Understanding post-adoption IS usage stages: An empirical assessment of self-service information systems

Information Systems Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 219-244

  Saeed, Khawaja Asjad ^a   Abdinnour, Sue ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Discriminant analysis; IS acceptance; IS usage stages; Post adoption IS usage; Self service IS

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT; IS ACCEPTANCE; LEARNING ORIENTATION; POST ADOPTIONS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SELF-SERVICE IS; USER PERCEPTIONS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84876130132     PISSN: 13501917     EISSN: 13652575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00389.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agarwal, R. (2000) Individual acceptance of information technologies. In: Framing the Domains of IT Management: Project the Future through the Past, Zmud, R.W. (ed.), pp. 85-104. Pinnaflex Press, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
2. Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9, 204-215.
3. Ahuja, M.K. & Thatcher, J.B. (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoptive information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 29, 427-459.
4. Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D. & Warshaw, P.R. (1992) Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45, 659-686.
5. Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
6. Barczak, G., Ellen, P.S., Bruce, K. & Pilling, B.K. (1997) Developing typologies of consumer motives for use of technologically based banking services. Journal of Business Research, 38, 131-139.
7. Beaudry, A. & Pinnsonneault, A. (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: a coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 493-534.
8. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370.
9. Brancheau, J.C. & Wetherbe, J.C. (1990) The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end user computing. Information Systems Research, 1, 115-143.
10. Burton-Jones, A. & Straub, D.W. (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17, 28-246.
11. Carter, L. & Bélanger, F. (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25.
12. Chan, S.C.H. & Ngai, E.W.T. (2007) A qualitative study of information technology adoption: how ten organizations adopted Web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17, 289-315.
13. Cooper, R.B. & Zmud, R.W. (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36, 123-130.
14. Curran, J.M. & Meuter, M.L. (2005) Self service technology adoption: comparing three technologies. Journal of Service Research, 19, 103-113.
15. DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M.S. (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
16. Devaraj, S. & Kohli, R. (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49, 273-289.
17. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
18. Gioia, D. & Manz, C. (1985) Link cognition & behavior: a script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 527-539.
19. Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C.R. (1993) Understanding strategic change: the contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1052-1081.
20. Griffith, T.L. (1999) Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24, 472-488.
21. Grover, V. & Saeed, K.A. (2004) Strategic orientation and performance of internet-based businesses. Information Systems Journal, 14, 23-42.
22. Huberty, C.J. (1984) Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 179-171.
23. Jain, V. & Kanungo, S. (2005) Beyond perceptions and usage: impact of nature of the information system use on information system-enabled productivity. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 113-136.
24. Jasperson, J., Cater, P.E. & Zmud, R.W. (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behavior associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29, 525-557.
25. Johnson, B.M. & Rice, R.E. (1987) Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
26. Johnson, D.S., Bardhi, F. & Dunn, D.T. (2008) Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self service technology: the role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 416-443.
27. Lassila, K.S. & Brancheau, J.C. (1999) Adoption and utilization of commercial software packages: exploring utilization equilibria, transitions, triggers, and tracks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 63-90.
28. Leidner, D.E. & Elam, J.J. (1993) Executive information systems: their impact on executive decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 139-156.
29. Massetti, B. & Zmud, B. (1996) Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: strategies and illustrative examples. MIS Quarterly, 20, 331-345.
30. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I. & Bitner, M.J. (2000) Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.
31. Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R. & Tanniru, M. (2000) Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly, 23, 365-396.
32. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA.
33. Orlikowski, W.J. & Gash, D.C. (1994) Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 174-207.
34. Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J., Okamura, K. & Fujimoto, M. (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organizational Science, 6, 423-444.
35. Premkumar, G., Ramanurthy, K. & Sree, N. (1994) Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 157-187.
36. Reinders, M.J., Dabholkar, P.A. & Frambach, R.T. (2008) Consequences of forcing consumers to use technology-based self service. Journal of Service Research, 11, 107-123.
37. Saga, V. & Zmud, R.W. (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. In: Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology, Levine, L. (ed.), pp. 67-86. North Holland, New York, NY, USA.
38. Sharma, S. (1996) Applied Multivariate Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
39. Sinha, I. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1998) An integrated approach toward the spatial modeling of perceived customer. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 236-249.
40. Thomas, H. & Venkatraman, N. (1988) Research on strategic groups: progress and prognosis. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 537-554.
41. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
42. Venkatesh, V. & Speier, C. (1999) Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of the mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 1-28.
43. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.