Nanofibrillated cellulose: properties reinvestigated

Cellulose

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1933-1945

  Naderi, Ali ^a  

^a Verso Corporation   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Barrier properties; Centrifugation; Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC); Rheological properties; Tensile strength properties

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CENTRIFUGATION; RHEOLOGY;

BARRIER PROPERTIES; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (NFC); RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTY; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS; TENSILE STRENGTH PROPERTIES;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

CELLULOSE; RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 85015648665     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-017-1258-1     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Berot S, Blassel C, Gaillard C, Garnier C, Doublier JL (2010) Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions after freezing. Carbohydr Polym 80(3):677–686. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.045
2. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574
3. Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindström T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose-nanoclayt biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4:6622–6628
4. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A (2011) Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohydr Polym 83(4):1740–1748. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.036
5. Berglund LA (2005) Cellulose-based nanocomposites. In: Mohanty A, Misra M, Drzal L (eds) Natural fibres, biopolymers and biocomposites. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, pp 807–832
6. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84(3):975–983. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.052
7. Bessonoff M, Paltakari J (2015) A rapid method for the production of fibrillar cellulose films and an insight on their properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 30(1):142–148
8. Borch J (2002) Handbook of physical testing of paper, vol 2, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
9. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrès Q, Pèlach MÀ, Mutjé P (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review. Carbohydr Polym 154:151–166. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.117
10. Brännvall E (2007) Aspects on strength delivery and higher utilisation of the strength potential of softwood kraft pulp fibres. Doctoral thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
11. de Kort DW, Veen SJ, Van As H, Bonn D, Velikov KP, van Duynhoven JPM (2016) Yielding and flow of cellulose microfibril dispersions in the presence of a charged polymer. Soft Matter 12(21):4739–4744. doi:10.1039/c5sm02869h
12. Dong H, Snyder JF, Williams KS, Andzelm JW (2013) Cation-Induced hydrogels of cellulose nanofibrils with tunable moduli. Biomacromol 14(9):3338–3345. doi:10.1021/bm400993f
13. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16(6):220–227. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004
14. Fall AB, Lindström SB, Sundman O, Ödberg L, Wågberg L (2011) Colloidal stability of aqueous nanofibrillated cellulose dispersions. Langmuir 27:11332–11338
15. Fall AB, Burman A, Wågberg L (2014) Cellulosic nanofibrils from eucalyptus, acacia and pine fibers. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29(1):176–184
16. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2013) Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties. Carbohydr Polym 93(1):172–177. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.069
17. Fukuzumi H, Tanaka R, Saito T, Isogai A (2014) Dispersion stability and aggregation behavior of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in water as a function of salt addition. Cellulose 21(3):1553–1559. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0180-z
18. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT, Wågberg L (2015) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromol. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01117
19. Gurnagul N, Page DH, Paice MG (1992) The effect of cellulose degradation on the strength of wood pulp fibres. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 07(3):152–154. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-1992-07-03-p152-154
20. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromol 9:1579–1585
21. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. Appl Polym Sci Symp 37:797–813
22. Hou QX, Liu W, Liu ZH, Bai LL (2007) Characteristics of wood cellulose fibers treated with periodate and bisulfite. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:7830–7837. doi:10.1021/ie0704750
23. Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19(1):137–145. doi:10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2
24. Jowkarderis L, van de Ven TM (2014) Intrinsic viscosity of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0292-5
25. Jowkarderis L, van de Ven TGM (2015) Rheology of semi-dilute suspensions of carboxylated cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 123:416–423. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.067
26. Karppinen A, Vesterinen A-H, Saarinen T, Pietikäinen P, Seppälä J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18(6):1381–1390. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9597-9
27. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19(6):1807–1819. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9766-5
28. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466
29. Laine J, Lindström T, Nordmark GG, Risinger G (2000) Studies on topochemical modification of cellulosic fibers. Part 1. Chemical conditions for the attachment of carboxymethyl cellulose onto fibers. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15:520–526. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-2000-15-05-p520-526
30. Landmér A (2015) Sambandet mellan cellulosakedjans polymerisationsgrad och styrkan i nanofibrillerad cellulosafilm. KTH, Stockholm
31. Larsson PA, Kochumalayil JJ, Wågberg L (2013) Oxygen and water vapour barrier films with low moisture sensitivity fabricated from self-cross-linking fibrillated cellulose. In: 15th fundamental research symposium: advances in pulp and paper research, Cambridge. The pulp and paper fundamental research society, pp 851–866
32. Larsson PA, Berglund LA, Wagberg L (2014) Ductile all-cellulose nanocomposite films fabricated from core-shell structured cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromol 15(6):2218–2223. doi:10.1021/bm500360c
33. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15(3):425–433. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9184-2
34. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90(2):735–764. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026
35. Lindström T (2016) From microfibrillar cellulose to nanocellulose applications—an account of the evolutionary developments. In: Paper presented at the 9th international paper and coating chemistry symposium/international paper physics conference Tokyo, Japan, October 29-November 1
36. Lindström T, Aulin C, Naderi A, Ankerfors M (2014) Microfibrillated cellulose. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. Wiley, New York
