Protein deprivation decreases male survival and the intensity of sexual antagonism in southern field crickets Gryllus bimaculatus

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 839-847

  Han, C S ^a   Dingemanse, N J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

intersexual genetic correlation; nutritional preference; protein deprivation; sex difference; sexual antagonism

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ANTAGONISM; CRICKET; DIET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENT; PROTEIN; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SURVIVAL;

GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS BIMACULATUS;

ANIMAL; DIET; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL CHARACTERISTICS;

ANIMALS; DIET; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; HUMANS; MALE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 85014229439     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13052     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adler, M.I. & Bonduriansky, R. 2014. Why do the well-fed appear to die young? BioEssays 36: 439–450.
2. Andersen, L.H., Kristensen, T.N., Loeschcke, V., Toft, S. & Mayntz, D. 2010. Protein and carbohydrate composition of larval food affects tolerance to thermal stress and desiccation in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 56: 336–340.
3. Arnqvist, G. 2011. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation. Evolution 65: 2111–2116.
4. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Austin, P.C. & Hux, J.E. 2002. A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. J. Vasc. Surg. 36: 194–195.
6. Berger, D., Grieshop, K., Lind, M.I., Goenaga, J., Maklakov, A.A. & Arnqvist, G. 2014. Intralocus sexual conflict and environmental stress. Evolution 68: 2184–2196.
7. Bonduriansky, R. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 280–288.
8. Chambers, P., Simpson, S. & Raubenheimer, D. 1995. Behavioural mechanisms of nutrient balancing in Locusta migratoria nymphs. Anim. Behav. 50: 1513–1523.
9. Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57: 2326–2334.
10. Chippindale, A.K., Chu, T.J. & Rose, M.R. 1996. Complex trade-offs and the evolution of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: 753–766.
11. Connallon, T. & Clark, A.G. 2011. Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 151–155.
12. Connallon, T. & Clark, A.G. 2014. Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281: 20132123.
13. Connallon, T. & Hall, M.D. 2016. Genetic correlations and sex-specific adaptation in changing environments. Evolution 70: 2186–2198.
14. Connallon, T., Cox, R.M. & Calsbeek, R. 2010. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64: 1671–1682.
15. Cox, R.M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173: 176–187.
16. Dierks, A., Hoffmann, B., Bauerfeind, S.S. & Fischer, K. 2012. Effects of inbreeding on life history and thermal performance in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Popul. Ecol. 54: 83–90.
17. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, London.
18. Fontana, L., Partridge, L. & Longo, V.D. 2010. Extending healthy life span—from yeast to humans. Science 328: 321–326.
19. Franke, K. & Fischer, K. 2013. Effects of inbreeding and temperature stress on life history and immune function in a butterfly. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 517–528.
20. Gibbs, A.G. & Matzkin, L.M. 2001. Evolution of water balance in the genus Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 204: 2331–2338.
21. Hadfield, J.D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33: 1–22.
22. Han, C.S. & Dingemanse, N.J. 2017. You are what you eat: diet shapes body component, personality and behavioural stability. BMC Evol. Biol. 17: 8.
23. Han, C.S., Jäger, H. & Dingemanse, N.J. 2016. Individuality in nutritional preferences: a multi-level approach in field crickets. Sci. Rep. 6: 29071.
24. Harrison, S.J., Raubenheimer, D., Simpson, S.J., Godin, J.-G.J. & Bertram, S.M. 2014. Towards a synthesis of frameworks in nutritional ecology: interacting effects of protein, carbohydrate and phosphorus on field cricket fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281: 20140539.
25. Harshman, L., Hoffmann, A. & Clark, A. 1999. Selection for starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: physiological correlates, enzyme activities and multiple stress responses. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 370–379.
26. Hercus, M.J. & Hoffmann, A.A. 1999. Desiccation resistance in interspecific Drosophila crosses: genetic interactions and trait correlations. Genetics 151: 1493–1502.
27. Hunt, J., Brooks, R., Jennions, M.D., Smith, M.J., Bentsen, C.L. & Bussiere, L.F. 2004. High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432: 1024–1027.
28. Jensen, K., Mayntz, D., Toft, S., Clissold, F.J., Hunt, J., Raubenheimer, D. et al. 2012. Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 279: 2212–2218.
29. Julious, S.A. 2004. Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharm. Stat. 3: 217–222.
30. Kasumovic, M.M., Hall, M.D., Try, H. & Brooks, R.C. 2013. Socially cued developmental plasticity affects condition-dependent trait expression. Behav. Ecol. 24: 429–434.
31. Kjærsgaard, A., Blanckenhorn, W.U., Pertoldi, C., Loeschcke, V., Kaufmann, C., Hald, B. et al. 2015. Plasticity in behavioural responses and resistance to temperature stress in Musca domestica. Anim. Behav. 99: 123–130.
32. Kruuk, L.E.B. 2004. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 873–890.
33. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292–305.
34. Le Couteur, D.G., Solon-Biet, S., Cogger, V.C., Mitchell, S.J., Senior, A., de Cabo, R. et al. 2016. The impact of low-protein high-carbohydrate diets on aging and lifespan. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73: 1237–1252.
35. Lee, K.P., Simpson, S.J., Clissold, F.J., Brooks, R., Ballard, J.W.O., Taylor, P.W. et al. 2008. Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: new insights from nutritional geometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 2498–2503.
36. Lee, K.P., Kwon, S.-T. & Roh, C. 2012. Caterpillars use developmental plasticity and diet choice to overcome the early life experience of nutritional imbalance. Anim. Behav. 84: 785–793.
37. Lee, K.P., Kim, J.-S. & Min, K.-J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in nutrient intake and life span is mediated by mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 86: 987–992.
38. Long, T.A., Agrawal, A.F. & Rowe, L. 2012. The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr. Biol. 22: 204–208.
39. Long, T.A. & Rice, W.R. 2007. Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274: 3105–3112.
40. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
41. Mair, W. & Dillin, A. 2008. Aging and survival: the genetics of life span extension by dietary restriction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77: 727–754.
42. Maklakov, A.A., Simpson, S.J., Zajitschek, F., Hall, M.D., Dessmann, J., Clissold, F. et al. 2008. Sex-specific fitness effects of nutrient intake on reproduction and lifespan. Curr. Biol. 18: 1062–1066.
43. Maklakov, A.A., Hall, M.D., Simpson, S.J., Dessmann, J., Clissold, F.J., Zajitschek, F. et al. 2009. Sex differences in nutrient-dependent reproductive ageing. Aging Cell 8: 324–330.
44. Mallet, M.A., Bouchard, J.M., Kimber, C.M. & Chippindale, A.K. 2011. Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 1.
45. Matos, M. 2012. Maternal effects can inflate rate of adaptation to captivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: E2380.
46. Nakagawa, S., Lagisz, M., Hector, K.L. & Spencer, H.G. 2012. Comparative and meta-analytic insights into life extension via dietary restriction. Aging Cell 11: 401–409.
47. Piper, M.D., Blanc, E., Leitão-Gonçalves, R., Yang, M., He, X., Linford, N.J. et al. 2014. A holidic medium for Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Methods 11: 100–105.
48. Poissant, J., Wilson, A.J., Festa-Bianchet, M., Hogg, J.T. & Coltman, D.W. 2008. Quantitative genetics and sex-specific selection on sexually dimorphic traits in bighorn sheep. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275: 623–628.
49. Poissant, J., Wilson, A.J. & Coltman, D.W. 2010. Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64: 97–107.
50. Raubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S. 2003. Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth. J. Exp. Biol. 206: 1669–1681.
51. Raubenheimer, D., Lee, K. & Simpson, S. 2005. Does Bertrand's rule apply to macronutrients? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272: 2429–2434.
52. Reddiex, A.J., Gosden, T.P., Bonduriansky, R. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2013. Sex-specific fitness consequences of nutrient intake and the evolvability of diet preferences. Am. Nat. 182: 91–102.
53. Rice, W.R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735–742.
54. Rice, W. & Chippindale, A. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 685–693.
55. Robinson, M.R., Pilkington, J.G., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Pemberton, J.M. & Kruuk, L.E. 2006. Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep. Evolution 60: 2168–2181.
56. Roeder, K.A. & Behmer, S.T. 2014. Lifetime consequences of food protein-carbohydrate content for an insect herbivore. Funct. Ecol. 28: 1135–1143.
57. Roff, D.A. 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
58. Rothman, J.M., Raubenheimer, D. & Chapman, C.A. 2011. Nutritional geometry: gorillas prioritize non-protein energy while consuming surplus protein. Biol. Lett. 7: 847–849.
59. Sharp, N.P. & Agrawal, A.F. 2013. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 67: 1189–1195.
60. Simpson, S. & Abisgold, J. 1985. Compensation by locusts for changes in dietary nutrients: behavioural mechanisms. Physiol. Entomol. 10: 443–452.
61. Simpson, S. & Raubenheimer, D. 2005. Obesity: the protein leverage hypothesis. Obes. Rev. 6: 133–142.
62. South, S.H., House, C.M., Moore, A.J., Simpson, S.J. & Hunt, J. 2011. Male cockroaches prefer a high carbohydrate diet that makes them more attractive to females: implications for the study of condition dependence. Evolution 65: 1594–1606.
63. Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
64. Telonis-Scott, M., Guthridge, K.M. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2006. A new set of laboratory-selected Drosophila melanogaster lines for the analysis of desiccation resistance: response to selection, physiology and correlated responses. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 1837–1847.
65. Trumper, S. & Simpson, S. 1993. Regulation of salt intake by nymphs of Locusta migratoria. J. Insect Physiol. 39: 857–864.
66. Warbrick-Smith, J., Behmer, S.T., Lee, K.P., Raubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S.J. 2006. Evolving resistance to obesity in an insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 14045–14049.
67. Whitlock, M.C. & Agrawal, A.F. 2009. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63: 569–582.
68. Williams, G.C. 1966. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100: 687–690.
69. Wilson, A.J., Reale, D., Clements, M.N., Morrissey, M.M., Postma, E., Walling, C.A. et al. 2010. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 13–26.
70. Wolf, J.B. & Wade, M.J. 2009. What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364: 1107–1115.
71. Zajitschek, F., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D., Hall, M.D. & Brooks, R.C. 2009. Effects of juvenile and adult diet on ageing and reproductive effort of male and female black field crickets, Teleogryllus commodus. Funct. Ecol. 23: 602–611.
72. Zajitschek, F., Lailvaux, S.P., Dessmann, J. & Brooks, R. 2012. Diet, sex, and death in field crickets. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1627–1636.