Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1581-1589

  Tanaka, Reina ^a   Saito, Tsuguyuki ^a   Ishii, Daisuke ^a   Isogai, Akira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibril; Electric double layer; Length determination; Shear viscosity; TEMPO

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYLATION; DISPERSIONS; NANOFIBERS; SHEAR VISCOSITY; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT; WOOD;

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS; DOUBLE LAYERS; LENGTH DETERMINATION; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; MICROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS; NANOFIBRIL; TEMPO;

CELLULOSE;

CARBOXYLATION; CELLULOSE; DISPERSIONS; MEASUREMENT; VISCOSITY; WOOD;

EID: 84901233941     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Araki J (2013) Electrostatic or steric?-preparations and characterizations of well-dispersed systems containing rod-like nanowhiskers of crystalline polysaccharides. Soft Matter 9: 4125-4141.
2. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1998) Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surf A 142: 75-82.
3. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6: 612-626.
4. Boluk Y, Lahiji R, Zhao L, McDermott MT (2011) Suspension viscosities and shape parameter of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). Colloid Surf A 377: 297-303.
5. Brown RM Jr, Saxena IM, Kudlicka K (1996) Cellulose biosynthesis in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 1: 149-156.
6. Carr ME Jr, Hermans J (1978) Size and density of fibrin fibers from turbidity. Macromolecules 11: 46-50.
7. Dimic-Misic K, Puisto A, Gane P, Nieminen K, Alava M, Paltakari J, Maloney T (2013) The role of MFC/NFC swelling in the rheological behavior and dewatering of high consistency furnishes. Cellulose 20: 2847-2861.
8. Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7: 303-315.
10. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich N, Capadona J, Rowan S, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45: 1-33.
11. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9: 57-65.
12. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10: 162-165.
13. Gericke M, Schlufter K, Liebert T, Heinze T, Budtova T (2009) Rheological properties of cellulose/ionic liquid solutions: from dilute to concentrated states. Biomacromolecules 10: 1188-1194.
14. Haward SJ, Sharma V, Butts CP, McKinley GH, Rahatekar SS (2012) Shear and extensional rheology of cellulose/ionic liquid solutions. Biomacromolecules 13: 1688-1699.
15. Hori R, Wada M (2005) The thermal expansion of wood cellulose crystals. Cellulose 12: 479-484.
16. Ishii D, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 12: 548-550.
17. Ishii D, Saito T, Isogai A (2012) Correction to viscoelastic evaluation of average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13: 1706.
18. Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd edn. Elsevier, London.
19. Iwamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2014) Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polym J 46: 73-76.
20. Mason SG (1950) The motion of fibers in flowing liquids. Pulp Pap Mag Can 51: 93-100.
21. Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2010) Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 11: 1696-1700.
22. Parra-Vasquez ANG, Stepanek I, Davis VA, Moore VC, Haroz EH, Shaver J, Hauge RH, Smalley RE, Pasquali M (2007) Simple length determination of single-walled carbon nanotubes by viscosity measurements in dilute suspensions. Macromolecules 40: 4043-4047.
23. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromolecules 5: 1983-1989.
24. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules 14: 248-253.
25. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T (1962) Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers. J Polym Sci 57: 651-660.
26. Saxena IM, Brown RM Jr (2005) Cellulose biosynthesis: current views and evolving concepts. Ann Bot 96: 9-21.
27. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2012) Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13: 842-849.
28. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17: 459-494.
29. 2 systems in water at pH 4. 8 or 6. 8. Int J Biol Macromol 51: 228-234.