Repeated homogenization, a route for decreasing the energy consumption in the manufacturing process of carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose?

Cellulose

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1147-1157

  Naderi, Ali ^a   Lindström, Tom ^a   Sundström, Jonas ^a  

^a INNVENTIA AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Delamination; Dilution; Energy; Homogenization; Mechanical properties; Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC); NFC film; Rheology

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; DELAMINATION; DETERIORATION; DILUTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; HOMOGENIZATION METHOD; MACHINERY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RHEOLOGY; SHEARING;

ENERGY; HIGH PRESSURE HOMOGENIZATION; HOMOGENIZATION PRESSURES; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTIONS; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (NFC); REDUCTION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION;

CELLULOSE;

EID: 84924293869     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0576-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ankerfors M (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose: energy-efficient preparation techniques and key properties. Licentiate thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
2. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17(3):559–574. doi:10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y
3. Dzuy NQ, Boger DV (1983) Yield stress measurement for concentrated suspensions. J Rheol (1978-present) 27(4):321–349. doi:10.1122/1.549709
4. Fall A (2013) Colloidal interactions and orientation of nanocellulose particles. PhD thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
5. Fujisawa S, Okita Y, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Preparation and characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films with free carboxyl groups. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):579–583. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.029
6. Grüneberger F, Künniger T, Zimmermann T, Arnold M (2014) Rheology of nanofibrillated cellulose/acrylate systems for coating applications. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0248-9
7. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindstroem T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038
8. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813
9. Iotti M, Gregersen Ø, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19(1):137–145. doi:10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2
10. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1):71–85. doi:10.1039/c0nr00583e
11. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A 89(2):461–466. doi:10.1007/s00339-007-4175-6
12. Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai A, Iwata T (2009) Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 10(9):2571–2576
13. Iwamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2014) Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polym J 46(1):73–76. doi:10.1038/pj.2013.64
14. Josefsson G, Tanem B, Li Y, Vullum P, Gamstedt EK (2013) Prediction of elastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from micromechanical modeling and nano-structure characterization by transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 20(2):761–770. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9868-8
15. Josset S, Orsolini P, Siqueira G, Tejado A, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T (2014) Energy consumption of the nanofibrillation of bleached pulp, wheat straw and recycled newspaper through a grinding process. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:167–175. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p167-175
16. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19(6):1807–1819. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9766-5
17. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466. doi:10.1002/anie.201001273
18. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15(3):425–433. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9184-2
19. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b
20. Naderi A, Lindström T (2014) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: effect of monovalent electrolytes on the rheological properties. Cellulose 21(5):3507–3514. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0394-0
21. Naderi A, Lindström T, Pettersson T (2014a) The state of carboxymethylated nanofibrils after homogenization-aided dilution from concentrated suspensions: a rheological perspective. Cellulose 21(4):2357–2368. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0329-9
22. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J (2014b) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies. Cellulose 21(3):1561–1571. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0192-8
23. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21(16):1595–1598. doi:10.1002/adma.200803174
24. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6):1934–1941
25. Siró I, Plackett D, Hedenqvist M, Ankerfors M, Lindström T (2011) Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 119(5):2652–2660
26. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ (2010) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresource Technol 101(15):5961–5968. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.104
27. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18(4):1097–1111. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z
28. Stelte W, Sanadi AR (2009) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hardwood and softwood pulps. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(24):11211–11219. doi:10.1021/ie9011672
29. Tanaka R, Saito T, Ishii D, Isogai A (2014) Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement. Cellulose 21(3):1581–1589. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4
30. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp, vol 37 (Proc. Cellul. Conf., 9th, 1982, Part 2), pp 815–827
31. Wågberg L, Winter L, Ödberg L, Lindström T (1987) On the charge stoichiometry upon adsorption of a cationic polyelectrolyte on cellulosic materials. Colloids Surf 27:163–173
32. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Axnäs K (2008) The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 24(3):784–795. doi:10.1021/la702481v
33. Yano H, Hashimoto T, Sato A, Nakagaito AN, Kitagawa K, Senba T, Ito A (2011) Cationic microfibrillated plant nanofibers with good tensile strength, comprising plant fibers modified with quaternary ammonium group-containing compounds and manufacture thereof and composites therefrom. JP2011162608A
34. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79(4):1086–1093. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045