Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 565-571

  Ha, Sejin ^a   Stoel, Leslie ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparel shopping; E shopping quality; Enjoyment; Technology acceptance model; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849121782     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adamson I., and Shine J. Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A bank's treasury. Technol Anal Strat Manage 15 4 (2003) 441-455
2. Ahn T., Ryu S., and Han I. The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of internet shopping malls. Electron Commer Res Appl 3 4 (2003) 405-420
3. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J., and Beckmann J. (Eds). Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (1985), Springer, Berlin 101-128
4. Ajzen I., and Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (1980), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
5. Armstrong J.S., and Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Market Res 14 3 (1977) 396-402
6. Anderson E.W., and Sullivan M.W. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science 12 2 (1993) 125-143
7. Bauer H.H., Falk T., and Hammerschmidt M. e-TransQual: a transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. J Bus Res 59 7 (2006) 866-875
8. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA 136-162
9. Bruner II G.C., and Kumar A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. J Bus Res 58 5 (2005) 553-558
10. Caruana A., and Ewing M.T. The psychometric properties of eTail quality: An international investigation across product categories. Int Market Rev 23 4 (2006) 353-370
11. Chau P.Y.K., and Hu P.J.-W. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Dec Sci 32 4 (2001) 699-719
12. Chau P.Y.K., and Lai V.S. An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking. J Organ Comp Electron Commer, 13 2 (2003) 123-145
13. Chen L.-D., and Tan J. Technology adaptation in e-commerce: Key determinants of virtual store acceptance. Eur Manage J 22 1 (2004) 74-86
14. Childers T.L., Carr C.L., Peck J., and Carson S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J Retail 77 4 (2001) 511-535
15. Dahlberg T., Mallat N., and Oorni A. Trust enhanced technology acceptance model - Consumer acceptance of mobile payment solution. Proceedings of the CIC roundtable 2003 (2003) web.hhs.se/cic/roundtable2003/papers/D31_Dahlberg_et_al.pdf
16. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13 3 (1989) 319-339
17. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
18. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22 (1992) 1111-1132
19. eMarketer.com. Online retail marches ever upward (2006). www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1003754 [January 5]
20. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 8 1 (1981) 39-50
21. Gefen D. What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J Manage Inform Syst 21 1 (2004) 263-288
22. Gefen, D., and Straub D. Managing user trust in B2C e-services. e-Serv J 2 2 (2003) 7-24
23. Gefen D., Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 50 3 (2003) 307-321
24. Grewal D., Lindsey-Mullikin J., and Munger J. Loyalty in e-tailing: a conceptual framework. J Rel Market 2 3/4 (2004) 31-49
25. Harris L.C., and Goode M.M.H. The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics. J Retail 80 2 (2004) 139-158
26. Hirschman E.C., and Holbrook M.B. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J Market 46 3 (1982) 92-101
27. Hsu C.L., and Lu H.P. Why do people play on-line game(s)? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inform Manage 41 7 (2004) 853-868
28. Huang L., Lu M.-T., and Wong B.K. The impact of power distance on email acceptance: evidence from the PRC. J Comp Inform Syst 44 1 (2003) 93-101
29. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., and Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Q 21 3 (1997) 279-305
30. Internet retailer Forrester's forecast. full speed ahead (2004). internetretailer.com/printArticle.asp?id=12766 [September]
31. Janda S., Trocchia P.J., and Gwinner K.P. Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality. Int J Serv Ind Manage 13 5 (2002) 412-433
32. Joines J.L., Scherer C.W., and Scheufele D.A. Exploring motivations for consumer web use and their implications for e-commerce. J Consum Market 20 2 (2003) 90-108
33. Kim E.Y., and Kim Y.-K. Predicting online purchase intentions for clothing products. Eur J Market 38 7 (2004) 883-897
34. Kim S., and Stoel L. Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. J. Retail. Consum Serv 11 2 (2004) 109-117
35. Lee M.K.O., Cheung C.M.K., and Chen Z. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inform Manage 42 8 (2005) 1095-1104
36. Li D., Lou H., Day J., and Coombs G. The effect of affiliation motivation on the intention to use groupware in an MBA program. J Comp Inform Syst 44 3 (2004) 1-8
37. Loiacono E.T., Watson R.T., and Goodhue D.L. WEBQUAL: a measure of website quality. In: Evans K., and Scheer L. (Eds). Marketing educators' conference: Marketing theory and application 2002 13 (2002) 432-437
