A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 596-603

  Peñarrocha Diago, María ^a   Balaguer Martí, José Carlos ^a   Peñarrocha Oltra, David ^a   Balaguer Martínez, José Francisco ^a   Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel ^a   Agustín Panadero, Rubén ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT-SUPPORTED DENTURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 85016583032     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., Agustín-Panadero, R., Bagán, L., Giménez, B., Peñarrocha, M., Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 19 (2014), 366–371.
2. Giménez, B., Özcan, M., Martínez-Rus, F., Pradíes, G., Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17 (2015), 54–64.
3. de França, D.G., Morais, M.H., das Neves, F.D., Barbosa, G., Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 22–28.
4. Abduo, J., Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. J Oral Implantol 40 (2012), 758–766.
5. Kapos, T., Evans, C., CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29 (2014), 117–136.
6. Ortorp, A., Jemt, T., Bäck, T., Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 (2005), 43–50.
7. Bergin, J.M., Rubenstein, J.E., Mancl, L., Brudvik, J.S., Raigrodski, A.J., An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 110 (2013), 243–251.
8. Rivara, F., Lumetti, S., Calciolari, E., Toffoli, A., Forlani, G., Manfredi, E., Photogrammetric method to measure the discrepancy between clinical and software-designed positions of implants. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 703–711.
9. Lee, S.J., Betensky, R.A., Gianneschi, G.E., Gallucci, G.O., Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 26 (2014), 715–719.
10. Paniz, G., Stellini, E., Meneghello, R., Cerardi, A., Gobbato, E.A., Bressan, E., The precision of fit of cast and milled full-arch implant-supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 (2013), 687–693.
11. Pradíes, G., Ferreiroa, A., Özcan, M., Giménez, B., Martínez-Rus, F., Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 145 (2014), 338–344.
12. Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C.J., Chuang, S.K., Weber, H.P., Gallucci, G.O., A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27 (2012), 102–110.
13. Koch, G.K., Gallucci, G.O., Lee, S.J., Accuracy in the digital workflow: from data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 749–754.
14. Joda, T., Brägger, U., Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 27 (2016), e185–e189.
15. Patzelt, S.B.M., Lamprinos, C., Stampf, S., Att, W., The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145 (2014), 542–551.
16. Lee, S.J., Gallucci, G.O., Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24 (2013), 111–115.
17. Wismeijer, D., Mans, R., Van Genuchten, M., Reijers, H.A., Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 25 (2013), 1113–1118.
18. Howell, K.J., McGlumphy, E.A., Drago, C., Knapik, G., Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 (2013), 228–240.
19. Al-Abdullah, K., Zandparsa, R., Finkelman, M., Hirayama, H., An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent 110 (2013), 90–100.
20. Park, J.I., Yoon, T.H., A three-dimensional image-superimposition CAD/CAM technique to record the position and angulation of the implant abutment screw access channel. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 57–60.
21. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2013), 11–21.
22. Sánchez-Monescillo, A., Sánchez-Turrión, A., Vellon-Domarco, E., Salinas-Goodier, C., Prados-Frutos, J.C., Photogrammetry impression technique: a case history report. Int J Prosthodont 29 (2016), 71–73.
23. Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., Agustín-Panadero, R., Pradíes, G., Gomar-Vercher, S., Peñarrocha-Diago, M., Maxillary full-arch immediately loaded implant-supported fixed prosthesis designed and produced by photogrammetry and digital printing: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 26 (2017), 75–81.
24. Agustín-Panadero, R., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., Gomar-Vercher, S., Peñarrocha-Diago, M., Stereophotogrammetry for recording the position of multiple implants: technical description. Int J Prosthodont 28 (2015), 631–636.
25. Doménech JM, Granero R. Extraction of N random integers from LN to HN. Macro RNDI for SPSS statistics: exhaustive sampling [computer program]. Version 2011.09.09. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB); 2011. Available at: http://www.metodo.uab.cat/macros.htm. Accessed February 2, 2015.
26. Pastor, M.A., López-Roig, S., Lledó A., Peñacoba, C., Velasco, L., Schweiger-Gallo, I., Combining motivational and volitional strategies to promote unsupervised walking in patients with fibromyalgia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 15, 2014, 120.
27. Boronat, A., Peñarrocha, M., Carrillo, C., Marti, E., Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective short-term follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66 (2008), 246–250.
28. Buser, D., Weber, H.P., Lang, N.P., Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1 (1990), 33–40.
29. Brånemark, P.I., Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 50 (1983), 399–410.
30. Saaby, M., Karring, E., Schou, S., Isidor, F., Factors influencing severity of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 27 (2016), 7–12.
31. Jokstad, A., Shokati, B., New 3D technologies applied to assess the long-term clinical effects of misfit of the full jaw fixed prosthesis on dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 26 (2015), 1129–1134.
32. Chen, C.J., Papaspyridakos, P., Guze, K., Singh, M., Weber, H.P., Gallucci, G., Effect of misfit of cement-retained implant single crowns on crestal bone changes. Int J Prosthodont 26 (2013), 135–137.
33. Jemt, T., Book, K., Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 (1996), 620–625.