Model-based quantification of metabolic interactions from dynamic microbial-community data

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Hanemaaijer, Mark ^a   Olivier, Brett G ^a   Röling, Wilfred F M ^a   Bruggeman, Frank J ^a   Teusink, Bas ^a  

^a AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PROTON TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STOICHIOMETRY; WOLINELLA SUCCINOGENES; COCULTURE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WOLINELLA;

HYDROGEN;

CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; HYDROGEN; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WOLINELLA;

EID: 85014919668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173183     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science. 2015; 350(6261):663-666. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2602 PMID: 26542567
2. De Vuyst L, Neysens P. The sourdough microflora: biodiversity and metabolic interactions. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2005; 16(1):43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.012
3. Møller S, Sternberg C, Andersen JB, Christensen BB, Ramos JL, Givskov M, et al. In situ gene expression in mixed-culture biofilms: evidence of metabolic interactions between community members. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1998; 64(2):721-732. PMID: 9464414
4. Stams AJ. Metabolic interactions between anaerobic bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1994; 66(1-3):271-294. doi: 10.1007/BF00871644 PMID: 7747937
5. Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, et al. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(7):e1002606-e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606 PMID: 22807668
6. Barberán A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. The ISME journal. 2012; 6(2):343-351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011. 119 PMID: 21900968
7. Hanemaaijer M, Röling WF, Olivier BG, Khandelwal RA, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. Systems modeling approaches for microbial community studies: from metagenomics to inference of the community structure. Frontiers in microbiology. 2015; 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00213 PMID: 25852671
8. Zengler K, Palsson BO. A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2012; 10(5):366-372. PMID: 22450377
9. Röling WF, van Bodegom PM. Toward quantitative understanding on microbial community structure and functioning: a modeling-centered approach using degradation of marine oil spills as example. Frontiers in microbiology. 2014; 5. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00125 PMID: 24723922
10. Klitgord N, Segre D. Ecosystems biology of microbial metabolism. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2011; 22(4):541-546. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.018 PMID: 21592777
11. Levy R, Borenstein E. Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the human microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110 (31):12804-12809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300926110 PMID: 23858463
12. Stolyar S, Van Dien S, Hillesland KL, Pinel N, Lie TJ, Leigh JA, et al. Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Molecular systems biology. 2007; 3(1). doi: 10.1038/msb4100131 PMID: 17353934
13. Salimi F, Zhuang K, Mahadevan R. Genome-scale metabolic modeling of a clostridial co-culture for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnology journal. 2010; 5(7):726-738. doi: 10.1002/biot.201000159 PMID: 20665645
14. Hanly TJ, Henson MA. Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co-cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2011; 108(2):376-385. doi: 10.1002/bit.22954 PMID: 20882517
15. Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming RM, Thiele I. Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut microbes. 2013; 4(1):3-15. doi: 10.4161/gmic.22370 PMID: 23022739
16. Klitgord N, Segre D. Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(11):e1001002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001002 PMID: 21124952
17. Khandelwal RA, Olivier BG, Röling WF, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. Community Flux Balance Analysis for Microbial Consortia at Balanced Growth. PloS one. 2013; 8(5):e64567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0064567 PMID: 23741341
18. Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Clement L, Balloi A, Daffonchio D, Heylen K, et al. Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature. 2009; 458(7238):623-626. doi: 10.1038/nature07840 PMID: 19270679
19. Pawelczyk S, Abraham WR, Harms H, Müller S. Community-based degradation of 4-chorosalicylate tracked on the single cell level. Journal of microbiological methods. 2008; 75(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.018 PMID: 18593643
20. Patle S, Lal B. Ethanol production from hydrolysed agricultural wastes using mixed culture of Zymomonas mobilis and Candida tropicalis. Biotechnology letters. 2007; 29(12):1839-1843. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9493-4 PMID: 17657407
21. Yang J, Kim J, Skogley E, Schaff B. A simple spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in water, resin, and soil extracts. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1998; 62(4):1108-1115. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040036x
22. Lee SM, Cho MO, Um Y, Sang BI. Development of Real-Time PCR primer and probe sets for detecting degenerated and non-degenerated forms of the butanol-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology. 2010; 161(1-8):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8788-4 PMID: 19798472
