An efficient and user-friendly tool for machine translation quality estimation

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3560-3564

  Shah, Kashif ^a   Turchi, Marco ^b   Specia, Lucia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Machine translation; Translation evaluation; Translation quality estimation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

INTERNAL FEATURES; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; OPEN SOURCE FRAMEWORKS; PREDICTION MODEL; QUALITY PREDICTION; RUN-TIME PERFORMANCE; TRANSLATION QUALITY; USER-FRIENDLY TOOL;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 85016496290     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. E. Avramidis. 2013. Sentence-level ranking with quality estimation. Machine Translation, 28:1-20.
2. N. Bach, F. Huang, and Y. Al-Onaizan. 2011. Goodness: a method for measuring machine translation confidence. In ACL11, pages 211-219, Portland.
3. O. Bojar, C. Buck, C. Callison-Burch, C. Federmann, B. Haddow, P. Koehn, C. Monz, M. Post, R. Soricut, and L. Specia. 2013. Findings of the 2013 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In WMT13, pages 1-44, Sofia.
4. C. Callison-Burch, P. Koehn, C. Monz, M. Post, R. Soricut, and L. Specia. 2012. Findings of the 2012 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In WMT12, pages 10-51, Montréal.
5. Y. He, Y. Ma, J. van Genabith, and A. Way. 2010. Bridging SMT and TM with Translation Recommendation. In ACL10, pages 622-630, Uppsala.
6. F. Josef och and H. Ney. 2003. A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-51.
7. M. Potet, E. Esperana-Rodier, L. Besacier, and H. Blanchon. 2012. Collection of a large database of French-english SMT output corrections. In LREC12, Istanbul, Turkey.
8. K. Shah, E. Avramidis, E Biçici, and L Specia. 2013a. Quest - design, implementation and extensions of a framework for machine translation quality estimation. Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics, 100:19-30.
9. K. Shah, T. Cohn, and L. Specia. 2013b. An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Features for Translation Quality Estimation. In Proceedings of MT Summit XIV, pages 167-174.
10. R. Soricut and A. Echihabi. 2010. Trustrank: Inducing trust in automatic translations via ranking. In ACL11, pages 612-621, Uppsala.
11. L. Specia, M. Turchi, N. Cancedda, M. Dymetman, and N. Cristianini. 2009. Estimating the Sentence-Level Quality of Machine Translation Systems. In EAMT09, pages 28-37, Barcelona.
12. L. Specia, D. Raj, and M. Turchi. 2010. Machine translation evaluation versus quality estimation. Machine Translation, 24(1):39-50.
13. L. Specia, K. Shah, J.G.C. de Souza, and T. Cohn. 2013. Quest - a translation quality estimation framework. In 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, ACL-2013, pages 79-84, Sofia, Bulgaria.
14. L. Specia. 2011. Exploiting objective annotations for measuring translation post-editing effort. In EAMT11, pages 73-80, Leuven.
15. A. Stolcke. 2002. SRILM - An Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing, pages 901-904, Denver, CO.