37. Liu A, Walther A, Ikkala O, Belova L, Berglund LA (2011) Clay nanopaper with tough cellulose nanofiber matrix for fire retardancy and gas barrier functions. Biomacromol 12(3):633–641. doi:10.1021/bm101296z
38. Lowys M-P, Desbrières J, Rinaudo M (2001) Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocolloid 15:25–32
39. Lozhechnikova A, Dax D, Vartiainen J, Willfor S, Xu C, Osterberg M (2014) Modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using amphiphilic block-structured galactoglucomannans. Carbohydr Polym 110:163–172. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.087
40. MacKintosh FC, Kas J, Janmey PA (1995) Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys Rev Lett 75:4425–4428. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4425
41. Medronho B, Romano A, Miguel M, Stigsson L, Lindman B (2012) Rationalizing cellulose (in)solubility: reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions. Cellulose 19(3):581–587. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9644-6
42. Naderi A, Lindström T (2014) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: effect of monovalent electrolytes on the rheological properties. Cellulose 21(5):3507–3514. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0394-0
43. Naderi A, Lindström T (2015) Rheological measurements on nanofibrillated cellulose systems: a science in progress. In: Monda HI (ed) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives: synthesis, modification and applications. Biochemistry research trends. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, pp 187–202
44. Naderi A, Lindström T (2016) A comparative study of the rheological properties of three different nanofibrillated cellulose systems. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31(3):354–363
45. Naderi A, Lindström T, Pettersson T (2014a) The state of carboxymethylated nanofibrils after homogenization-aided dilution from concentrated suspensions: a rheological perspective. Cellulose 21(4):2357–2368. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0329-9
46. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J (2014b) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies. Cellulose 21(3):1561–1571. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0192-8
47. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J (2015a) Repeated homogenization, a route for decreasing the energy consumption in the manufacturing process of carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose? Cellulose 22(2):1147–1157. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0576-4
48. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J, Flodberg G (2015b) Can redispersible low-charged nanofibrillated cellulose be produced by the addition of carboxymethyl cellulose? Nord Pulp Pap Res J 30(4):568–577. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-2015-30-04-p568-577
49. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J, Pettersson T, Flodberg G, Erlandsson J (2015c) Microfluidized carboxymethyl cellulose modified pulp: a nanofibrillated cellulose system with some attractive properties. Cellulose 22(2):1159–1173. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0577-3
50. Naderi A, Lindström T, Erlandsson J, Sundström J, Flodberg G (2016a) A comparative study of the properties of three nanofibrillated cellulose systems that have been produced at about the same energy consumption levels in the mechanical delamination step. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31(3):364–371
51. Naderi A, Lindström T, Weise CF, Flodberg G, Sundström J, Junel K, Erlandsson J, Runebjörk A (2016b) Phosphorylated nanofibrillated cellulose: production and properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31(1):22–31
52. Naderi A, Larsson PT, Stevanic JS, Lindström T, Erlandsson J (2017) Effect of the size of the charged group on the properties of alkoxylated NFCs. Cellulose 24(3):1307–1317. doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1190-4
53. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohydr Polym 112:432–439. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.092
54. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2016) Current progress in rheology of cellulose nanofibril suspensions. Biomacromol 17(7):2311–2320. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00668
55. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose I-beta from X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. JACS 124(31):9074–9082
56. Olié N (2016) Development of a protocol for measuring the tensile properties of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) films. Internship report, p 1–16, Polytech Grenoble (France)
57. Österberg M, Vartiainen J, Lucenius J, Hippi U, Seppala J, Serimaa R, Laine J (2013) A fast method to produce strong NFC films as a platform for barrier and functional materials. Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4640–4647
58. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromol 8(6):1934–1941
59. Parry RT (1993) Principles and applications of modified atmosphere packaging of foods, 1st edn. Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2137-2
60. Quennouz N, Hashmi SM, Choi HS, Kim JW, Osuji CO (2016) Rheology of cellulose nanofibrils in the presence of surfactants. Soft Matter 12(1):157–164. doi:10.1039/C5SM01803J
61. Saarinen T, Lille M, Seppälä J (2009) Technical aspects on rheological characterization of microfibrillar cellulose water suspensions. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 17:121–128
62. Saito T, Hirota M, Fukuzumi H, Tamura N, Heux L, Kimura S, Isogai A (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromol 10(7):1992–1996
63. Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromol 11(9):2195–2198
64. Shimizu M, Saito T, Isogai A (2016) Water-resistant and high oxygen-barrier nanocellulose films with interfibrillar cross-linkages formed through multivalent metal ions. J Memb Sci 500:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.002
65. Shogren RL, Peterson S, Evans KO, Kenar JA (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose gels from corn cobs. Carbohydr Polym 86:1351–1357
66. Siró I, Plackett D, Hedenqvist M, Ankerfors M, Lindström T (2011) Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci 119(5):2652–2660. doi:10.1002/app.32831
67. Sugiyama J, Vuong R, Chanzy H (1991) Electron diffraction study on the two crystalline phases occurring in native cellulose from an algal cell wall. Macromolecules 24(14):4168–4175. doi:10.1021/ma00014a033
68. Tanaka R, Saito T, Isogai A (2012) Cellulose nanofibrils prepared from softwood cellulose by TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO(2) systems in water at pH 4.8 or 6.8. Int J Biol Macromol 51(3):228–234. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.05.016
69. Tanaka R, Saito T, Ishii D, Isogai A (2014) Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement. Cellulose 21(3):1581–1589. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4
70. Tatsumi D, Ishioka S, Matsumoto T (2002) Effect of fiber concentration and axial ratio on the rheological properties of cellulose fiber suspensions. J Soc Rheol Jpn 30:27–32
71. Tatsumi D, Inaba D, Matsumoto T (2008) Layered structure and viscoelastic properties of wet pulp fiber networks. J Soc Rheol Jpn 36:235–239. doi:10.1678/rheology.36.235