Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 314, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 1346-1355

  Fleshman, James ^a   Branda, Megan ^b   Sargent, Daniel J ^b   Boller, Anne Marie ^c   George, Virgilio ^d   Abbas, Maher ^e   Peters, Walter R ^f   Maun, Dipen ^g   Chang, George ^h   Herline, Alan ⁱ   Fichera, Alessandro ^j   Mutch, Matthew ^k   Wexner, Steven ^l   Whiteford, Mark ^m   Marks, John ⁿ   Birnbaum, Elisa ^k   Margolin, David ^o   Larson, David ^b   Marcello, Peter ^p   Posner, Mitchell ^j   Read, Thomas ^p   Monson, John ^q   Wren, Sherry M ^r   Pisters, Peter W T ^h   Nelson, Heidi ^b   more..

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United Arab Emirates)

^f Boone Hospital Center   (United States)

^g Franciscan St Francis Cancer Center   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^k WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l Cleveland Clinic Hospital   (United States)

^m OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ LANKENAU HOSPITAL   (United States)

^o OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

^p LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^r STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUOROURACIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNITED STATES; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84943421456     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Dorrance HR, Docherty GM, O'Dwyer PJ. Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(4):492-498.
2. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, YakimetsWW, Newman SC. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227(2):157-167.
3. Monson JR, WeiserMR, BuieWD, et al; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):535-550.
4. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al; MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators; NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666): 821-828.
5. Parfitt JR, Driman DK. The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(8): 849-855.
6. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):303-312.
7. Arezzo A, Passera R, Salvai A, et al. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):334-348.
8. Sajid MS, Ahamd A, MilesWF, Baig MK. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open totalmesorectal excision.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;6(5): 209-219.
9. Ahmad NZ, Racheva G, Elmusharaf H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(3):269-277.
10. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: ameta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(6):e277-e296.
11. Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C, Cheng Y. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: ameta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2014;188(2): 404-414.
12. Martel G, Crawford A, Barkun JS, et al. Expert opinion on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer parallels evidence from a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35292.
13. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11 (7):637-645.
14. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, CuestaMA, et al; Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210-218.
15. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):75-82.
16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-213.
17. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van derWorp E, et al; Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(7):1729-1734.
18. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050-2059.
19. Kuhry E, SchwenkW, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34(6):498-504.
20. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):767-774.