Potential energy landscapes identify the information-theoretic nature of the epigenome

Nature Genetics

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 719-729

  Jenkinson, Garrett ^a,b   Pujadas, Elisabet ^a,b   Goutsias, John ^b   Feinberg, Andrew P ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; IGF2BP1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SALL1 PROTEIN; SATB2 PROTEIN; SMAD7 PROTEIN; TGIF1 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FKHRL1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZIC2 PROTEIN; HYDROGEN SULFITE; SULFITE;

AGING; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO; ENTROPY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPIGENETICS; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; HUMAN GENOME; KERATINOCYTE; LIVER CANCER; LUNG CANCER; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING; ALGORITHM; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

AGING; ALGORITHMS; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENTROPY; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EPIGENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SULFITES;

EID: 85016117149     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3811     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Waddington, C.H. The Strategy of the Genes (Allen and Unwin, 1957).
2. Feinberg, A.P. & Irizarry, R.A. Stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (Suppl. 1), 1757-1764 (2010).
3. Hansen, K.D. et al. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 43, 768-775 (2011).
4. Pujadas, E. & Feinberg, A.P. Regulated noise in the epigenetic landscape of development and disease. Cell 148, 1123-1131 (2012).
5. Timp, W. & Feinberg, A.P. Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 497-510 (2013).
6. Landan, G. et al. Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues. Nat. Genet. 44, 1207-1214 (2012).
7. Shipony, Z. et al. Dynamic and static maintenance of epigenetic memory in pluripotent and somatic cells. Nature 513, 115-119 (2014).
8. Bock, C. Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 705-719 (2012).
9. Pressé, S., Ghosh, K., Lee, J. & Dill, K.A. Principles of maximum entropy and maximum caliber in statistical physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1115-1141 (2013).
10. Cedar, H. & Bergman, Y. Programming of DNA methylation patterns. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 97-117 (2012).
11. Heyn, H. et al. Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10522-10527 (2012).
12. Ziller, M.J. et al. Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome. Nature 500, 477-481 (2013).
13. Bell, R.E. et al. Enhancer methylation dynamics contribute to cancer plasticity and patient mortality. Genome Res. 26, 601-611 (2016).
14. Eden, E., Navon, R., Steinfeld, I., Lipson, D. & Yakhini, Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 48 (2009).
15. Mohn, F. et al. Lineage-specific Polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol. Cell 30, 755-766 (2008).
16. Dixon, J.R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
17. Nora, E.P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
18. Gibcus, J.H. & Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 49, 773-782 (2013).
19. Huang, J., Marco, E., Pinello, L. & Yuan, G.C. Predicting chromatin organization using histone marks. Genome Biol. 16, 162 (2015).
20. Cover, T.M. & Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory (John Wiley & Sons, 1991).
21. Savarese, F. et al. Satb1 and Satb2 regulate embryonic stem cell differentiation and Nanog expression. Genes Dev. 23, 2625-2638 (2009).
22. Karantzali, E. et al. Sall1 regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation in association with Nanog. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 1037-1045 (2011).
23. Liu, K. et al. The multiple roles for Sox2 in stem cell maintenance and tumorigenesis. Cell. Signal. 25, 1264-1271 (2013).
24. Ozair, M.Z., Noggle, S., Warmflash, A., Krzyspiak, J.E. & Brivanlou, A.H. SMAD7 directly converts human embryonic stem cells to telencephalic fate by a default mechanism. Stem Cells 31, 35-47 (2013).
25. Gopinath, S.D., Webb, A.E., Brunet, A. & Rando, T.A. FOXO3 promotes quiescence in adult muscle stem cells during the process of self-renewal. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 414-426 (2014).
26. Mahaira, L.G. et al. IGF2BP1 expression in human mesenchymal stem cells significantly affects their proliferation and is under the epigenetic control of TET1/2 demethylases. Stem Cells Dev. 23, 2501-2512 (2014).
27. Lee, B.K. et al. Tgif1 counterbalances the activity of core pluripotency factors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 13, 52-60 (2015).
28. Luo, Z. et al. Zic2 is an enhancer-binding factor required for embryonic stem cell specification. Mol. Cell 57, 685-694 (2015).
29. Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M.A. & Mirny, L.A. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 390-403 (2013).
30. Fortin, J.P. & Hansen, K.D. Reconstructing A/B compartments as revealed by Hi-C using long-range correlations in epigenetic data. Genome Biol. 16, 180 (2015).
31. Dixon, J.R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331-336 (2015).
32. Timp, W. et al. Large hypomethylated blocks as a universal defining epigenetic alteration in human solid tumors. Genome Med. 6, 61 (2014).
33. Berman, B.P. et al. Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina-associated domains. Nat. Genet. 44, 40-46 (2011).
34. Yu, H. et al. Tet3 regulates synaptic transmission and homeostatic plasticity via DNA oxidation and repair. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 836-843 (2015).
35. Nakamura, T. et al. Fusion of the nucleoporin gene NUP98 to HOXA9 by the chromosome translocation t(7;11)(p15;p15) in human myeloid leukaemia. Nat. Genet. 12, 154-158 (1996).
36. Kaneda, H. et al. FOXQ1 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer and enhances tumorigenicity and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 70, 2053-2063 (2010).
37. Schlaeger, T.M. et al. A comparison of non-integrating reprogramming methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 58-63 (2015).
38. Vandiver, A.R. et al. Age and sun exposure-related widespread genomic blocks of hypomethylation in nonmalignant skin. Genome Biol. 16, 80 (2015).
39. Hansen, K.D. et al. Large-scale hypomethylated blocks associated with Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell immortalization. Genome Res. 24, 177-184 (2014).
40. Wu, H., Caffo, B., Jaffee, H.A., Irizarry, R.A. & Feinberg, A.P. Redefining CpG islands using hidden Markov models. Biostatistics 11, 499-514 (2010).
41. Visel, A., Minovitsky, S., Dubchak, I. & Pennacchio, L.A. VISTA Enhancer Browser-a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D88-D92 (2007).
42. Wen, B. et al. Euchromatin islands in large heterochromatin domains are enriched for CTCF binding and differentially DNA-methylated regions. BMC Genomics 13, 566 (2012).
43. Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948-951 (2008).
44. Huyer, W. & Neumaier, A. Global optimization by multilevel coordinate search. J. Glob. Optim. 14, 331-355 (1999).
45. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P. Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
46. Mohammad-Djafari, A. in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods (eds. Smith, C.R., Erickson, G.J. & Neudorfer, P.O.) 221-234 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991).
47. Lin, J. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37, 145-151 (1991).
48. Favorov, A. et al. Exploring massive, genome scale datasets with the Genometri Corr package. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002529 (2012).
49. Rao, S.S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
50. Murtagh, F. & Legendre, P. Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward's criterion? J. Classif. 31, 274-295 (2014).