Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 413-418

  Biecker, Erwin ^a   Floer, Martin ^b   Heinecke, Achim ^c   Ströbel, Philipp ^b   Böhme, Rita ^b   Schepke, Michael ^a   Meister, Tobias ^b  

^a HELIOS Hospital Siegburg   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

adenoma; colonoscopy; detection; Endocuff; endoscopic cuff; polyps

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MOVIPREP; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUFF; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TUMOR VOLUME; ADENOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CARCINOMA; CECUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIGMOID;

ADENOMA; AGED; CARCINOMA; CECUM; COLON, SIGMOID; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84928586236     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: 15392031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69-90.
2. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375: 1624-1633.
3. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544-573.
4. Kohler BA, Ward E, McCarthy BJ, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:714-736.
5. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-To-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-28.
6. East JE, Saunders BP, Burling D, et al. Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2529-2535.
7. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352-359.
8. Westwood DA, Alexakis N, Connor SJ. Transparent capassisted colonoscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55:218-225.
9. Morgan J, Thomas K, Lee-Robichaud H, et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for investigation of gastrointestinal tract conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;16:CD008211.
10. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Adenoma detection with cap-Assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61:1426-1434.
11. Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW, et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy. 2006;38:739-742.
12. Tsiamoulos ZP, Saunders BP. A new accessory, endoscopic cuff, improves colonoscopic access for complex polyp resection and scar assessment in the sigmoid colon (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:1242-1245.
13. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251-255.
14. Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam COLON capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123-127.
15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G.Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39: 175-191.
16. Kim TS, Park DI, Lee do Y, et al. Endoscopy nurse participation may increase the polyp detection rate by second-year fellows during screening colonoscopies. Gut Liver. 2012;6:344-348.
17. Ricci E, Hassan C, Petruzziello L, et al. Inter-centre variability of the adenoma detection rate: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:1022-1027.
18. Ahn SB, Han DS, Bae JH, et al. The miss rate for colorectal adenoma determined by quality-Adjusted, back-To-back colonoscopies. Gut Liver. 2012;6:64-70.
19. Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS, et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-Assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61:402-408.
20. Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined waterexchange and cap-Assisted colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:944-948.
21. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:341-345.
22. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kato N, et al. Hood-Assisted colonoscopy is more effective in detection of colorectal adenomas than narrow-band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:379-383.
23. Ng SC, Tsoi KK, Hirai HW, et al. The efficacy of cap-Assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1165-1173.
24. Vukasin AP, Ballantyne GH, Flannery JT, et al. Increasing incidence of cecal and sigmoid carcinoma. Data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Cancer. 1990;66:2442-2449.