23. Olivier BG, Bergmann FT. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Package: Flux Balance Constraints. Journal of integrative bioinformatics. 2015; 12(2):269. doi: 10.2390/biecoll-jib-2015-269 PMID: 26528567
24. Zhuang K, Izallalen M, Mouser P, Richter H, Risso C, Mahadevan R, et al. Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments. The ISME journal. 2010; 5(2):305-316. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.117 PMID: 20668487
25. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. {SciPy}: Open source scientific tools for {Python}. 2014;.
26. Mahadevan R, Schilling C. The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. Metabolic engineering. 2003; 5(4):264-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09.002 PMID: 14642354
27. Wilson P, Peterson W, Fred E. The relationship between the nitrogen and carbon metabolism of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Journal of bacteriology. 1930; 19(4):231. PMID: 16559425
28. Rosenblum ED, Wilson P. Fixation of isotopic nitrogen by Clostridium. Journal of bacteriology. 1949; 57 (4):413. PMID: 18120606
29. Chen J, Toth J, Kasap M. Nitrogen-fixation genes and nitrogenase activity in Clostridium acetobutylicum and Clostridium beijerinckii. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001; 27(5):281-286. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000083 PMID: 11781802
30. Chung KT. Inhibitory effects of H2 on growth of Clostridium cellobioparum. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1976; 31(3):342-348. PMID: 779644
31. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ III. Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis of Diauxic Growth in Escherichia coli. Biophysical journal. 2002; 83(3):1331-1340. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73903-9 PMID: 12202358
32. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: Part I. Metabolic network resolution and analysis. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2008; 101(5):1036. doi: 10.1002/bit.22010 PMID: 18767192
33. Lee J, Yun H, Feist AM, Palsson BØ, Lee SY. Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 metabolic network. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2008; 80(5):849-862. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1654-4 PMID: 18758767
34. Bokranz M, Katz J, Schröder I, Roberton AM, Kröger A. Energy metabolism and biosynthesis of Vibrio succinogenes growing with nitrate or nitrite as terminal electron acceptor. Archives of Microbiology. 1983; 135(1):36-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00419479
35. Schumacher W, Kroneck PM, Pfennig N. Comparative systematic study on "Spirillum" 5175, Campylobacter and Wolinella species. Archives of microbiology. 1992; 158(4):287-293. doi: 10.1007/BF00245247
36. Reed JL, Famili I, Thiele I, Palsson BO. Towards multidimensional genome annotation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006; 7(2):130-141. doi: 10.1038/nrg1769 PMID: 16418748
37. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Molenaar D, Francke C, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, et al. Analysis of growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a complex medium using a genome-scale metabolic model. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006; 281(52):40041-40048. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606263200 PMID: 17062565
38. Kelk SM, Olivier BG, Stougie L, Bruggeman FJ. Optimal flux spaces of genome-scale stoichiometric models are determined by a few subnetworks. Scientific reports. 2012; 2. doi: 10.1038/srep00580 PMID: 22896812
39. Van Andel JG, Zoutberg GR, Crabbendam PM and Breure AM. Glucose fermentation by Clostridium butyricum grown under a self generated gas atmosphere in chemostat culture. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 1985; 23(1):21-26. doi: 10.1007/BF02660113
40. Ávila M, Gómez-Torres N, Hernández M, Garde S. Inhibitory activity of reuterin, nisin, lysozyme and nitrite against vegetative cells and spores of dairy-related Clostridium species. International journal of food microbiology. 2014; 172:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.002 PMID: 24361835
41. Berry D, Widder S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Frontiers in microbiology. 2014; 5. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219 PMID: 24904535
42. Zhou J, Deng Y, Luo F, He Z, Yang Y. Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. MBio. 2011; 2(4):e00122-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00122-11 PMID: 21791581
43. Åkesson M, Förster J, Nielsen J. Integration of gene expression data into genome-scale metabolic models. Metabolic engineering. 2004; 6(4):285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2003.12.002 PMID: 15491858
44. Maarleveld TR, Boele J, Bruggeman FJ, Teusink B. A data integration and visualization resource for the metabolic network of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant physiology. 2014; p. pp-113.
45. Yizhak K, Benyamini T, Liebermeister W, Ruppin E, Shlomi T. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(12):i255-i260. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq183 PMID: 20529914
46. Embree M, Liu JK, Al-Bassam MM, Zengler K. Networks of energetic and metabolic interactions define dynamics in microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112 (50):15450-15455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506034112 PMID: 26621749
47. Kraft B, Tegetmeyer HE, Sharma R, Klotz MG, Ferdelman TG, Hettich RL, et al. The environmental controls that govern the end product of bacterial nitrate respiration. Science. 2014; 345(6197):676-679. doi: 10.1126/science.1254070 PMID: 25104387