Procedural aspects of tax fairness: A content analysis of canadian tax jurisprudence

ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 21-37

  Farrar, Jonathan M ^a   Donnelly, Maureen E ^b   Dhaliwal, Sonia B ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Informational fairness; Interpersonal fairness; Procedural fairness

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015402473     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1543866X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/jltr-50552     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bies, R., and J. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 1, edited by Lewicki, R., B. Sheppard, and M. Bazerman, 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Byrne, Z., and B. Miller. 2009. Is justice the same for everyone? Examining fairness items using multi-group analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 24 (1): 51-64.
3. Cartier, G. 2003. Procedural fairness in legislative functions: The end of judicial abstinence. University of Toronto Law Journal 53 (Summer): 217-264.
4. Colquitt, J. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 386-400.
5. Colquitt, J., J. Greenberg, and C. Zapata-Phelan. 2005. What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In Handbook of Organizational Justice, edited by Greenberg, J., and J. Colquitt, 1-46. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Cropanzano, R., and J. Greenberg. 1997. Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by Cooper, C. L., and I. T. Robertson, 317-372. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
7. de Cremer, D., I. Cornelis, and A. Van Hiel. 2008. To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation. Journal of Social Psychology 148 (1): 61-76.
8. Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Doherty, D., and J. Wolak. 2012. When do the ends justify the means? Evaluating procedural fairness. Political Behavior 34 (2): 301-323.
9. Dyzenhaus, D., and E. Fox-Decent. 2001. Rethinking the process/substance distinction: Baker v. Canada. University of Toronto Law Journal 51 (Summer): 193-242.
10. Folger, R., and R. Cropanzano. 1998. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Folger, R., and R. Cropanzano. 2001. Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Advances in Organizational Justice, edited by Greenberg, J., and R. Cropanzano, 1-55. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Greenberg, J. 1993. The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, edited by Cropanzano, R., 79-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
13. Greenberg, J., R. Bies, and D. Eskew. 1991. Establishing fairness in the eye of the beholder: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Applied Impression Management: How Image Making Affects Managerial Decisions, edited by Giacalone, R., and P. Rosenfeld, 111-132. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Hsieh, H., and S. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277-1288.
15. Kirchler, E. 2007. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by Gergen, K., M. Greenberg, and R. Willis, 27-55. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
17. Murphy, K. 2004. The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2): 187-209.
18. Murphy, K. 2005. Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax noncompliance. Journal of Law and Society 32 (4): 562-589.
19. Murphy, K. 2009. Procedural justice and affect intensity: Understanding reactions to regulatory authorities. Social Justice Research 22 (1): 1-30.
20. National Audit Office (NAO). 2007. HM Revenue and Customs 2006-07 Accounts: The Comptroller and Auditor General's Standard Report. London, U. K.: National Audit Office.
21. Reuben, E., and F. van Winden. 2010. Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take. Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (6): 908-922.
22. Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Schweitzer, M. E., and D. E. Gibson. 2008. Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision-making: Consequences of violating community standards of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3): 287-301.
24. Slemrod, J. 2007. Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 25-48.
25. Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS). 2012. 2012 Annual Report to Congress, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Taxpayer Advocate Service.
26. Thibault, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
27. Van den Bos, K., S. L. Peters, D. R. Bobocel, and J. F. Ybema. 2006. On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (3): 273-289.
28. Verboon, P., and S. Goslinga. 2009. The role of fairness in tax compliance. Netherlands Journal of Psychology 65 (1): 136-145.
29. Verboon, P., and M. van Dijke. 2007. A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology 28 (6): 704-727.
30. Weber, R. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Wenzel, M. 2002. The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (4): 629-645.
32. Wenzel, M. 2003. Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion, edited by Braithwaite, V. Aldershot, U. K.: Ashgate Publishing.
33. Worsham, R. 1996. The effect of tax authority behavior on taxpayer compliance: A procedural justice approach. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 18 (2): 19-39.