Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

Gut

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 438-445

  Van Doorn, S C ^a   Van Der Vlugt, M ^a   Depla, A C T M ^b   Wientjes, C A ^c   Mallant Hent, R C ^d   Siersema, P D ^e   Tytgat, K M A J ^g   Tuynman, H ^a,b   Kuiken, S D ^c   Houben, G M P ^b   Stokkers, P C F ^c   Moons, L M G ^e   Bossuyt, P M M ^f   Fockens, P ^a   Mundt, M W ^d   Dekker, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SLOTERVAART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^d Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g NONE

Author keywords

colonoscopy; colorectal adenomas; Colorectal cancer; polyp

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPE; ENDOCUFF ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE ENDOSCOPY; INTUBATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIANAL ABSCESS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX RATIO; ADENOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; FECES; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADENOMA; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; FECES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 85014705086     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-96.
2. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50.
3. Kaminski M, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
4. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298-306.
5. Lee TJW, Rutter MD, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012;61:1050-7.
6. Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R, et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:71-8.
7. Westwood D a, Alexakis N, Connor SJ. Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:218-25.
8. Martínez ME, Baron J a, Lieberman D a, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009;136:832-41.
9. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1077-85.
10. Saini SD, Kim HM, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:614-26.
11. Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans. Gut 2011;60:1537-43.
12. de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, van Leerdam ME, et al. Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2011;43:560-72.
13. Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau J-M, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013;45:842-51.
14. East JE, Saunders BP, Boone D, et al. Uni- and bidirectional wide angle CT colonography: effect on missed areas, surface visualization, viewing time and polyp conspicuity. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1910-17.
15. Ng SC, Tsoi KKF, Hirai HW, et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1165-73.
16. He Q, Li J, An S-L, et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:279-81.
17. Morgan JL, Thomas K, Braungart S, et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:353-60.
18. Omata F, Ohde S, Deshpande G a, et al. Image-enhanced, chromo, and cap-assisted colonoscopy for improving adenoma/neoplasia detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014;49:222-37.
19. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012;61:1426-34.
20. Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012;61:402-8.
21. Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, et al. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:413-18.
22. Floer M, Biecker E, Ro H. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy-a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e114267.
23. TEN ALEA ID Project. ALEA Randomisation Software (Version 2.2) (Computer software). Amsterdam: Netherlands Cancer Institute, 2006. http://tenalea.net/
24. Chilton A, Rutter M. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Colonoscopy. NHS BCSP Publ No 6, 2011. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/publications/nhsbcsp06.pdf
25. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620-5.
26. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000;47:251-5.
27. van den Broek FJC, Fockens P, Van Eeden S, et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:288-95.
28. Kuiper T, van Den Broek FJC, Naber AH, et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011;140:1887-94.
29. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:S16-28.
30. Pohl H. Cap-assisted Colonoscopy and Detection of A denomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2015;47:891-7.
31. Tsiamoulos ZP, Saunders BP. A new accessory, endoscopic cuff, improves colonoscopic access for complex polyp resection and scar assessment in the sigmoid colon (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:1242-5.
32. Morgan J, Thomas K, Rl N, et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD008211.
33. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut 2012;61:1576-82.
34. Sanduleanu S, Rondagh EJA, Masclee AAM. Development of expertise in the detection and classification of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia: experience-based data at an academic GI unit. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010;20:449-60.
35. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997;112:594-642.
36. Bond JH. Colon polyps and cancer. Endoscopy 2003;35:27-35.