Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 312, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 1981-1987

  Schulz Schüpke, Stefanie ^a,b   Helde, Sandra ^a   Gewalt, Senta ^a   Ibrahim, Tareq ^c   Linhardt, Maryam ^a   Haas, Katharina ^a   Hoppe, Katharina ^d   Böttiger, Corinna ^d   Groha, Philip ^a   Bradaric, Christian ^c   Schmidt, Roland ^e   Bott Flügel, Lorenz ^f   Ott, Ilka ^a   Goedel, Julia ^a   Byrne, Robert A ^a   Schneider, Simon ^c   Burgdorf, Christof ^a   Morath, Tanja ^a   Kufner, Sebastian ^a   Joner, Michael ^g   Cassese, Salvatore ^a   Hoppmann, Petra ^c   Hengstenberg, Christian ^a,b   Pache, Jürgen ^d   Fusaro, Massimiliano ^a   Massberg, Steffen ^b,h   Mehilli, Julinda ^b,h   Schunkert, Heribert ^a,b   Laugwitz, Karl Ludwig ^b,c   Kastrati, Adnan ^a,b   more..

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b DZHK GERMAN CENTRE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d Abteilung Hämatologie und Onkologie   (Germany)

^e KRANKENHAUS BARMHERZIGE BRÜDER   (Germany)

^f Universittsmedizin Gttingen   (Germany)

^g CVPATH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY PUNCTURE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE FAILURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUAL COMPRESSION; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE; VASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PUNCTURE; TIME;

AGED; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PUNCTURES; TIME FACTORS; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICES;

EID: 84911413437     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15305     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Byrne RA, Cassese S, Linhardt M, Kastrati A. Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(1):27-40.
2. Tavris DR, Gallauresi BA, Lin B, et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use and gender. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16(9):459-464.
3. Dauerman HL, Applegate RJ, Cohen DJ. Vascular closure devices: the second decade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(17):1617-1626.
4. Koreny M, Riedmüller E, Nikfardjam M, Siostrzonek P, Müllner M. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004; 291(3):350-357.
5. Biancari F, D'Andrea V, Di Marco C, Savino G, Tiozzo V, Catania A. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2010;159(4):518-531.
6. Xhepa E, Byrne RA, Schulz S, et al; ISAR-CLOSURE investigators. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site-CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial. Euro Intervention. 2014;10(2): 198-203.
7. Lincoff AM, Kleiman NS, Kereiakes DJ, et al; REPLACE-2 Investigators. Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(6):696-703.
8. Holm NR, Sindberg B, Schou M, et al; CLOSE-UP study group. Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal™ vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: the CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study. Euro Intervention. 2014;10(2):183-190.
9. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1200-1209.
10. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775): 1409-1420.