Procedural justice and affect intensity: Understanding reactions to regulatory authorities

Social Justice Research

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-30

  Murphy, Kristina ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Affect intensity; Compliance behavior; Emotions; Procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949134569     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-008-0086-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ball, G. A., Klebe-Trevino, L., & Sims, H. P. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 299-322.
2. Bies, R., Martin, C., & Brockner, J. (1993). Just laid off, but still a good citizen: Only if the process is fair. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 227-248.
3. Braithwaite, J., & Makkai, T. (1994). Trust and compliance. Policing and Society, 4, 1-12.
4. Braithwaite, V. (1987). The scale of emotional arousability: Bridging the gap between the neuroticism construct and its measurement. Psychological Medicine, 17, 217-225.
5. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., et al. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394-407.
6. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
7. Brown, D. J., & Lord, R. G. (1999). The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 531-539.
8. Buss, A., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Chebat, J. C., & Slusarczyk, W. (2005). How emotions mediate the effect of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58, 664-673.
10. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 293-299.
11. De Cremer, D., & Van den Bos, K. (2007). Justice and feelings: Toward a new era in justice research. Social Justice Research, 20, 1-9.
12. Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253-1265.
13. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
14. Greenhalgh, L., & Chapman, D. I. (1995). Joint decision making: The inseparability of relationships and negotiation. In R. M. Kramer & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process: New trends in theory and research (pp. 166-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social institutionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
16. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78(1), 269-303.
17. Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13, 339-360.
18. Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.
19. Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Cropanzano, R. S. (1987). Cognitive operations associated with individual differences in affect intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 767-774.
20. Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. (1986). Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 803-814.
21. Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557-590.
22. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & a Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
23. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
24. Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, J. (1994). The dialectics of corporate deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 347-373.
25. Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (2008). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
26. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
27. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
28. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
29. Murphy, K. (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38, 379-408.
30. Murphy, K. (2004a). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187-209.
31. Murphy, K. (2004b). Procedural justice, emotions, and resistance to authority: An empirical study. Paper presented at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law's: Emotions, Crime and Justice Conference, Onati, Spain, 13-14 September 2004.
32. Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy and tax non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 32(4), 562-589.
33. Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007). Shaming, shame and recidivism: A test of reintegrative shaming theory in the white collar crime context. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 900-917.
34. Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behavior: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652-668.
35. Murphy-Berman, V., Cross, T., & Fondacaro, M. (1999). Fairness and health care decision making: Testing the group value model of procedural justice. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 117-129.
36. Rhoades, J. A., Arnold, J., & Jay, C. (2001). The role of affective traits and affective states in disputants' motivation and behavior during episodes of organizational conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 329-345.
37. Scheff, T., & Retzinger, S. (1991). Emotions and violence: Shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
38. Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (1993). Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 574-586.
39. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513-547.
40. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice: criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
41. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
42. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
43. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2003). Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review,7, 349-361.
45. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
46. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
47. Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.
48. Van den Bos, K., Maas, M., Waldring, I. E., & Semin, G. R. (2003). Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity. Social Justice Research, 16(2), 151-168.
49. Van Yperen, N. W., Hagedoorn, M., Zweers, M., & Postma, S. (2000). Injustice and employees' destructive responses: The mediating role of state negative affect. Social Justice Research, 13(3), 291-312.
50. Vermunt, R., Blaauw, E., van Knippenberg, D., & van Knippenberg, B. (2001). Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 621-628.
51. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786-794.
52. Wenzel, M. (2002a). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
53. Wenzel, M. (2002b). Principles of procedural fairness in reminder letters: A field-experiment. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 42. Canberra: The Australian National University.