Somatosensory Cortex Plays an Essential Role in Forelimb Motor Adaptation in Mice

Neuron

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1493-1503.e6

  Mathis, Mackenzie Weygandt ^a   Mathis, Alexander ^a   Uchida, Naoshige ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

force field adaptation; motor adaptation; mouse; optogenetics; primary somatosensory cortex; sensorimotor learning; sensory prediction error

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN STEM; CEREBELLUM; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORELIMB; LEARNING; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; PHOTOINHIBITION; REINFORCEMENT; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; FORELIMB; LEARNING; MALE; MICE; MOVEMENT; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 85015982914     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.049     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adams, R.A., Shipp, S., Friston, K.J., Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Struct. Funct. 218 (2013), 611–643.
2. Albert, S.T., Shadmehr, R., The Neural Feedback Response to Error As a Teaching Signal for the Motor Learning System. J. Neurosci. 36 (2016), 4832–4845.
3. Berniker, M., Kording, K., Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat. Neurosci. 11 (2008), 1454–1461.
4. Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M., Frith, C.D., The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. Neuroimage 10 (1999), 448–459.
5. Bostan, A.C., Strick, P.L., The cerebellum and basal ganglia are interconnected. Neuropsychol. Rev. 20 (2010), 261–270.
6. Bower, J.M., Beermann, D.H., Gibson, J.M., Shambes, G.M., Welker, W., Principles of organization of a cerebro-cerebellar circuit. Micromapping the projections from cerebral (SI) to cerebellar (granule cell layer) tactile areas of rats. Brain Behav. Evol. 18 (1981), 1–18.
7. Braun, C., Schweizer, R., Elbert, T., Birbaumer, N., Taub, E., Differential activation in somatosensory cortex for different discrimination tasks. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000), 446–450.
8. Brown, I.E., Bower, J.M., The influence of somatosensory cortex on climbing fiber responses in the lateral hemispheres of the rat cerebellum after peripheral tactile stimulation. J. Neurosci. 22 (2002), 6819–6829.
9. Buonomano, D.V., Merzenich, M.M., Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21 (1998), 149–186.
10. Caligiore, D., Pezzulo, G., Baldassarre, G., Bostan, A.C., Strick, P.L., Doya, K., Helmich, R.C., Dirkx, M., Houk, J., Jörntell, H., et al. Consensus paper: towards a systems-level view of cerebellar function: the interplay between cerebellum, basal ganglia, and cortex. Cerebellum 16 (2017), 203–229.
11. Cohen, J.Y., Haesler, S., Vong, L., Lowell, B.B., Uchida, N., Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 482 (2012), 85–88.
12. Cohen, J.Y., Amoroso, M.W., Uchida, N., Serotonergic neurons signal reward and punishment on multiple timescales. eLife, 4, 2015, e06346.
13. Diedrichsen, J., Hashambhoy, Y., Rane, T., Shadmehr, R., Neural correlates of reach errors. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005), 9919–9931.
14. Feldman, D.E., Brecht, M., Map plasticity in somatosensory cortex. Science 310 (2005), 810–815.
15. Fine, M.S., Thoroughman, K.A., Motor adaptation to single force pulses: sensitive to direction but insensitive to within-movement pulse placement and magnitude. J. Neurophysiol. 96 (2006), 710–720.
16. Fromm, C., Evarts, E.V., Pyramidal tract neurons in somatosensory cortex: central and peripheral inputs during voluntary movement. Brain Res. 238 (1982), 186–191.
17. Galea, J.M., Mallia, E., Rothwell, J., Diedrichsen, J., The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 18 (2015), 597–602.
18. Gao, J.H., Parsons, L.M., Bower, J.M., Xiong, J., Li, J., Fox, P.T., Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science 272 (1996), 545–547.
19. Gonzalez Castro, L.N., Hadjiosif, A.M., Hemphill, M.A., Smith, M.A., Environmental consistency determines the rate of motor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 1050–1061.
