Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 136, Issue , 2018, Pages 339-346

  Mital, Monika ^a   Chang, Victor ^c   Choudhary, Praveen ^b   Papa, Armando ^d   Pani, Ashis K ^b  

^a GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

^b XLRI XAVIER SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

^c XI AN JIAOTONG LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d LINK CAMPUS UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Healthcare; Indian market; Internet of Things; Multiple theory based approach; Smart cities; Smart supply chain management

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HEALTH CARE; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; SMART CITY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTIONARY STAGE; INDIAN MARKET; MULTIPLE-THEORY BASED APPROACH; STRUCTURED EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR; THEORY OF REASONED ACTION;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

HEALTH CARE; INTERNET; MARKET CONDITIONS; MODEL TEST; SMART CITY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

INDIA;

EID: 85016584017     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A., Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q., 1992, 227–247.
2. Ajzen, I., Driver, B.L., Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. J. Leis. Res., 24(3), 1992, 207.
3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 27(1), 1973, 41.
4. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., Fishbein, M., Muellerleile, P.A., Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull., 127(1), 2001, 142.
5. Amoako-Gyampah, K., Salam, A.F., An extension of the technology acceptance model in an Erp implementation environment. Inf. Manag. 41:6 (2004), 731–745.
6. Barki, H., Hartwick, J., Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Q., 1994, 59–82.
7. Bauer, H.H., Reichardt, T., Barnes, S.J., Neumann, M.M., Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study. J. Electron. Commer. Re., 6(3), 2005, 181.
8. Bendavid, Y., Lefebvre, É., Lefebvre, L.A., Fosso-wamba, S., Key performance indicators for the evaluation of Rfid-enabled B-to-B E-commerce applications: the case of a five-layer supply chain. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 7:1 (2009), 1–20.
9. Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V., Model of adoption of Technology in Households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q., 399-426, 2005.
10. Chan, M., Estève, D., Fourniols, J.-Y., Escriba, C., Campo, E., Smart wearable systems: current status and future challenges. Artif. Intell. Med. 56:3 (2012), 137–156.
11. Chau, P.Y., Hu, P.J.H., Investigating healthcare Professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf. Manag. 39:4 (2002), 297–311.
12. Conner, M., Kirk, S.F., Cade, J.E., Barrett, J.H., Environmental influences: factors influencing a woman's decision to use dietary supplements. J. Nutr. 133:6 (2003), 1978S–1982S.
13. Currall, S.C., Judge, T.A., Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 64:2 (1995), 151–170.
14. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q., 1989, 319–340.
15. Del Giudice, M., Discovering the Internet of Things (Iot) within the business process management: a literature review on technological revitalization. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 22:2 (2016), 263–270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2015-0173.
16. Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M.R., The impact of it-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: a structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 20:3 (2016), 484–498.
17. Eckfeldt, B., What does Rfid do for the consumer?. Commun. ACM 48:9 (2005), 77–79.
18. Ferdous, A.S., Applying the theory of planned behavior to explain marketing managers’ perspectives on sustainable marketing. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 22:4 (2010), 313–325.
19. Gao, L., Bai, X., A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of Internet of Things technology. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 26:2 (2014), 211–231.
20. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27:1 (2003), 51–90.
21. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., Internet of Things (Iot): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29:7 (2013), 1645–1660.
22. Ha, S., Stoel, L., Consumer E-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 62:5 (2009), 565–571.
23. Hair, J.F. Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem). 2013, Sage Publications, New York.
24. Hair, J.F. Jr, Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2016, Sage Publications.
25. Hansen, T., Jensen, J.M., Solgaard, H.S., Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 24:6 (2004), 539–550.
26. Hartwick, J., Barki, H., Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Manag. Sci. 40:4 (1994), 440–465.
27. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Calantone, R.J., Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods 17:2 (2014), 182–209.
28. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods, 3(4), 1998, 424.
29. Hsu, M.-H., Chiu, C.-M., Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decis. Support. Syst. 38:3 (2004), 369–381.
30. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., Leitch, R.A., Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decis. Sci. 28:2 (1997), 357–389.
31. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L., Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q., 183-213, 1999.
32. Koo, C., Chung, N., Kim, H.W., Examining explorative and exploitative uses of smartphones: a user competence perspective examining explorative and exploitative uses of smartphones: a user competence perspective. Inf. Technol. People 28 (2015), 133–162.
33. Li, X., Lu, R., Liang, X., Shen, X., Chen, J., Lin, X., Smart community: an internet of things application. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49:11 (2011), 68–75.
34. Li, S., Tryfonas, T., Li, H., The internet of things: a security point of view. Internet Res. 26:2 (2016), 337–359.
35. Liao, S., Shao, Y.P., Wang, H., Chen, A., The adoption of virtual banking: an empirical study. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 19:1 (1999), 63–74.
36. Liker, J.K., Sindi, A.A., User acceptance of expert systems: a test of the theory of reasoned action. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 14:2 (1997), 147–173.
37. MacCallum, R.C., Austin, J.T., Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:1 (2000), 201–226.
38. Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., Ajzen, I., A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18:1 (1992), 3–9.
39. Mathieson, K., Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2:3 (1991), 173–191.
40. Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I., Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10:7 (2012), 1497–1516.
41. Mykytyn, P.P. Jr., Harrison, D.A., The application of the theory of reasoned action to senior management and strategic information systems. Inf. Resour. Manag. J., 6(2), 1993, 15.
42. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Conceptualizing Smart City with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 2011, 282.
43. Park, Y., Chen, J.V., Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 107:9 (2007), 1349–1365.
44. Pavlou, P.A., Fygenson, M., Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q., 115-143, 2006.
45. Pedersen, P.E., Adoption of mobile internet services: an exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 15:3 (2005), 203–222.
46. Pikkarainen, K., Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model consumer acceptance of online banking : an extension of the technology acceptance model., 14, 2015, 10–11.
47. Pinho, J.C.M.R., Soares, A.M., Examining the technology acceptance model in the adoption of social networks. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 5:2/3 (2011), 116–129.
48. Porter, C.E., Donthu, N., Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J. Bus. Res. 59:9 (2006), 999–1007.
49. Saeed, K.A., Abdinnour, S., Understanding post-adoption is usage stages: an empirical assessment of self-service information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 23:3 (2013), 219–244.
50. Sarac, A., Absi, N., Dauzère-Pérès, S., A literature review on the impact of Rfid technologies on supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 128:1 (2010), 77–95.
51. Shih, Y.Y., Fang, K., The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Res. 14:3 (2004), 213–223.
52. Solima, L., Della Peruta, M.R., Del Giudice, M., Object-generated content and knowledge sharing: the forthcoming impact of the internet of things. J. Knowl. Econ. 7:3 (2016), 738–752.
53. Tan, M., Teo, T.S., Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking. J. AIS, 1(1), 2000, 5.
54. Taylor, S., Todd, P., Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12:2 (1995), 137–155.
55. Taylor, S., Todd, P.A., Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6:2 (1995), 144–176.
56. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., Esposito Vinzi, V., A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting, 1, 2004, 739–742.
57. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H., Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39:2 (2008), 273–315.
58. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Q., 71-102, 2001.
59. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46:2 (2000), 186–204.
60. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q., 425-478, 2003.
61. Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A., A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16:1 (2005), 85–102.
62. Wojick, M., Internet of things - potential for libraries. Library Hi Tech 34:2 (2016), 404–420.
63. Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., Rho, J., Extending the Tam for a T-commerce. Inf. Manag. 42:7 (2005), 965–976.