Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1776, 2013, Pages

  Connallon, Tim ^a   Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Evolutionary constraint; Fisher's geometric model; Intralocus sexual conflict; Pleiotropy; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTAGONISM; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENOTYPE; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84890064111     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2123     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Orr HA. 2000 Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54, 13-20. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820. 2000.tb00002.x)
2. Welch JJ, Waxman D. 2003 Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57, 1723-1734.
3. Wang Z, Liao BY, Zhang J. 2010 Genomic patterns of pleiotropy and the evolution of complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18034-18039. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.0914711107)
4. Mackay TAF. 2001 The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Ann. Rev. Genet. 35, 303-339. (doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35. 102401.090633)
5. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10.1086/595841)
6. Houle D, Fierst J. 2012 Properties of spontaneous mutational variance and covariance for wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 67, 1116-1130. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01838.x)
7. Rice WR. 1992 Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256, 1436-1439. (doi:10.1126/science.1604317)
8. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 280-288. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005)
9. van Doorn GS. 2009 Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1168, 52-71. (doi:10.1111/j. 1749-6632.2009.04573.x)
10. Pennel TM, Morrow EH. 2013 Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1819-1834. (doi:10. 1002/ece3.540)
11. Maklakov AA, Lummaa V. 2013 Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: causes and constraints. BioEssays 35, 717-724. (doi:10.1002/ bies.201300021)
12. Lande R. 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292-305. (doi:10.2307/2407393)
13. Fisher RA. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press.
14. Orr HA. 2005 The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 119-127. (doi:10. 1038/nrg1523)
15. Orr HA. 2005 Theories of adaptation: what they do and don't say. Genetica 123, 3-13. (doi:10.1007/ s10709-004-2702-3)
16. Blows M, Walsh B. 2009 Spherical cows grazing on flatland: constraints to selection and adaptation. In Adaptation and fitness in animal populations (eds J van der Werf, HU Graser, R Frankham, C Gondro), pp. 83-101. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science{thorn}Business Media B.V.
17. Walsh B, Blows M. 2009 Abundant genetic variation{thorn}strong selection1/4multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 41-59. (doi:10.1146/ annurev.ecolsys.110308.120232)
18. Kirkpatrick M. 2009 Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136, 271-284. (doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9302-6)
19. Hill WG. 1982 Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79, 142-145. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 79.1.142)
20. Hill WG. 1982 Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet. Res. Camb. 40, 255-278. (doi:10.1017/ S0016672300019145)
21. Rice SH. 1990 A geometric model for the evolution of development. J. Theor. Biol. 143, 319-342. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80033-5)
22. Waxman D, Welch JJ. 2005 Fisher's microscope and Haldane's ellipse. Am. Nat. 166, 447-457. (doi:10. 1086/444404)
23. Martin G, Lenormand T. 2006 A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60, 893-907.
24. Martin G, Elena SF, Lenormand T. 2007 Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39, 555-560. (doi:10.1038/ng1998)
25. Gordo I, Campos PRA. 2013 Evolution of clonal populations approaching a fitness peak. Biol. Lett. 9, 20120239. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0239)
26. Hietpas RT, Bank C, Jensen JD, Bolon DNA. In press. Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments. Evolution. (doi:10.1111/evo.12207)
27. Perfeito L, Sousa A, Bataillon T, Gordo I. In press. Rates of fitness decline and rebound suggest pervasive epistasis. Evolution. (doi:10.1111/ evo.12234)
28. Caudle SB, Miller CR, Rokyta DR. In press. Environment determines epistatic patterns for a ssDNA virus. Genetics. (doi:10.1534/genetics.113. 158154)
29. Orr HA. 1998 The population genetics of adaptation; the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935-949. (doi:10.2307/ 2411226)
30. Sellis D, Callahan BJ, Petrov DA, Messer PW. 2011 Heterozygote advantage as a natural consequence of adaptation in diploids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20666-20671. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1114573108)
31. Abbott JK. 2011 Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals. Proc. R. Soc. B 178, 161-169. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1401)
32. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 2010 Elements of evolutionary genetics. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company Publishers.
33. Rodgers JL, Nicewander WA. 1988 Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. Am. Stat. 42, 59-66. (doi:10.2307/2685263)
34. Nagylaki T. 1979 Selection in dioecious populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 14, 143-150. (doi:10.1111/j. 1469-1809.1979.tb02007.x)
35. Michael JR, Schucany WR. 2002 The mixture approach for simulating bivariate distributions with specified correlations. Am. Stat. 56, 48-54. (doi:10. 1198/000313002753631367)
36. Poissant J, Wilson AJ, Coltman DW. 2010 Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64, 97-107. (doi:10. 1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00793.x)
37. Griffin RM, Dean R, Grace JL, Rydén P, Friberg U. 2013 The shared genome is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2168-2176. (doi:10.1093/ molbev/mst121)
38. Connallon T, Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2010 Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64, 1671-1682. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009. 00934.x)
39. Lewis Z, Wedell N, Hunt J. 2011 Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Evolution 65, 2085-2097. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01267.x)
40. Gosden TP, Shastri KL, Innocenti P, Chenoweth SF. 2012 The B-matrix harbors significant and sex-specific constraints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66, 2106-2116. (doi:10.1111/ j.1558-5646.2012.01579.x)
41. Stearns SC, Govindaraju DR, Ewbank D, Byars SG. 2012 Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4836-4844. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2012.2024)
42. Long TAF, Agrawal AF, Rowe L. 2012 The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr Biol. 22, 204-208. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.020)
43. Darwin C. 1871 The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.
44. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. 2001 Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364-371. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01) 02160-7)