20. Guo, Z.V., Li, N., Huber, D., Ophir, E., Gutnisky, D., Ting, J.T., Feng, G., Svoboda, K., Flow of cortical activity underlying a tactile decision in mice. Neuron 81 (2014), 179–194.
21. Guo, J.-Z., Graves, A.R., Guo, W.W., Zheng, J., Lee, A., Rodríguez-González, J., Li, N., Macklin, J.J., Phillips, J.W., Mensh, B.D., et al. Cortex commands the performance of skilled movement. eLife, 4, 2015, e10774.
22. Herzfeld, D.J., Vaswani, P.A., Marko, M.K., Shadmehr, R., A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning. Science 345 (2014), 1349–1353.
23. Hikosaka, O., Tanaka, M., Sakamoto, M., Iwamura, Y., Deficits in manipulative behaviors induced by local injections of muscimol in the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Brain Res. 325 (1985), 375–380.
24. Hoogland, T.M., De Gruijl, J.R., Witter, L., Canto, C.B., De Zeeuw, C.I., Role of synchronous activation of cerebellar purkinje cell ensembles in multi-joint movement control. Curr. Biol. 25 (2015), 1157–1165.
25. Huang, V.S., Haith, A., Mazzoni, P., Krakauer, J.W., Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron 70 (2011), 787–801.
26. Hwang, E.J., Shadmehr, R., Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state. J. Neural Eng. 2 (2005), S266–S278.
27. Inoue, M., Uchimura, M., Kitazawa, S., Error signals in motor cortices drive adaptation in reaching. Neuron 90 (2016), 1114–1126.
28. Ito, M., Error detection and representation in the olivo-cerebellar system. Front. Neural Circuits, 7, 2013, 1.
29. Izawa, J., Shadmehr, R., Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, 2011, e1002012.
30. Kaas, J.H., What, if anything, is SI? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. Physiol. Rev. 63 (1983), 206–231.
31. Kaas, J.H., Nelson, R.J., Sur, M., Lin, C.S., Merzenich, M.M., Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. Science 204 (1979), 521–523.
32. Kalman, R.E., A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Eng. 82 (1960), 35–45.
33. Kawato, M., Learning internal models of the motor apparatus. Bloedel, J.R., Ebner, T.J., (eds.) The Acquisition of Motor Behaviors in Vertebrates, 1996, MIT Press, 409–430.
34. Kawato, M., Gomi, H., A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biol. Cybern. 68 (1992), 95–103.
35. Kelly, R.M., Strick, P.L., Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003), 8432–8444.
36. Krebs, H.I., Brashers-Krug, T., Rauch, S.L., Savage, C.R., Hogan, N., Rubin, R.H., Fischman, A.J., Alpert, N.M., Robot-aided functional imaging: application to a motor learning study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6 (1998), 59–72.
37. Li, C.-S.R., Padoa-Schioppa, C., Bizzi, E., Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron 30 (2001), 593–607.
38. Li, N., Daie, K., Svoboda, K., Druckmann, S., Robust neuronal dynamics in premotor cortex during motor planning. Nature 532 (2016), 459–464.
39. Marini, R., Rubia, F.J., Kolb, F.P., Bauswein, E., Cortical influence upon cerebellar Purkinje cells responding to natural, peripheral stimulation in the cat. Neurosci. Lett. 33 (1982), 55–59.
40. Mazzoni, P., Krakauer, J.W., An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 26 (2006), 3642–3645.
41. McDougle, S.D., Bond, K.M., Taylor, J.A., Explicit and implicit processes constitute the fast and slow processes of sensorimotor learning. J. Neurosci. 35 (2015), 9568–9579.
42. Nelder, J., Mead, R., A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7 (1965), 308–313.
43. Omrani, M., Murnaghan, C.D., Pruszynski, J.A., Scott, S.H., Distributed task-specific processing of somatosensory feedback for voluntary motor control. eLife, 5, 2016, e13141.
44. Pavlides, C., Miyashita, E., Asanuma, H., Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 70 (1993), 733–741.
45. Penfield, W., Boldrey, E., Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60 (1937), 389–443.
46. Petrof, I., Viaene, A.N., Sherman, S.M., Properties of the primary somatosensory cortex projection to the primary motor cortex in the mouse. J. Neurophysiol. 113 (2015), 2400–2407.