38. Lucas Jr. H.C., and Spider V.K. Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Dec. Sci. 30 2 (1999) 291-310
39. Luo H., and Luo W. Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. Eur J Inform Syst 9 2 (2000) 91-103
40. McKnight DH, Chervany NL. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001/2002; 6(2): 35-60.
41. Moorman C., Zaltman G., and Deshpande R. Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J. Market. Res. 29 3 (1992) 314-328
42. O'cass A., and Fenech T. Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users web retailing behavior. J. Retail. Consum Serv 10 2 (2003) 81-94
43. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., and Malhotra A. E-S-Qual: A multiple item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Report No. 04-112 (2004), Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA. http://www.msi.org/msi/publication_summary.cfm?publication=780 www.msi.org/msi/publication_summary.cfm?publication=780
44. Parsons A.G. Non-functional motives for online shoppers: why we click. J Consum Market 19 5 (2002) 380-392
45. Pavlou P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int J Electron Commer 7 3 (2003) 101-134
46. Peterson R.A., Balasubramanian S., and Bronnenberg B.J. Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. J Acad Market Sci 25 4 (1997) 329-346
47. Rainie L., and Horrigan J. A decade of adoption: How the internet has woven itself into American life. Pew internet & american life project (2005). http://www.pewinternet.org/PFF/r/148/report_display.asp www.pewinternet.org/PFF/r/148/report_display.asp
48. Reichheld F.F., and Schefter P. E-loyalty. Harv. Bus. Rev. 78 4 (2000) 105-113
49. Rose G., and Straub D. Predicting general IT use: applying TAM to the Arabic world. J Glob Inform Manage 6 3 (1998) 39-46
50. Shang R.-A., Chen Y.-C., and Shen L. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Inf Manage 42 3 (2005) 401-413
51. Suh B., and Han I. Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 1 3/4 (2002) 247-263
52. Sultan F., and Mooraj H.A. Designing a trust-based E-business strategy. Market Manage 10 4 (2001) 40-45
53. Townsend A.M., Demarie S.M., and Hendrickson A.R. Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: anticipation, system evaluation and performance. Inf Syst J 11 3 (2001) 213-227
54. Van der Heijden H., and Verhagen T. Online store image: conceptual foundations and empirical measurement. Inf Manage 41 5 (2004) 609-617
55. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform Syst Res 11 4 (2000) 342-365
56. Vijayasarathy L.R. Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 41 6 (2004) 747-762
57. Wang S., Beatty S.E., and Foxx W. Signaling the trustworthiness of small online retailers. J Interact Market 18 1 (2004) 53-69
58. Warrington T.B., Abgrab N.J., and Caldwell H.M. Building trust to develop competitive advantage in e-business relationships. Compet Rev 10 2 (2000) 160-168
59. Williamson AW. College Students Embrace the Web. eMarketer.com www.imediaconnection.com/content/8237.asp 2006 [February 10].
60. Wolfinbarger M., and Gilly M.C. e-TailQ: dimesionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. J. Retail. 79 3 (2003) 183-198
61. Yoo B., and Donthu N. Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Q J Electron Commer 2 1 (2001) 31-46
62. Zeithaml V.A., Parasuraman A., and Malhotra A. A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implications for future research and managerial practice. Working Paper No.00-115 (2000), Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA