.66 , pp. 150-154
    • Lesaffre, E.1
  • 35
    • 84926321601 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia in adults
    • Postma DF, van Werkhoven CH, van Elden LJ, et al. Antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1312-23.
    • (2015) N Engl J Med , vol.372 , pp. 1312-1323
    • Postma, D.F.1    van Werkhoven, C.H.2    van Elden, L.J.3
  • 36
    • 84911413437 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial
    • Schulz-Schüpke S, Helde S, Gewalt S, et al. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;312:1981-7.
    • (2014) JAMA , vol.312 , pp. 1981-1987
    • Schulz-Schüpke, S.1    Helde, S.2    Gewalt, S.3
  • 37
    • 84870561859 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of 2- vs 4-week attending physician inpatient rotations on unplanned patient revisits, evaluations by trainees, and attending physician burnout: a randomized trial
    • Lucas BP, Trick WE, Evans AT, et al. Effects of 2- vs 4-week attending physician inpatient rotations on unplanned patient revisits, evaluations by trainees, and attending physician burnout: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012;308:2199-207.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.308 , pp. 2199-2207
    • Lucas, B.P.1    Trick, W.E.2    Evans, A.T.3
  • 38
    • 84860519915 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Active management of the third stage of labour with and without controlled cord traction: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
    • Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Landoulsi S, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour with and without controlled cord traction: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;379:1721-7.
    • (2012) Lancet , vol.379 , pp. 1721-1727
    • Gülmezoglu, A.M.1    Lumbiganon, P.2    Landoulsi, S.3
  • 39
    • 84931095567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Noninferiority trials: is a new treatment almost as effective as another?
    • Kaji AH, Lewis RJ. Noninferiority trials: is a new treatment almost as effective as another? JAMA 2015;313:2371-2.
    • (2015) JAMA , vol.313 , pp. 2371-2372
    • Kaji, A.H.1    Lewis, R.J.2
  • 40
    • 84954543513 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Frozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation and clinical resolution of diarrhea in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial
    • Lee CH, Steiner T, Petrof EO, et al. Frozen vs fresh fecal microbiota transplantation and clinical resolution of diarrhea in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315:142-9.
    • (2016) JAMA , vol.315 , pp. 142-149
    • Lee, C.H.1    Steiner, T.2    Petrof, E.O.3
  • 41
    • 84951990352 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of opioids vs NSAIDs and larger vs smaller chest tube size on pain control and pleurodesis efficacy among patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME1 randomized clinical trial
    • Rahman NM, Pepperell J, Rehal S, et al. Effect of opioids vs NSAIDs and larger vs smaller chest tube size on pain control and pleurodesis efficacy among patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:2641-53.
    • (2015) JAMA , vol.314 , pp. 2641-2653
    • Rahman, N.M.1    Pepperell, J.2    Rehal, S.3
  • 42
    • 84943403874 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALACART randomized clinical trial
    • Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALACART randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1356-63.
    • (2015) JAMA , vol.314 , pp. 1356-1363
    • Stevenson, A.R.1    Solomon, M.J.2    Lumley, J.W.3
  • 43
    • 84943421456 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial
    • Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1346-55.
    • (2015) JAMA , vol.314 , pp. 1346-1355
    • Fleshman, J.1    Branda, M.2    Sargent, D.J.3
  • 44
  • 45
    • 68249114452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls
    • Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009;338:b2393.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.338 , pp. b2393
    • Sterne, J.A.1    White, I.R.2    Carlin, J.B.3
  • 46
    • 84892709710 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing sensitivity analyses for randomised trials: principles
    • Morris TP, Kahan BC, White IR. Choosing sensitivity analyses for randomised trials: principles. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:11.
    • (2014) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.14 , pp. 11
    • Morris, T.P.1    Kahan, B.C.2    White, I.R.3
  • 47
    • 84877633778 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews
    • Vale CL, Tierney JF, Burdett S. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews. BMJ 2013;346:f1798.
    • (2013) BMJ , vol.346 , pp. f1798
    • Vale, C.L.1    Tierney, J.F.2    Burdett, S.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.