47. Proville, R.D., Spolidoro, M., Guyon, N., Dugué, G.P., Selimi, F., Isope, P., Popa, D., Léna, C., Cerebellum involvement in cortical sensorimotor circuits for the control of voluntary movements. Nat. Neurosci. 17 (2014), 1233–1239.
48. Rabe, K., Livne, O., Gizewski, E.R., Aurich, V., Beck, A., Timmann, D., Donchin, O., Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. J. Neurophysiol. 101 (2009), 1961–1971.
49. Sachidhanandam, S., Sreenivasan, V., Kyriakatos, A., Kremer, Y., Petersen, C.C.H., Membrane potential correlates of sensory perception in mouse barrel cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16 (2013), 1671–1677.
50. Schaefer, S.Y., Shelly, I.L., Thoroughman, K.A., Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions. J. Neurophysiol. 107 (2012), 1247–1256.
51. Shadmehr, R., Krakauer, J.W., A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp. Brain Res. 185 (2008), 359–381.
52. Shadmehr, R., Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14 (1994), 3208–3224.
53. Shadmehr, R., Smith, M.A., Krakauer, J.W., Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33 (2010), 89–108.
54. Sing, G.C., Orozco, S.P., Smith, M.A., Limb motion dictates how motor learning arises from arbitrary environmental dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 109 (2013), 2466–2482.
55. Smith, M.A., Shadmehr, R., Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J. Neurophysiol. 93 (2005), 2809–2821.
56. Smith, M.A., Ghazizadeh, A., Shadmehr, R., Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol., 4, 2006, e179.
57. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G., Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. 1998, Cambridge University Press.
58. Taylor, J.A., Ivry, R.B., The role of strategies in motor learning. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1251 (2012), 1–12.
59. Taylor, J.A., Krakauer, J.W., Ivry, R.B., Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. J. Neurosci. 34 (2014), 3023–3032.
60. Thoroughman, K.A., Shadmehr, R., Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999), 8573–8588.
61. Todorov, E., Jordan, M.I., Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002), 1226–1235.
62. Tomberg, C., Desmedt, J.E., Failure to recognise objects by active touch (astereognosia) results from lesion of parietal-cortex representation of finger kinaesthesis. Lancet 354 (1999), 393–394.
63. Tseng, Y.W., Diedrichsen, J., Krakauer, J.W., Shadmehr, R., Bastian, A.J., Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J. Neurophysiol. 98 (2007), 54–62.
64. Vidoni, E.D., Acerra, N.E., Dao, E., Meehan, S.K., Boyd, L.A., Role of the primary somatosensory cortex in motor learning: An rTMS study. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 93 (2010), 532–539.
65. Vinueza Veloz, M.F., Zhou, K., Bosman, L.W.J., Potters, J.-W., Negrello, M., Seepers, R.M., Strydis, C., Koekkoek, S.K.E., De Zeeuw, C.I., Cerebellar control of gait and interlimb coordination. Brain Struct. Funct. 220 (2015), 3513–3536.
66. von Helmholtz, H., Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. 1867, Leopold Voss, Leipzig.
67. Wallman, J., Fuchs, A.F., Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 80 (1998), 2405–2416.
68. Wolpert, D.M., Miall, R.C., Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9 (1996), 1265–1279.
69. Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z., Jordan, M.I., An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269 (1995), 1880–1882.
70. Wolpert, D.M., Miall, R.C., Kawato, M., Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2 (1998), 338–347.
71. Wolpert, D.M., Diedrichsen, J., Flanagan, J.R., Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12 (2011), 739–751.
72. Woolsey, T.A., Van der Loos, H., The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res. 17 (1970), 205–242.
73. Zhao, S., Ting, J.T., Atallah, H.E., Qiu, L., Tan, J., Gloss, B., Augustine, G.J., Deisseroth, K., Luo, M., Graybiel, A.M., et al. Cell type–specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function. Nat. Methods 8 (2011), 745–752.